SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood

Membre depuis
29 mai 2018
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Jets de Winnipeg
Messages dans les forums
24997
Messages par jour
11.6
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 11 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 11 h 49
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>A. they aren't in the strongest conference.
B. WSH and BOS are very sketch top 10 teams if you even want to call them that. Hell they aren't even in the top 6 of their conference.
They are both going backwards, they are both old as dirt, and they both have massive holes throughout their roster.
Jesus, you take teams who are only playoff teams because the rest of their divisions are bad, and you try to call them top 10 teams.
OTT isn't a good team this year, that does not mean they won't be a good team next year. FFS, they are loaded with high end prospect talent that should be making Jumps into the NHL next year.
Hell just the improvement to their blue line next year should boost the team significantly.</div></div>

Okay I know this isn't your strong area so I'll walk you through it.

As we currently sit, 8 of the top 12 teams in Points percentage (this is the most accurate way to gauge success at this point since it does take into account the different number of games teams have played) are all in the eastern conference. The 4 teams in the west in the top 12 are Colorado, Minnesota, St Louis and Calgary. Their records are boosted because they in fact do play in the weaker conference since the Pacific is almost entirely in the bottom half of the league and after Nashville there isn't a team in the Central thats at all good.

Meanwhile Ottawa is 27th in points percentage. That is an awfully big gulf to span there.

Numbers are really not that hard to understand if someone wants to.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 11 h 35
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs101</b></div><div>i'm not arguing that they don't lead it and do the heavy lifting, but there's only so much lifting they can do, depth matters.

i added to my last comment since you responded too, that should address some of this

St louis had huge depth contribution - Robert Thomas as a rookie, Maroon scoring that OTW goal, etc etc. Same with the other teams you mentioned. Stars lead it, but need help from the rest of the lineup.

You NEED star power to win, but star power ALONE and the just an average team otherwise is not enough.</div></div>

Of course depth matters, however the difference between the various depth players around the league is quite small. Finding the right fit can see a depth guy go from a 4th liner to a top 6 player. Look at Hyman as an example, is he really capable of making a major difference on his own? Not in the slightest but good chemistry with Matthews and Marner and he gets 5.5 million, is he any better than Bunting? Maybe the difference is so small.

So getting extra depth guys at major costs that don't really change the team and absolutely come with a risk of being less than what we have already isn't wise.

In my mind TO should load up for this playoff. But my idea of loading up isn't changing the entire defence, it's upgrading Holl if you can and adding another NHL defenceman (possibly in the same move if possible). Have Holl slide down to the 3rd pair with Sandin after adding Severson or Klingberg and now you have 8 NHL defenceman. One of our Lefties get hurt and you have Dermott on the bottom pair? I can live with that. Or two guys get hurt and you have Schenn instead of Biega as your #8, that's good news. Spending big for guys who aren't really that much of an improvement or not one at all like Hakanpaa, Schenn, Mayfield, Lyubushkin, etc etc won't move the needle and cost more than it's worth. Sometimes less is more.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 11 h 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs101</b></div><div>I tend to be inbetween the "physicality doesn't matter" and "its more important than skill" schools of thought. Of course you win or lose on your skill, but having physicality means your skill players aren't taking beatings without your team dishing it back. It means their players can't get into the crease so easily. And I do think you're underestimating Manson as a solid defensive defenceman who doesn't take so many penalties in that fashion. That said, Severson is also a solid option - might cost a lot more though.

And look, say what you will, but cup winning teams often do add big heavy defencemen and it often works - see Savard to Tampa.</div></div>

That is connecting dots that have nothing to do with each other. When a team wins the cup, many point to some depth addition as the reason they won and that is entirely nonsense. Savard was of little importance. The Lightning won thanks to their stars. It's always the stars who do the heavy lifting and very few stars go around hitting everyone.

I also think "grit" and "hitting" are looked at as being the same and have little to do with each other. Good players fight through anything, Crosby gets targetted in the playoffs and just fights through it to win. Same with the Tampa stars. If TO is going to succeed in the playoffs. Matthews will need to enforce his will on every series, be the best player and want it more than anyone else. When that happens, all you really want is for everyone else to do your job. The team has proven they are a top team and their system calls for certain things.

They need to stay within that and then keep doing it consistently. If you really watch what leads to their breakdowns it's always transition where they took a bigger chance than they needed to. Limit that and they'll be a force. They are better defensively than Florida and Tampa from a GA/G point of view, how do they really improve that without damaging what makes them such a strong team? Changing 66% of their right side for tough guys who have little puck skills doesn't really help and could harm the teams possession in a big way.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 10 h 44
Forum: Armchair-GM16 févr. 2022 à 10 h 8