SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Petro to Leafs after Blues fail to come to terms

Créé par: insaneDane09
Équipe: 2020-21 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2020
Publié: 31 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Steen retires. Bozak gets traded for a draft pick to someone saving the Blues money on a buy out (any team will do, not just Florida). This leaves $3.5m in cap space which should be enough to resign RFAs Vince Dunn and Jacob De La Rose. Giving the Blues a full roster plus one forward and one defensive scatch.

The Marner trade here is going to be polarizing. Not really sure how realistic that trade is, but I do think the Leafs might consider trading one of the big 4 if this playoff run is another failure. Also, if the Blues can't come to terms with Pietrangelo I think this could be a situation where they sign and trade him to another team.

I think Nylander makes more sense here in general, but cap wise that wasn't enough for either team really to make things work. Leafs are already pushing the cap and Petro will make more than Nylander, so trading them straight up doesn't work. Marner for Petro straight up requires the Blues to dump more cap but it likely takes more to get Marner than that anyways so I threw in a young, up and comer in Sanford who is also pretty cheap and contract controllable (RFA in 2021-22). Depending on what the Leafs want I think Blais and Barbashev are interchangeable for Sanford as well. Add or subtract draft picks to make this trade actually work for either side, I was more focused on the salary cap working.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Sanford, Zachary
Détails additionnels:
Also pending UFA Alex Pietrangelo
2.
STL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de FLA
Logo de STL
Logo de CAR
2021
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2022
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $68 899 348 $306 349 $425 000 $12 600 652 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 475 000 $1 475 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
or the leafs trade Marner for a worthy package, then grab Petro in UFA without trading him for a bottom 6 winger
McRanteskog a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,937
Mentions "j'aime": 14,600
why in the world would toronto trade mitch marner for a guy they could sign as a UFA for no compensation?
SammyT_51, leafs101 et Sean4417 a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 7
#3
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Pietrangelos value after playoffs is literally in his UFA rights for couple of days/weeks. The biggest value for that I saw ever was like 5th round pick for Hayes rights or Yandle rights. No.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Also you'd have to make a subsequent move (trade schwartz or Perron) to shore up the D, and also because playing on the third line would really hinder Thomas' development
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,754
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
what? why on earth would toronto do that?
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 13
#6
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,474
Mentions "j'aime": 11,410
Not interested.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 20
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: SammyT_51
Pietrangelos value after playoffs is literally in his UFA rights for couple of days/weeks. The biggest value for that I saw ever was like 5th round pick for Hayes rights or Yandle rights. No.


Hadn't considered that, if that's the case, no chance this happens then. That said Petro is a way bigger UFA than Hayes but still very unlikely considering. even with some draft picks going the other way to the Leafs.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: leafs101
Also you'd have to make a subsequent move (trade schwartz or Perron) to shore up the D, and also because playing on the third line would really hinder Thomas' development


If Schwartz or Perron are included here instead of Sanford the Leafs likely can't afford Petro so what's the point? Any additional compensation from the Blues will need to be prospects and/or picks IMO. Thomas has already been playing third line and with ROR and Schenn signed long term he likely will be for a couple more years. It may hinder his development but the Blues are deep at center and contenders so that's a sacrifice that will have to be made. At least trading Bozak gets him back to center where he belongs.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 26
#9
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,895
Mentions "j'aime": 5,882
Quoting: SammyT_51
Pietrangelos value after playoffs is literally in his UFA rights for couple of days/weeks. The biggest value for that I saw ever was like 5th round pick for Hayes rights or Yandle rights. No.


Scott Darling got a third from Carolina.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 32
#10
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Scott Darling got a third from Carolina.


But he was RFA I believe.

EDIT: Nope he wasnt, my bad.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 32
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: leafs101
or the leafs trade Marner for a worthy package, then grab Petro in UFA without trading him for a bottom 6 winger


I mean sure, I guess it is a bit of a stretch but I was looking for ways for this to work with both sides. Leafs need defense but don't have the cap space to sign Petro. Leafs have half their cap in 4 forwards and might consider trading one for more defensive help. Any suggestions on additional compensation to make this work with the Blues? Both teams are in cap hell so just picking Schwartz or Perron (plus still picks/prospects) instead doesn't work, it isn't that simple.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Scott Darling got a third from Carolina.


Quoting: SammyT_51
But he was RFA I believe.

EDIT: Nope he wasnt, my bad.


Yeah but that was in a normal summer where you had about a month in between the postseason and UFA. This offseason you literally only have a week, and he's likely just gonna go to whoever throws the most money and term at him
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
Also in this scenario, if you dont have the money to keep Petro, why are you adding Marner?
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 53
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,139
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: insaneDane09
I mean sure, I guess it is a bit of a stretch but I was looking for ways for this to work with both sides. Leafs need defense but don't have the cap space to sign Petro. Leafs have half their cap in 4 forwards and might consider trading one for more defensive help. Any suggestions on additional compensation to make this work with the Blues? Both teams are in cap hell so just picking Schwartz or Perron (plus still picks/prospects) instead doesn't work, it isn't that simple.


So what's the extension St.Louis has worked and Pietrangelo has signed?
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 58
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Pietrangelo’s UFA rights might get you a 4th rounder from a team desperately in need and that would be the highest UFA rights payment in recent history.

If you want Marner I’d imagine Parayko would most definitely have to be on the table.

Just the 2 cents of a fan of neither team in particular
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2020 à 16 h 59
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Boomer125
So what's the extension St.Louis has worked and Pietrangelo has signed?


I have no knowledge of one, but I'm guessing that's your point? Not sure what you're suggesting though other than maybe the Leafs don't need to trade for Petro like ppl have already suggested which may be true, I won't argue that.
31 juill. 2020 à 17 h 5
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,139
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: insaneDane09
I have no knowledge of one, but I'm guessing that's your point? Not sure what you're suggesting though other than maybe the Leafs don't need to trade for Petro like ppl have already suggested which may be true, I won't argue that.


You stated in your description that the blues sign and trade Pietrangelo - without an extension there is way too much risk for TO to consider trading Marner for the right to talk to AP.
31 juill. 2020 à 17 h 42
#18
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: leafs101
or the leafs trade Marner for a worthy package, then grab Petro in UFA without trading him for a bottom 6 winger


^ this
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2020 à 17 h 58
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: insaneDane09
If Schwartz or Perron are included here instead of Sanford the Leafs likely can't afford Petro so what's the point? Any additional compensation from the Blues will need to be prospects and/or picks IMO. Thomas has already been playing third line and with ROR and Schenn signed long term he likely will be for a couple more years. It may hinder his development but the Blues are deep at center and contenders so that's a sacrifice that will have to be made. At least trading Bozak gets him back to center where he belongs.


Base would have to be Marner for Parayko. Whether the Blues do it or not, is not my call. Trading for his rights means very little as he could easily walk and then the leafs have traded Marner for a bottom 6 forward
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage