Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins go all in for next season

Créé par: braisman
Date de création initiale: mar 26, 2020
Publié: Mar 26 at 7:48 pm
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Explications
Hopefully Chara takes a 1 mill base salary with a easily attainable bonus. Give Krug 8 years in order to keep the cap hit lower. Obviously this deal will not age well, but the core window is closing and our prospect system is bad too. We can rebuild in 3-4 years. Hopefully Hall takes slightly less money for max term and the best chance to win.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Kuhlman, Karson1750 000 $
Bjork, Anders11 200 000 $
DeBrusk, Jake22 850 000 $
Vladar, Daniel2800 000 $
UFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Chara, Zdeno11 000 000 $
Krug, Torey87 250 000 $
Hall, Taylor78 500 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. 2020 3e round pick (CBJ)
LAK
  1. Moore, John
BOS
  1. 2020 2e round pick (COL)
  2. 2021 3e round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • David Backes: 1 500 000 $ (25%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
BOS
COL
BOS
CBJ
BOS
BOS
BOS
2021
BOS
BOS
BOS
SJS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
2022
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 084 758 $0 $425 000 $415 242 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
BOS
Marchand, Brad
6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
BOS
Bergeron, Patrice
6 875 000 $
C
NMC NTC
UFA - 2
BOS
Pastrnak, David
6 666 666 $
AD
UFA - 3
Hall, Taylor
8 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
BOS
Krejci, David
7 250 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 1
BOS
Kase, Ondrej
2 600 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
BOS
DeBrusk, Jake
2 850 000 $
AG
RFA
BOS
Coyle, Charlie
5 250 000 $
C, AD
NMC NTC
UFA - 6
BOS
Bjork, Anders
1 200 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
BOS
Ritchie, Nick
1 498 925 $
AG
RFA - 1
BOS
Kuraly, Sean
1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
BOS
Wagner, Chris
1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
BOS
Lindholm, Pär
850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
BOS
Kuhlman, Karson
750 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
BOS
Chara, Zdeno
1 000 000 $
DG
UFA
BOS
McAvoy, Charlie
4 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
BOS
Rask, Tuukka
7 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 1
BOS
Krug, Torey
7 250 000 $
DG
UFA
BOS
Carlo, Brandon
2 850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
BOS
Vladar, Daniel
800 000 $
G
RFA
BOS
Lauzon, Jérémy
850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
BOS
Clifton, Connor
1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
BOS
Vaakanainen, Urho
894 167 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mar à 19 h 50
#1
Jeuck75
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 710
Mentions "j'aime": 128
If Hall signs with the Bruins, all the other NHL teams should just pack up and go home.
Leafsfan34 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 19 h 50
#2
Jeuck75
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 710
Mentions "j'aime": 128
Quoting: Jeuck75
If Hall signs with the Bruins, all the other NHL teams should just pack up and go home.


They will be SO GOOD
Leafsfan34 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 03
#3
Banni
Rejoint: fév 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Jeuck75
They will be SO GOOD


Tampa bay should just sell all their prospects and go sicko mode.
But Boston isn't beating St. Louis again
Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 11
#4
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 12
#5
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 3,640
Mentions "j'aime": 1,125
Quoting: Leafsfan34
Tampa bay should just sell all their prospects and go sicko mode.
But Boston isn't beating St. Louis again


If they got refs again and Berube got his goons, yes otherwise no chance for STL
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 17
#6
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 3,640
Mentions "j'aime": 1,125
It would be so stupid to sign Hall

Would be so good to have DeBrusk at that price but he probably gets a bit more

Moore's worth less, Grzelcyk more

Krug probably gets 5-6Y
26 mar à 20 h 37
#7
Rejoint: aoû 2019
Messages: 3,696
Mentions "j'aime": 969
Why are the sharks giving you a second and a third for a meh bottom pairing D?
26 mar à 20 h 37
#8
Rejoint: aoû 2019
Messages: 3,696
Mentions "j'aime": 969
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


Its one of the worst in the league and has only gotten worse this year. Why do you think its good?
Salzy a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 38
#9
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,827
Mentions "j'aime": 695
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...
Salzy et Klara a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 50
#10
Banni
Rejoint: fév 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: bhavikp27
If they got refs again and Berube got his goons, yes otherwise no chance for STL


There are no good refs in the playoffs. The playoffs have different rules
26 mar à 20 h 54
#11
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 514
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


People dont believe the bruins prospect pool is as good as it is.
I agree with you, but have you seen some of the rankings? Bruins are at like 27+ on most of them.
Im with you that its wrong, but people seem to think otherwise frown
26 mar à 20 h 55
#12
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: Sagecoll
Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...


Haha I don't give a flying f#*& what those things say. The Athletic isn't worth what it cost and 95% of ther content is garbage.
Silkysmooth42 et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 56
#13
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,827
Mentions "j'aime": 695
Quoting: ON3M4N
Haha I don't give a flying f#*& what those things say. The Athletic isn't worth what it cost and 95% of ther content is garbage.


That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.
Teemu_salami et Klara a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 56
#14
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 514
Quoting: Sagecoll
Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...


Yeah i have seen these rankings too and i poitned it out.
Its pretty sad that people are underestimating the bruins prospects that much, but reguardless, the truth is that the bruins have a deep and strong prospect pool. No A level talents, but B level prospects and plentiful
26 mar à 20 h 57
#15
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: papishark
Its one of the worst in the league and has only gotten worse this year. Why do you think its good?


It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.
Silkysmooth42, bhavikp27 et McGruff a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 20 h 58
#16
Silkysmooth
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,976
Mentions "j'aime": 514
Quoting: Sagecoll
That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.


No ... @ON3M4N is right here .. Bruins have a severly underrated prospect pool. Not to mention the Athletic hates Boston lol, they constantly have anti-bruins articles
26 mar à 20 h 58
#17
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: papishark
Why are the sharks giving you a second and a third for a meh bottom pairing D?


This right here proves you know nothing about the Bruins system or its players. Grz would be a top 4 on a good amount of teams, but is behind Krug & Chara.
26 mar à 20 h 59
#18
Rejoint: aoû 2019
Messages: 3,696
Mentions "j'aime": 969
Quoting: ON3M4N
It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.


Yeah then those arent prospects anymore. Those are young players
26 mar à 21 h 00
#19
Rejoint: aoû 2019
Messages: 3,696
Mentions "j'aime": 969
Quoting: ON3M4N
This right here proves you know nothing about the Bruins system or its players. Grz would be a top 4 on a good amount of teams, but is behind Krug & Chara.


He wouldnt be on the sharks, so thats really all I need to know. If hes great and cheap theres no need for you to trade him
26 mar à 21 h 01
#20
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: Sagecoll
That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.


Feel free to add me to your ignore list then because your going on mine. A few interactions with you is enough for me to know you don't offer much to a hockey conversation.

cheers
26 mar à 21 h 03
#21
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: papishark
Yeah then those arent prospects anymore. Those are young players


I'll take good young NHL players over being highly ranked in some half baked prospect analysis any day.
26 mar à 21 h 04
#22
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,827
Mentions "j'aime": 695
Quoting: bsilk18
Yeah i have seen these rankings too and i poitned it out.
Its pretty sad that people are underestimating the bruins prospects that much, but reguardless, the truth is that the bruins have a deep and strong prospect pool. No A level talents, but B level prospects and plentiful


Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...
papishark a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 21 h 04
#23
Ignore List 34
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,768
Quoting: papishark
He wouldnt be on the sharks, so thats really all I need to know. If hes great and cheap theres no need for you to trade him


I wouldn't trade him
26 mar à 21 h 25
#24
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 547
Mentions "j'aime": 115
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


well theres ur first problem, ur only looking at stats
bhavikp27 et ON3M4N a aimé ceci.
26 mar à 21 h 30
#25
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 3,640
Mentions "j'aime": 1,125
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


Beecher: Wasn't playing top minutes, yet he was 3rd in pts/GP among forwards
Lauko: first pro season, mostly had a bottom-6 role and suffered injury at WJC
Vaakanainen: He is NOT going to be an offensive dman. He is more defensive and is in his second year in the AHL
Steen: also limited to a bottom-6 role but started playing C around January and adjusting his game


And this:
Quoting: ON3M4N
It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage