PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Salary Cap History
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Salaire retenu
Historique - Rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Salary Cap History
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Sagecoll
Membre depuis
29 mai 2017
Messages dans les forums
6200
Messages par jour
3.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mai à 13 h 13
Sujet:
Kaboom
Would you mind commenting on this so I can add you to my ignore list?
Thanks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mai à 22 h 55
Sujet:
Offseason V 2
Rangers decline all of these...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mai à 12 h 24
Sujet:
Copp is back
Rangers decline both trades.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 22 h 52
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>I won’t say that I know everything about advanced stats because I don’t. But what I do know is that quite a few models do both Skjei and Necas dirty in that stat department. I want to say the JFresh model was one of the ones that was really quirky with Necas, and moreso with Skjei, but I’m not completely sure. That’s why I tend to base my evaluations of players on what I see them do on the ice, not just because I don’t understand the models completely, but because they can be flawed. Mind you, that’s not to say certain on ice performances are not flawed. I mean, if you play with certain players, they will definitely help pad your stats. Much like Guentzel playing with Crosby, Hamilton playing with Slavin, Toews playing with Makar, and in this case, Lindgren playing with Fox. Lindgren allows Fox to jump, much like Toews does for Makar. We can agree to disagree, but the Canes won’t be giving up Drury or Necas to acquire Lindgren, who plays a position that the Canes don’t really need to make any moves to.</div></div>
Gotcha. I think it’s easier say it’s not a big enough need for you guys to spend the appropriate assets to acquire a player. Rather than a player isn’t worth the appropriate market value.
One is personal to your teams needs. One is objective to the market. We tend to conflate those 2 things here. But we shouldn’t.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 20 h 30
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JGCAHC</b></div><div>Montreal laughs at that offer and counter with Price for Lafreniere</div></div>
Yeah as someone who watched Jeff Gorton manage a team for 5 years, he's strongly considering this proposed deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 20 h 29
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlevinKalevra</b></div><div>Wouldn’t be at all surprised if Bourque is ready this year. Skill games like his usually translate well</div></div>
I agree. I think he's probably already good to go. Rangers don't do well to develop their guys at the NHL level so I'd love to take a year and just have him absolutely murder the AHL and get promoted as basically a finished product.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 20 h 28
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>There is also a reason why Drury won’t be traded. He is very likely to be the successor that will receive Staal’s role. None of the Canes other C prospects are at the same level as Drury defensively right now, and are very likely not going to be. Lindgren is very good defensively, but he doesn’t have much outside of that in terms of offense. Necas is still young, and has gotten better defensively this year albeit at the cost of some offense. The Canes are already extremely good in their own zone, but they would need more offense. So, as much as acquiring Lindgren would help the Canes, he doesn’t produce enough offensively as is to make more of a difference than Skjei, for example. Skjei provides the same defensive coverage but with better offensive production and 2mil more in terms of cap. Trading Necas, who put up more points that all but 5 skaters on the Rangers whilst also improving his defensive game, would be massively unwise. Hell, I doubt the Canes would consider trading Necas 1 for 1 for Lafreniere.
Lindgren for Necas straight up won’t happen. Necas is younger, and arguably better (yes I have bias, but we can argue another time over who is better), but also plays a big position of strength for the Canes. Position wise, Necas is expendable, but scoring wise he is not. I do think if Lindgren played for the Canes, his offensive numbers would improve, especially with the way the Canes use the d to jump. You might be able to pry Gunler out in a Lindgren package, but that is unlikely. The Rags need C and RW, and the Canes have plenty available. But Drury and Necas are out of the question. Koivunen isn’t available as well, and more than likely the same goes for Gunler.</div></div>
Thanks for the effort. Not sure of your evaluation, so let's take a look at the numbers...
To be clear since we're talking value:
Ryan Lindgren is sporting a WAR of 2.6 over the past 2 seasons. Brady Skjei is at 0.8, and Necas is at 0.6. I don't think we're really on the same page in terms of where these players are at. Lindgren's value is closer to Pesce (2.9 WAR) than Skjei especially considering his affordable cap hit and age. You'd be <em>adding</em> to a package including any prospect you mentioned as off the table to start the conversation. .
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 18 h 19
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>Canes would pass since they won’t be trading Drury. But Lindgren would be a very interesting addition to the Canes blue line. Instead of that package, would a package of Suzuki, Ponomarev, and a 2nd be a package the Rangers would consider for Lindgren. Ponomarev is a promising prospect, and Suzuki is a former first rounder who has fallen in the Canes C depth charts. It’s pretty much the equivalent of 3 2nd rounders for Lindgren.</div></div>
I do think Lindgren makes sense on the Canes but the target was Drury for a reason. In practice a bulk offer like you’ve put forth doesn’t help much. If you’re not looking to put Drury on the table the next logical option is something like Lindgren for Necas straight up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 15 h 14
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Black61</b></div><div>Ya 1 year doesnt make a career. Gallagher has just shy of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY CAREER GOALS more than goodrow and hes a few weeks younger than him.</div></div>
Right, that’s why I’m throwing in 2 players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 13 h 27
Sujet:
Throwing some new ideas out there
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Black61</b></div><div>If the habs are throwing gallagher out there at less than 3.5 million they will get significantly better offers than the pile of meh proposed</div></div>
Goodrow just outproduced Gallagher playing with the bottom 6 and 1/3rd of the PP time. The contracts and ages are about the same and the Rangers are adding 2 pieces that would both crack the lineup and have team control. You’re not going to get a better offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 10 h 48
Sujet:
Ranger Fans
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlevinKalevra</b></div><div>I wouldn’t be thrilled about giving up Bourque but like you said it makes sense for both teams. Kinda what I had in mind when I posted this</div></div>
I'm not stoked to giving up Lundkvist trust me lol. But you guys are loaded at C and we have a ton of RHD. It makes a lot of sense. Both undersized high IQ guys, both former late 1st rounders, etc.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 10 h 37
Sujet:
Ranger Fans
Bourque for Lundkvist makes sense positionally for both teams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 10 h 36
Sujet:
What If
Easy Rangers declines on both...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 avr. à 9 h 11
Sujet:
The Rebuild Is Never Over
Well at least the Vancouver trade isn't a nightmare...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 avr. à 8 h 28
Sujet:
Zzz post
Pretty easy Rangers decline...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 avr. à 9 h 31
Sujet:
no girouxbe real
LOL Rangers decline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 avr. à 23 h 35
Sujet:
We will see
Easy Rangers decline for both...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 avr. à 12 h 15
Sujet:
Redoing Draft Picks from 2017-2019
Honestly don't think any of the picks were bad. Lias was a bit of a reach, but his SHL production was awesome.
If you want to make an actual difference it's on the development side where the team is terrible. And that's mostly because there's no real skills coach in the organization just a bunch of grinders like Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer.
You can basically keep the picks and just hire like Nate Leaman instead of Quinn. Or fire Quinn after year 1 and go with Quenneville or McLellan. Heck or hire Marty St. Louis to run Hartford or development in like 2018.
Plenty of revisionist history, But I can almost guarantee you that if all you do is swap out the players picked, the result is exactly the same. Chytil is probably Robert Thomas production wise in another organization. Kakko is probably a point / game player elsewhere. It's really just the Rangers ****ty development which goes back all the way to Kovalev.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 mars à 14 h 18
Sujet:
Giving it a try
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Drshnuckels91</b></div><div>Ah yes the one game that rules out the past 3 seasons of 0.910,0.905,0.894</div></div>
I mean if you're just going to judge all shots against and defenses in front of the goaltender the same way then you're going to end up making the same mistake Seattle did with Grubbauer. Hopefully you'd be smart enough to avoid that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 mars à 12 h 32
Sujet:
Giving it a try
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dopplsan</b></div><div>Yeah, but, how many people out here are applauding the received value of the Risto or Jones trade? 😂
That’s my point here - Trouba doesn’t really do anything for us. He’s a RD, sure, but I don’t necessarily buy him as the Top-Pairing guy that would change the make-up of our blue line.He’s getting paid $8M, but playing more like a $5M-$6M guy. Giving anything in value for him alone that is even within the ballpark of the Jones trade is a waste.</div></div>
I'm not saying it's the wisest move - nor was the Nurse contract, or the Lindholm trade/contract, or the Jones trade, or the Risto trade or the Chiarot trade. But that's the market. Physical 6-3 Dmen who play all situations and put up points get pretty massive returns. That's just what the league is now.
And frankly, Trouba's got more even strength points than Werenski right now despite Columbus scoring more often at 5v5. And Zach's in line to make 9.5 mil. I mean of course it's not likely (that Trouba would be traded - if he was, this would be the sort of return), but it kinda makes sense for you guys as a franchise with a sizable amount of cap room, guys like Nyqvist and Voracek coming off the books and not a ton of alternative avenues to bring a comparable player in for cheaper - particularly without giving up picks. I mean Peeke is rough in his current role. Ceulmans if he hits his ceiling is merely as good as Trouba and you're going to need some time to develop your F's.
I think the only way it doesn't make much sense as a roster building idea is if you're <em>trying</em> to tank. But frankly I think your roster is too good to effectively tank.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 mars à 17 h 44
Sujet:
Giving it a try
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dopplsan</b></div><div>Vlad (with an extension) is most definitely a 1st+. Rosy is probably a 1st-equivalent, and Robinson is a 2nd or so. We don't need more LD, so Lindgren doesn't really do much for us, and to take on Trouba would require a bribe pick/ prospect - plus, guaranteed he doesn't waive to go to Columbus. Copp would obviously have to come with an extension, though we honestly don't need Ws more as we need Cs at this point.
All told, too many holes in this trade for me to like it as is.</div></div>
Yeah we’re pretty far off in evaluations here. Trouba’s market value is somewhere between Risto and Jones in a trade. It’s more than Gavrikov even with an extension. Some would say the difference is more than the value of Robinson.
Lindgren for Rosy is pretty even.
Makes sense for you guys tbh. You fix your RHD issues, Lindgren does everything Gavi does while being younger and has team control. Copp gives you a 2C that can actually play D and does everything Rosy can do offensively. A pretty clear upgrade there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
30 mars à 17 h 32
Sujet:
Giving it a try
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Drshnuckels91</b></div><div>have u watched Georgiev play over the past 3 seasons?</div></div>
Sure. Georgiev just had the best goaltending game the Rangers have ever had since they kept track of advanced goalie stats (I think it was 6 goals saved above expected). Have you?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 févr. à 11 h 42
Sujet:
MTL links
Interesting deals if you Drop Kravtsov and add Caufield to the Chiarot (negative value) deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 déc. 2021 à 22 h 1
Sujet:
Different Move
Interesting Rangers deal if you drop Kravtsov, the 1st, and Lundkvist.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 déc. 2021 à 12 h 19
Sujet:
Trading Deadline
Interesting deal if you swap Kravtsov + 1st for like.... Goodrow and a 3rd lol
1
2
Suivant
Page 1