SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

minor tweaks

Créé par: fluff118
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 22 juill. 2020
Publié: 23 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trades:

Strome = 2020 2nd + Sorenson
Howden = 2021 3rd

Lemieux <= Nichushkin (this one is close: I like Nichushkin and think he's the better player, but Lemieux is a Denver native and 1 year younger)
Andersson + 2x 3rds(with condition) = Kamenev + Jost

Reasonable Negotiations:
1) Downgrade the 3rd coming back from SJS to a 4th
2) Remove 1 of the 2 conditions from the COL trade

Team Projection:
If the team cannot find any trade candidates without paying to get rid of contracts (Staal/Hank), or if they decide against having a joint retirement ceremony, then they will be bought out together to make room for the new generation.

Kamenev and Jost are both stop gaps and will compete for spots next year (2021-2022) with Barron and any other prospects.

Sorenson is a stop gap exclusively, and Pajuniemi will compete for a spot against training camp invites.

Smiths contract expires at the end of the year, and when he walks in FA (or miraculously gets dealt for a 5th or 6th at the TDL), one of DeAngelo/Trouba(can be swapped below) goes to the left. Pairs would be:
Lindgren/Fox
Trouba/Lundkvist
Miller/DeAngelo
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
55 625 000 $
1730 000 $
22 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
2785 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
SJS
2.
NYR
  1. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kamenev, Vladislav [Droits de RFA]
  3. Nichushkin, Valeri [Droits de RFA]
COL
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Lemieux, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional: 2021 3rd (NYR) becomes 2021 2nd (NYR) if Jost scores 35 pts AND Nichushkin scores 30 pts.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 434 800 $0 $8 362 500 $3 065 200 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
785 000 $785 000 $
C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
730 000 $730 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 4
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
good trade San Jose accepts
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 13
#2
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
COL declines.
Jost > Andersson
Nuke > Lemieux
UpsideDownQue et Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: McRanteskog
COL declines.
Jost > Andersson
Nuke > Lemieux


That is why I have 2 3rds attached to Andersson for Jost
And I admitted that Nuke>Lemieux, but the gap isn't so wide that something can't be worked out. From a pure value point of view, I think it is extremely close. What is a reasonable counter?
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 17
#4
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: fluff118
That is why I have 2 3rds attached to Andersson for Jost
And I admitted that Nuke>Lemieux, but the gap isn't so wide that something can't be worked out. From a pure value point of view, I think it is extremely close. What is a reasonable counter?


The picks were only conditional plus you got Kamenev ontop of the fact i believe Jost>Andersson and Nuke>Lemieux.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Kamenev is practically a throw in.

Including a 5th or 6th takes care of that disparity easily.

Half of the COL ACGM's either throw him in a random trade, or don't trade him AND don't re-sign him, or re-sign him and then leave him in the minors.

And I included in the description above that a reasonable negotiation would be to remove some of the conditions (which were that they would be UPGRADED on condition, not that they were conditional to be included at all...)
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Not a fan of trading Nichushkin at all and I dont like Andersson very much. I would do Jost + Kamenev for 2nd+3rd+4th though
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 28
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: moli92
Not a fan of trading Nichushkin at all and I dont like Andersson very much. I would do Jost + Kamenev for 2nd+3rd+4th though


I understand not wanting to trade Nichushkin. If I was you, I wouldn't want to either; he's a fancy stats wet dream at an affordable price that can play all situations and easily plug holes up and down the lineup. I'm a huge fan of his.

I think the value is pretty much there, but declining on account of team needs/desires/preference, totally reasonable.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 14 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: JumboJoe
good trade San Jose accepts


Happy to hear it. I think these Strome trades can get a bit crazy, but the valuation here is just about spot on imo.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers consider the Colorado trade and quickly decline the San Jose deal.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 26
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Sagecoll
Rangers consider the Colorado trade and quickly decline the San Jose deal.


I'm actually surprised you feel that way about SJ deal.

You think the difference between SJS 2 and TBL 1 is not negated by Sorenson?
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 30
#11
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: fluff118
Kamenev is practically a throw in.

Including a 5th or 6th takes care of that disparity easily.

Half of the COL ACGM's either throw him in a random trade, or don't trade him AND don't re-sign him, or re-sign him and then leave him in the minors.

And I included in the description above that a reasonable negotiation would be to remove some of the conditions (which were that they would be UPGRADED on condition, not that they were conditional to be included at all...)


Kamenev is probably worth like a 4th at this stage. But more likely he'll get traded in a prospect swap. His value isn't nothing though.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 31
#12
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: fluff118
I understand not wanting to trade Nichushkin. If I was you, I wouldn't want to either; he's a fancy stats wet dream at an affordable price that can play all situations and easily plug holes up and down the lineup. I'm a huge fan of his.

I think the value is pretty much there, but declining on account of team needs/desires/preference, totally reasonable.


Quoting: moli92
Not a fan of trading Nichushkin at all and I dont like Andersson very much. I would do Jost + Kamenev for 2nd+3rd+4th though


Yeah from a Colorado perspective it would take a significant overpay to get us to give up Nichuskin. The guy is on a line right now with Landeskog - Kadri - Nichuskin that has the makings of an elite shutdown line in the playoffs. We're not trading him.

The reason why Jost is available is because we have a surplus of bottom 6 forwards, but that doesn't mean that we want to downgrade roster players for the sake of it. Colorado is a contender after all.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 34
#13
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
So you borrowed the earlier trade of:

Jost for Lias + 3rd + 3rd* (upgrades to a 2nd if Jost gets 35 points)

... which is fine...

.... But adding to that condition with Nichuskin also needing to hit 30 points, while including Kamenev + Nichuskin for Lemieux... makes the trade a big no from Colorado.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 34
#14
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,518
Mentions "j'aime": 1,443
Doesn't make sense for colorado who are in win now mode to downgrade a couple of their players to get mid round picks. Colorado declines
Xqb15 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: fluff118
I'm actually surprised you feel that way about SJ deal.

You think the difference between SJS 2 and TBL 1 is not negated by Sorenson?


Not really remotely close. Let's say the Tampa pick is idk 26th? The cost of jumping from 34 to 26 is....pick 33 lol

https://bluebulletreport.com/2019/06/05/2018-19-draft-model-update-part-iii-blue-bullet-draft-pick-value-chart/

Sorensen is a winger who was below replacement level this season, there's really no place for him in the lineup.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 47
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Sagecoll
Not really remotely close. Let's say the Tampa pick is idk 26th? The cost of jumping from 34 to 26 is....pick 33 lol

https://bluebulletreport.com/2019/06/05/2018-19-draft-model-update-part-iii-blue-bullet-draft-pick-value-chart/

Sorensen is a winger who was below replacement level this season, there's really no place for him in the lineup.


Fair enough, and useful tool...however, realistically what do you think the org will settle for (assuming no team gives up a late 1st (i.e. Min with Pitts or SJ with TBLs), and assuming the Org wants Strome gone as bad as you do (which they likely don't but we'll know in a few months), what would be a fair settling point? It's kind of a "can't have your cake and eat it too" situation here...
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 51
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Richard88
So you borrowed the earlier trade of:

Jost for Lias + 3rd + 3rd* (upgrades to a 2nd if Jost gets 35 points)

... which is fine...

.... But adding to that condition with Nichuskin also needing to hit 30 points, while including Kamenev + Nichuskin for Lemieux... makes the trade a big no from Colorado.


What I actually did was borrowed from that earlier trade, and added Kamenev to it, which I thought was approximately reasonable. (clearly noted above)

I went with Lemieux for Nichushkin straight up, admitting that it was close, and that extraneous factors could be considered when discussing the trade. I also specifically noted that the additional condition for Nichushkin could be removed during negotiations. (clearly noted above)

Entirely reasonable things that I did there, that can be discussed and negotiated on, as just because one fan agreed with a trade in another thread doesn't mean that it is cemented and the only fair/reasonable trade available.
23 juill. 2020 à 15 h 55
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: fluff118
Fair enough, and useful tool...however, realistically what do you think the org will settle for


a late 1st or multiple 2nds or a 2nd and very good prospect or a replacement 3C and picks.
23 juill. 2020 à 16 h 30
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
COL declines. Nichushkin is by far and away the best player in the deal particularly defensively. The Jost is awful but we will trade for him and make him our 3C crowd, gotta love that. But hey we will throw in 2 3rd picks and you thrown in another guy and that will be fair. Yeah COL laughs and hangs up.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 16 h 59
#20
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: fluff118
What I actually did was borrowed from that earlier trade, and added Kamenev to it, which I thought was approximately reasonable. (clearly noted above)

I went with Lemieux for Nichushkin straight up, admitting that it was close, and that extraneous factors could be considered when discussing the trade. I also specifically noted that the additional condition for Nichushkin could be removed during negotiations. (clearly noted above)

Entirely reasonable things that I did there, that can be discussed and negotiated on, as just because one fan agreed with a trade in another thread doesn't mean that it is cemented and the only fair/reasonable trade available.


Yeah you didn't do anything unreasonable. Fairly sensible moves to make.

But as every Avs fan has noted the trade makes no sense hockey wise, and the value is off as well. Nichuskin and Lemieux really aren't close at all; because one is an elite defensive player with amazing analytics, and the other one is just a run-of-the-mill bottom 6er/4th liner that you can find in free agency without much difficulty.
23 juill. 2020 à 17 h 0
#21
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,584
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
If Rangers win the Lafreniere lottery, how about Jost + 2021 1st for Kreider?
23 juill. 2020 à 17 h 41
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,777
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Jonas Donskoi does NOT like this trade
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage