SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

87 percent NYR dont win pick1

Créé par: fluff118
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 6 juill. 2020
Publié: 13 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think this is an incredible team. 4 lines that can actually play hockey.

Smith/Anisimov deal seems fair now as edited.

Saw mostly happy reviews from Rangers and Wild fans about a proposed Georgiev for Hartman+2nd, and am curious how much that approval changes when Hartman is replaced by Greenway. I like this trade much better from NYR perspective.

Strome for TBL 1st has been thrown around a lot and gets mixed reviews. Adding a 2020 5th evens it out a tiny bit more and should be an accept from all parties. Perhaps upgrade the 5th to a 4th.

Justin Braun signed for 2 years is a Seattle exposure requirement.

Alternative Lias trade = Lias for 2x 20213rd rd picks
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
55 450 000 $
22 650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Greenway, Jordan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
2.
NYR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
SJS
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
3.
NYR
  1. Faksa, Radek [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Howden, Brett
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
4.
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
5.
OTT
  1. Smith, Brendan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TBL
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 324 800 $0 $8 362 500 $8 175 200 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
730 000 $730 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 49
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
No from DAL. Make it Howden+2nd and they might bite.
SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: justaBoss
No from DAL. Make it Howden+2nd and they might bite.


I would do Howden +4th for Faksa straight with no pick coming back.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 205
Mentions "j'aime": 25
*87.5%
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Pretty much all of these look good.

The Ottawa trade does not. Smith vs. Anisimov is pretty even, Rangers adding way too much there.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 55
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Sagecoll
Pretty much all of these look good.

The Ottawa trade does not. Smith vs. Anisimov is pretty even, Rangers adding way too much there.


I changed it to Smith+4th for Anisimov straight up. I don't think Ottawa has any real incentive to do this trade, so there has to be something of value going to them to make them interested.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Would rather hold onto the 2nd round pick instead of Andersson. It was Holland/Wright that were high on him during the trade so you’d probably be best trying to trade with Edmonton.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 57
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,113
Mentions "j'aime": 12,141
Quoting: justaBoss
No from DAL. Make it Howden+2nd and they might bite.


I would rather just get the 2nd. Brett Howden is not good.
13 juill. 2020 à 13 h 59
#8
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,694
Mentions "j'aime": 6,783
I'll take my chances. We've needed that franchise, homegrown, centerpiece. Go Canes.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
SJS doesn’t do that for cap purposes.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 8
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I would rather just get the 2nd. Brett Howden is not good.


I'd want 2nd+3rd for Faksa. Howden works as the 3rd.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 8
#11
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: fluff118
I would do Howden +4th for Faksa straight with no pick coming back.


Not interested.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 9
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: BStinson
Would rather hold onto the 2nd round pick instead of Andersson. It was Holland/Wright that were high on him during the trade so you’d probably be best trying to trade with Edmonton.


Would you do it for the 2 3rds?
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: justaBoss
I'd want 2nd+3rd for Faksa. Howden works as the 3rd.


The lowest reasonable trade for NYR is Howden +2nd for Faksa + 3rd. If that is still too much then it probably isn't happening.

Even NYR might say no to that one actually.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 23
#14
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,752
Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
Quoting: fluff118
The lowest reasonable trade for NYR is Howden +2nd for Faksa + 3rd. If that is still too much then it probably isn't happening.

Even NYR might say no to that one actually.


Then it's a no. DAL has no need to move Faksa, and especially no need to move him for a low amount.
SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 24
#15
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 8,059
Mentions "j'aime": 1,470
Trading Georgiev makes zero sense
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 33
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: DoubleADoubleK
Trading Georgiev makes zero sense


I see this a lot, and I used to agree, but the more time I have spent thinking about it:

If you think Georgiev can be a top 30 goalie in this league, then you trade him.

Lets say you re sign him for 2 years, AND lets assume that he gets 20-30 games in the '21 season, and another 15-25 in the '22 season prior to the TDL. (The biggest assumption there is that somehow someway Hank is not playing at all in '21).

Now, at that point in time you are trading him. Period. There is 0 reason to keep him. 1) He wil want to be a starter on another team. 2) His value will have gone up slightly. 3) If you re-sign him, he will demand to be paid, but at the end of the '21 season, Shesty should have been locked up long term for 4-5m/8. Then you are paying too much for a 2nd goaile that will play 25ish games.

So the biggest things to consider now become: 1) How much will his value have gone up after those 40-50 games, and 2) If you traded him as proposed right now, do you feel comfortable with a UFA backup goaltender for '22, or do you feel comfortable with a callup like Wall or Huska, or do you not feel comfortable with either?

Unless the answer to question 1) is that his value has gone up to warrant a mid-late 1st rd pick, then it isn't worth hanging on to him.

Of course that is my opinion, but I have spent a lot of time going back and forth on the issue and have settled on this perspective for now.
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 49
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,300
Mentions "j'aime": 2,732
Quoting: fluff118
The lowest reasonable trade for NYR is Howden +2nd for Faksa + 3rd. If that is still too much then it probably isn't happening.

Even NYR might say no to that one actually.


It might be a no anyways. Assuming the Stars protect the top six and Dickie, we wouldn’t be able to protect Howden anyways. Which isn’t the end of the world, but it gives them something other than Pavelski to look at and I’d really like them to take Pavelski. All that said, Boss is correct. Ask for Faksa would be a second and a third and Howden counts as the third. Which is being generous
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 49
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,021
Mentions "j'aime": 641
Not a massive fan of the Detroit trade as a Detroit fan. It makes more sense to exchange prospects who could use a change in scenery. Cholowski?
13 juill. 2020 à 14 h 58
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
That's a big NO from SJS.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 5
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: fluff118
Would you do it for the 2 3rds?


No, he isn’t ED exempt and doesn’t have a spot on the club so he’d be Grand Rapids bound and wouldn’t be getting prime minutes. We just aren’t a great fit for him anymore. Georgiev would be one of the only things of interest that your shipping off.
13 juill. 2020 à 15 h 43
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,268
Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
Change the Tampa pick to our 2nd rounder and maybe.
13 juill. 2020 à 16 h 55
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Change the Tampa pick to our 2nd rounder and maybe.


Strome without the 5th, for your 2nd + COL 2nd.
13 juill. 2020 à 16 h 55
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 117
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: BStinson
No, he isn’t ED exempt and doesn’t have a spot on the club so he’d be Grand Rapids bound and wouldn’t be getting prime minutes. We just aren’t a great fit for him anymore. Georgiev would be one of the only things of interest that your shipping off.


Fair enough, appreciate the insight.
13 juill. 2020 à 18 h 45
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,268
Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
Quoting: fluff118
Strome without the 5th, for your 2nd + COL 2nd.


Too much for us to give up. I'd probably go with the first option if I had to choose between the two.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage