Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins go all in for next season

Créé par: braisman
Date de création initiale: mar 26, 2020
Publié: Mar 26 at 7:48 pm
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Explications
Hopefully Chara takes a 1 mill base salary with a easily attainable bonus. Give Krug 8 years in order to keep the cap hit lower. Obviously this deal will not age well, but the core window is closing and our prospect system is bad too. We can rebuild in 3-4 years. Hopefully Hall takes slightly less money for max term and the best chance to win.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Kuhlman, Karson1750 000 $
Bjork, Anders11 200 000 $
DeBrusk, Jake22 850 000 $
Vladar, Daniel2800 000 $
UFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Chara, Zdeno11 000 000 $
Krug, Torey87 250 000 $
Hall, Taylor78 500 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. 2020 3e round pick (CBJ)
LAK
  1. Moore, John
BOS
  1. 2020 2e round pick (COL)
  2. 2021 3e round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • David Backes: 1 500 000 $ (25%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
BOS
COL
BOS
CBJ
BOS
BOS
BOS
2021
BOS
BOS
BOS
SJS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
2022
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 084 758 $0 $425 000 $415 242 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
BOS
Marchand, Brad
6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
BOS
Bergeron, Patrice
6 875 000 $
C
NMC NTC
UFA - 2
BOS
Pastrnak, David
6 666 666 $
AD
UFA - 3
Hall, Taylor
8 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
BOS
Krejci, David
7 250 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 1
BOS
Kase, Ondrej
2 600 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
BOS
DeBrusk, Jake
2 850 000 $
AG
RFA
BOS
Coyle, Charlie
5 250 000 $
C, AD
NMC NTC
UFA - 6
BOS
Bjork, Anders
1 200 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
BOS
Ritchie, Nick
1 498 925 $
AG
RFA - 1
BOS
Kuraly, Sean
1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
BOS
Wagner, Chris
1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
BOS
Lindholm, Pär
850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
BOS
Kuhlman, Karson
750 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
BOS
Chara, Zdeno
1 000 000 $
DG
UFA
BOS
McAvoy, Charlie
4 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
BOS
Rask, Tuukka
7 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 1
BOS
Krug, Torey
7 250 000 $
DG
UFA
BOS
Carlo, Brandon
2 850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
BOS
Vladar, Daniel
800 000 $
G
RFA
BOS
Lauzon, Jérémy
850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
BOS
Clifton, Connor
1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
BOS
Vaakanainen, Urho
894 167 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mar à 21 h 56
#26
Rejoint: aoû 2019
Messages: 3,696
Mentions "j'aime": 965
Quoting: KennyBoi
well theres ur first problem, ur only looking at stats


Also by many prospect experts rankings, draft predictions ETC
26 mar à 21 h 59
#27
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 513
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


Based on the people you are mentioning, what @ON3M4N said is the case. The reason people are rating them so low is the guys already with the nHL.
Guy you didnt mention:
Senyshyn (Still middle 6 potential, played well in the NHL)
Kuhlman (Top 6 potential, already playing well)
Zboril (still decent potential, not A level, but not "bottom pair")
Frederick (middle 6, grinder)
Lauzon (Already looking like a good defensive guy)
Keyser, Swayman (both goalies excelling in their respective leagues, OHL and College respectively)

And i am still probably missing some

Plus everything @bhavikp27 said below:

Quoting: bhavikp27
Beecher: Wasn't playing top minutes, yet he was 3rd in pts/GP among forwards
Lauko: first pro season, mostly had a bottom-6 role and suffered injury at WJC
Vaakanainen: He is NOT going to be an offensive dman. He is more defensive and is in his second year in the AHL
Steen: also limited to a bottom-6 role but started playing C around January and adjusting his game

And this:




Bruins have a much better pool of YOUNG PLAYERS than they are given credit for, perhaps the term "prospect" should be fixed, but to say the bruins dont have an amazing future moving forward is a complete lie. Prospect rankings mean nothing to me and other intelligent fans at the moment
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 22 h 06
#28
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


that is a bit of an extent
26 mar à 22 h 12
#29
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: bsilk18
Based on the people you are mentioning, what @ON3M4N said is the case. The reason people are rating them so low is the guys already with the nHL.
Guy you didnt mention:
Senyshyn (Still middle 6 potential, played well in the NHL)
Kuhlman (Top 6 potential, already playing well)
Zboril (still decent potential, not A level, but not "bottom pair")
Frederick (middle 6, grinder)
Lauzon (Already looking like a good defensive guy)
Keyser, Swayman (both goalies excelling in their respective leagues, OHL and College respectively)

And i am still probably missing some

Plus everything @bhavikp27 said below:





Bruins have a much better pool of YOUNG PLAYERS than they are given credit for, perhaps the term "prospect" should be fixed, but to say the bruins dont have an amazing future moving forward is a complete lie. Prospect rankings mean nothing to me and other intelligent fans at the moment


I hate to break it to you but, every team has goalies that are good in the juniors.

senyshyn and zboril are busts (at best senyshyn will be a 4th liner)
no way kuhlman has top 6 potential
of course everyone is being harsh about how they have no prospects which is simply not true, but your overeating them.
26 mar à 22 h 39
#30
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 547
Mentions "j'aime": 115
Quoting: papishark
Also by many prospect experts rankings, draft predictions ETC


Quoting: bhavikp27
Beecher: Wasn't playing top minutes, yet he was 3rd in pts/GP among forwards
Lauko: first pro season, mostly had a bottom-6 role and suffered injury at WJC
Vaakanainen: He is NOT going to be an offensive dman. He is more defensive and is in his second year in the AHL
Steen: also limited to a bottom-6 role but started playing C around January and adjusting his game

This ^
26 mar à 22 h 47
#31
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: Teemu_salami
I hate to break it to you but, every team has goalies that are good in the juniors.

senyshyn and zboril are busts (at best senyshyn will be a 4th liner)
no way kuhlman has top 6 potential
of course everyone is being harsh about how they have no prospects which is simply not true, but your overeating them.


I'm going to say you don't actually watch any of them play. Although I'll give you Khulman. He's a 3rd liner at best.

Btw Swayman played NCAA, carrying Maine since a freshman. He's a serious contender for the Hobey Baker and Richter.
26 mar à 22 h 49
#32
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: ON3M4N
Feel free to add me to your ignore list then because your going on mine. A few interactions with you is enough for me to know you don't offer much to a hockey conversation.

cheers


I f**king hate Boston but there pool is pretty underrated but it’s underrated because all of there top prospects are now an everyday player for the bruins so people look at that and say nah no good prospects
ON3M4N, bhavikp27 et Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 22 h 50
#33
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: bsilk18
Based on the people you are mentioning, what @ON3M4N said is the case. The reason people are rating them so low is the guys already with the nHL.
Guy you didnt mention:
Senyshyn (Still middle 6 potential, played well in the NHL)
Kuhlman (Top 6 potential, already playing well)
Zboril (still decent potential, not A level, but not "bottom pair")
Frederick (middle 6, grinder)
Lauzon (Already looking like a good defensive guy)
Keyser, Swayman (both goalies excelling in their respective leagues, OHL and College respectively)

And i am still probably missing some

Plus everything @bhavikp27 said below:





Bruins have a much better pool of YOUNG PLAYERS than they are given credit for, perhaps the term "prospect" should be fixed, but to say the bruins dont have an amazing future moving forward is a complete lie. Prospect rankings mean nothing to me and other intelligent fans at the moment

Axel Andersson
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 22 h 55
#34
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: ThomasChaney
Axel Andersson


Like his upside. I think ANH got a good one with him. Maybe another year before going pro
26 mar à 22 h 56
#35
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: ON3M4N
Like his upside. I think ANH got a good one with him. Maybe another year before going pro


Oh yeah I forgot hey traded him
26 mar à 23 h 27
#36
Rejoint: avr 2017
Messages: 172
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Jeuck75
If Hall signs with the Bruins, all the other NHL teams should just pack up and go home.


Wherever Hall signs that team is done. No cups and early playoff exits.
27 mar à 0 h 37
#37
GM CRIME DAWG
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 373
FACT: Being a perennial top team for the last decade should put the prospect pool in the tank and conversely the big club should start to show signs of faltering too. Two good examples to check on would be Bruins and San Josie:
BOS - Chugging along w/ most pts in this c r a p p y paused year etc. etc.!
SJ - Hmmm lottery darlings hiding in the league basement; but ahhhh crap it's OTT that has our giant lottery ballz!!.....
27 mar à 7 h 24
#38
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 3,640
Mentions "j'aime": 1,125
Quoting: Teemu_salami
I hate to break it to you but, every team has goalies that are good in the juniors.


Vladar is in AHL, Keyser ECHL.

Swayman:
-Walter Brown Award winner (best American-born college hockey player in New England)
-Hobey Baker finalist
-named Hockey East Player of the Year
--No NCAA G faced more shots than him this season (1,170)
-34 GP, 2.07 GAA and .939 SV% in his 3rd year

He isn't just a random guy

Quoting: Teemu_salami
senyshyn and zboril are busts (at best senyshyn will be a 4th liner)


Zboril was ranked in 10-20 ranks. He just takes more time to develop and he could play couple of games in the NHL but Bruins have too much depth for that. He's looked better and better this year, from what I've heard

Senyshyn= Not his fault he got drafted in the first. He's more of sniper but the Bruins are a really good defensive team so if you can't play defense, you won't play. That's why he's been playing in the bottom-6 (plus Providence top6 is loaded) and improving his two-way game as a player, but to be able to play in Cassidy's system as well. He will be a good middle-six option.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
27 mar à 9 h 51
#39
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 513
Quoting: Teemu_salami
I hate to break it to you but, every team has goalies that are good in the juniors.

senyshyn and zboril are busts (at best senyshyn will be a 4th liner)
no way kuhlman has top 6 potential
of course everyone is being harsh about how they have no prospects which is simply not true, but your overeating them.


Senyshyn and Zboril are not busts yet, they are getting there, but until they are like 24-25 and still not in the NHL they arent busts. Senyshyn played 4 nhl games and played well in all four of them. And the bruins have too much LHD depth (5 soild NHLers) so zboril cant even get the chance easily.
Kuhlman is fresh out of college and has played pretty well in the top 6 already, so he is 1000% top 6 potential
I am overrating nobody, just trying to be realistic.

Quoting: ThomasChaney
Axel Andersson


They traded Anderson away, but yeah! When he was on the team, nobody included him as a good prospect
27 mar à 10 h 00
#40
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 513
Quoting: ThomasChaney
Oh yeah I forgot hey traded him


Lol u good its a good point smile
27 mar à 12 h 38
#41
Go Wings Go
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 3,292
Fat chance of Sweeney giving Krug that much money and term, I don't see Sweeney giving krug anymore then 6 x 6.75 million at the very most.
28 mar à 0 h 22
#42
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: bsilk18
Senyshyn and Zboril are not busts yet, they are getting there, but until they are like 24-25 and still not in the NHL they arent busts. Senyshyn played 4 nhl games and played well in all four of them. And the bruins have too much LHD depth (5 soild NHLers) so zboril cant even get the chance easily.
Kuhlman is fresh out of college and has played pretty well in the top 6 already, so he is 1000% top 6 potential
I am overrating nobody, just trying to be realistic.

In what world is karson kuhlman a top six forward. thats just like saying rudolfs balcers has top six potential.
28 mar à 10 h 32
#43
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 513
Quoting: Teemu_salami

"In what world is karson kuhlman a top six forward. thats just like saying rudolfs balcers has top six potential."


Im Guessing you meant to say that happy^ (You messed up the formatting)

Karson Kuhlman has "played pretty in the top 6 already" as in when he has he has been good. I didnt say he is already a top 6 forward lol. But he literally is a top 6 potential forward. Thats a fact, thats where he was scouted and projected to be. Kakko is projected to be elite, but based on this year im guessing you would say "idiot, thats like saying john scott is an elite player".
28 mar à 11 h 30
#44
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
there is a difference between a guy that was picked 2nd overall and a guy that was never drafted.
28 mar à 14 h 22
#45
GM CRIME DAWG
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 373
Quoting: Teemu_salami
there is a difference between a guy that was picked 2nd overall and a guy that was never drafted.


Like HOF Adam Oates!?
28 mar à 14 h 37
#46
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: McGruff
Like HOF Adam Oates!?


he was traded to the bruins, and that was a time where signed players were amazing stastny, messier, GRETZKY. it's different now, and I hope u don't believe kuhlman will become a player like Adam Oates.
28 mar à 14 h 55
#47
GM CRIME DAWG
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 373
Quoting: Teemu_salami
he was traded to the bruins, and that was a time where signed players were amazing stastny, messier, GRETZKY. it's different now, and I hope u don't believe kuhlman will become a player like Adam Oates.


He was never drafted...
28 mar à 15 h 05
#48
Rejoint: mar 2020
Messages: 268
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: McGruff
He was never drafted...


IK i was just implying that u knew that
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage