SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Firesale

Créé par: truculence67
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2021
Publié: 26 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Calvert, Matt
  2. Compher, J.T.
  3. Kaut, Martin
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (COL)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (COL)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
3.
SJS
  1. White, Colin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
4.
SJS
  1. Kuokkanen, Janne
  2. Sharangovich, Yegor
  3. Zacha, Pavel
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
5.
SJS
  1. Borgström, Henrik [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYI
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 137 499 $0 $807 500 $11 362 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
811 666 $811 666 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $ (1 775 000 $$2M1 775 000 $$2M)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 21
#1
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
that trade is so bad for the senators
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 22
#2
NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,504
Mentions "j'aime": 1,109
Hell yeah. I'd be so happy with Marleau here. He's a perfect fit and Lou loves him.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 23
#3
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
You should get more for Meier. Add more prospects
yikes a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,069
Mentions "j'aime": 12,075
I don't really see Ottawa doing Lebanc for White, let alone adding a 2nd. White is a more versatile player.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 27
#5
NYI fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 75
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Lou blocks Doug Wilson's phone number after this call.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
You should get more for Meier. Add more prospects


[the sarcastic version of me said this ^]

In reality, the Meier deal asks for waaaaaaayy too much.
Two of those guys are out-producing Meier this year and the other one is solid, 22-years young, future 3C.
Maybe Sharks would get one of those guys, but that's it.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 30
#7
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,108
Mentions "j'aime": 12,844
The Meier and Hertl trades suck for the sharks. Just better quality offers you’d be able to find.
Labanc trade sucks for the Sens.

Quoting: goowy
Lou blocks Doug Wilson's phone number after this call.

makes no sense as to why lol..
Klara et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 38
#8
Were a team
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Ottawa isn't trading White, especially not for Labanc. White has the same amount of points while being better defensively, younger, and signed for longer.
Pinto a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 39
#9
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Probably not a bad price to pay for Donato...
How has he been this year?
26 févr. 2021 à 12 h 51
#10
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,968
Mentions "j'aime": 927
Quoting: VijayPatel11
Probably not a bad price to pay for Donato...
How has he been this year?


Without being too negative, he's really been one of a few highlights this season.
26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 13
#11
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
That's not enough from Colorado for Hertl. Think something like 1st + Timmins + Kaut + Jost + Compher. And even then they'd be in their right to insist on Newhook.
26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 21
#12
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,108
Mentions "j'aime": 12,844
Quoting: Richard88
That's not enough from Colorado for Hertl. Think something like 1st + Timmins + Kaut + Jost + Compher. And even then they'd be in their right to insist on Newhook.


That’s a lot tbh. I’d do Newhook a first maybe Jost and/or something based on negotiations (all scenarios would include 50% on Hertl for the 2 year contract if it would happen this year). I don’t love Timmins injury issues so I’d just leave him to you guys to continue to work with.

Newhook and a first seems like a fair base for Hertl and y’all wouldn’t need to add to much more as Newhook’s value is quite high I’d safely assume.
26 févr. 2021 à 13 h 36
#13
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: yikes
That’s a lot tbh. I’d do Newhook a first maybe Jost and/or something based on negotiations (all scenarios would include 50% on Hertl for the 2 year contract if it would happen this year). I don’t love Timmins injury issues so I’d just leave him to you guys to continue to work with.

Newhook and a first seems like a fair base for Hertl and y’all wouldn’t need to add to much more as Newhook’s value is quite high I’d safely assume.


I meant that San Jose would prefer a deal around Newhook + 1st instead of Timmins + 1st + Kaut + Compher + Jost.

San Jose would insist on Newhook being in any package.

Hertl has a 3 team NTC though so if Avs are the only destination maybe a deal could work that doesn't involve Newhook if he really wants to go to Colorado.
26 févr. 2021 à 14 h 47
#14
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: NHLfan10506
[the sarcastic version of me said this ^]

In reality, the Meier deal asks for waaaaaaayy too much.
Two of those guys are out-producing Meier this year and the other one is solid, 22-years young, future 3C.
Maybe Sharks would get one of those guys, but that's it.


I dont think he was serious ... seemed like a troll post to me.
26 févr. 2021 à 14 h 50
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
Quoting: Opie
I dont think he was serious ... seemed like a troll post to me.


I guess
(but some saying not enough for Meier, which is bonkers)
26 févr. 2021 à 16 h 12
#16
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I guess
(but some saying not enough for Meier, which is bonkers)


Kind of strange given they have the three players acquired slotted in as 2C, 2LW & 3C above ... not to mention the two picks.
26 févr. 2021 à 17 h 4
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,250
Mentions "j'aime": 2,877
Hertl and Donato deals are gonna need more value going to the Sharks.
26 févr. 2021 à 20 h 46
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
Quoting: Opie
Kind of strange given they have the three players acquired slotted in as 2C, 2LW & 3C above ... not to mention the two picks.


Yeah, right. 2C, 3C and 2LW for Timo Meier. Oompf.
26 févr. 2021 à 23 h 31
#19
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Yeah, right. 2C, 3C and 2LW for Timo Meier. Oompf.


And two seconds ... one of which will be a top 40 pick overall.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage