Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

SlickWilly

Membre depuis
7 nov 2017
Équipe favorite
Blackhawks de Chicago
Deuxième équipe favorite
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Messages dans les forums
2193
Messages par jour
1.71
Sujets de discussion
43
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 22 heures
Sujet: What would you trade for Dumba pre expansion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Aussie_Blackhawk</b></div><div>Yes that is all I would offer, but I don't think that helps them with their Eichel pursuit which I still think is unlikely due to what will be MIN cap problems re-signing everyone.

If MIN took this offer however, got no issues as it leaves us with our 1st and other prospects to go for a LD like Lindholm if as you've mentioned above, we decide to go for it with Kane still relevant.</div></div>

With their prospect pool, I don't think it would make sense for MN to go for Eichel, especially if they were also dangling Dumba, but that is a possible point. Strictly speaking for the Dumba offer, I agree it would be important to keep the 1st to dangle in another trade, so I would keep the offer to Strome and an upper level D prospect that would offset the cost from a 1st to a 2nd.
Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 22 heures
Sujet: What would you trade for Dumba pre expansion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Aussie_Blackhawk</b></div><div>None from CHI. No need for dumba here. We need a LD and Lindholm from ANA is prob a better fit for us at this stage of our development/rebuild.</div></div>

Eh I disagree. I'm high on our young guys projectability, but I think unless we plan on straight up tanking for the next 2 years, it would be better to support Kane while he is still active and before Kubalik passes his prime. If we dont plan on upgrading the team this offseason, I want to sell sell sell on Kubs, Strome, and any other piece we can get significant capital for. If we do plan on upgrading now, I think supplementing Kane Debrincat and Kubalik with a 1D on both sides is ideal. Maybe you would prefer to sign a guy like Hamilton, but I think with Dumba's contract length, it fits pretty well with our expected window, or atleast the current one. Plus his cap hit would make it possible to go after that other 1LD and let Keith chill out a little bit and increase his level of play in less minutes. For me it all comes down to the direction the FO wants to take. I personally think it would be best to tank for 2 more years, so Dumba would be a no from me, but knowing Bowman is probably on the hot seat, I say he goes for it. In this case, my offer for Dumba is Strome, Galvas/Regula, and a 2nd.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 1:01 pm
Sujet: Eichel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chopper02</b></div><div>VGK seems to be a team that could make it work. Here's what would have to happen:

Vegas needs to clear cap. Wanted to trade MAF last off-season but couldn't because they refused to retain. MAF won't play for Buffalo (I'm guessing). Buffalo needs to get something good in return.

Buffalo agrees to retain half of Fleury's contract and trade him to a team he desires. In order to pull this off, they need great assets.

VGK gives: Tuch (cap), Glass (seems to have fallen out of favor), MAF, 2021 1st, 2022 1st, McNabb
Buf then trades a 50% MAF and maybe another player (Thompson) for another 1st and low prospect (or cap) to a team like Philly, Pitts, or someone in contention.</div></div>

If this is the best offer the Sabres get for Eichel, I don't think he's gonna be leaving
Forum: Armchair-GM 2 mai à 19 h 21
Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr à 15 h 42
Sujet: Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Sovzil is arguably a better prospect then Lambos and regularly overlooked. Also would take Evidsson if outside of the top 3 as he is a big stay at home defender with 1st line potential and that is exactly what we need to pair with guys like Boqvist or Mitchell.</div></div>

I actually did forget about Svozil. He's definitely a guy I would consider too in that Lambos range but I dont think I would take either of them higher than 12th or so, which then goes back to the trade back solution if we land in that later end of the top 10 range. Edvinsson has been interesting to me. I've seen him ranked all over the board, with some people ranking him in the 20s, and I personally haven't watched him a whole lot. If Stan and Kelley evaluate him as a top end talent, I won't argue, but if they decide he's not high on their board, I also won't be mad.
Forum: Armchair-GM28 avr à 1 h 54
Sujet: Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stan_Bowman</b></div><div>I like Kubalik, a lot, but I think trading him for Seth Jarvis makes sense for both teams and their timelines. I'm not an expert on the draft this year, but in this scenario I would love getting a LD, RD, and C from the three picks.</div></div>

not really an RD that I like outside of Clarke that would go in the 1st. If we are in top 10, probably take a winger or center first (I'm quite partial to Lucius and Johnson). Top 5 take 1 of Hughes Clarke or Power. Top 15 take Lambos (hopefully). Rest of the draft depends on who we get with the 1st pick realistically. An ideal haul for me would be Hughes and if we can move up again into the 1st I'd like to snag Robertsson or Chibrikov in the later 1st. If we don't get the D we want with the 1st pick, I'd trade back a bit for Lambos and then reclaim some more assets.