SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/General Fantasy Talk

Who do u take at 3 in fantasy

11 sept. 2017 à 17 h 4
#1
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 5,550
Mentions "j'aime": 661
Mcdavid and Crosby go 1&2. Who are u taking at 3?
11 sept. 2017 à 17 h 39
#2
VegasGMV2.LeafsGMV1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,918
Mentions "j'aime": 177
Backstrom or Kucherov....Probably Backstrom I guess
11 sept. 2017 à 17 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 5,550
Mentions "j'aime": 661
I'm thinking Kane
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2017 à 18 h 29
#4
VegasGMV2.LeafsGMV1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,918
Mentions "j'aime": 177
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
I'm thinking Kane


He would be my 5
11 sept. 2017 à 18 h 47
#5
Habs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 409
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Kane or Burns.
11 sept. 2017 à 20 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,711
Mentions "j'aime": 2,820
Karlsson
11 sept. 2017 à 21 h 46
#7
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,923
Mentions "j'aime": 4,651
#3 i'd take Matthews ... Crosby would not go #2, he'd go #4 for me, mostly because of injuries ...
1 - McDavid
2 - Doughty
3 - Matthews
4 - Crosby
5 - not sure ... Eichel maybe? Or maybe Draisaitl?
11 sept. 2017 à 22 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,711
Mentions "j'aime": 2,820
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
#3 i'd take Matthews ... Crosby would not go #2, he'd go #4 for me, mostly because of injuries ...
1 - McDavid
2 - Doughty
3 - Matthews
4 - Crosby
5 - not sure ... Eichel maybe? Or maybe Draisaitl?


No just no
Pasta88Sauce, Kotkaniemi15, Caufzi and 4 others a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2017 à 22 h 38
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,711
Mentions "j'aime": 2,820
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
#3 i'd take Matthews ... Crosby would not go #2, he'd go #4 for me, mostly because of injuries ...
1 - McDavid
2 - Doughty
3 - Matthews
4 - Crosby
5 - not sure ... Eichel maybe? Or maybe Draisaitl?


if everything was "because of injuries", Palmieri would go 1st overall.
mhockey91 et nobody a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2017 à 22 h 51
#10
Démarrer sujet
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 5,550
Mentions "j'aime": 661
Quoting: boltscharge17
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
#3 i'd take Matthews ... Crosby would not go #2, he'd go #4 for me, mostly because of injuries ...
1 - McDavid
2 - Doughty
3 - Matthews
4 - Crosby
5 - not sure ... Eichel maybe? Or maybe Draisaitl?


if everything was "because of injuries", Palmieri would go 1st overall.


What kind of fantasy league takes doughty at third lmao
Pasta88Sauce, LicMysak, Kotkaniemi15 and 5 others a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2017 à 23 h 34
#11
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,292
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
I honestly might not even take Crosby at 2. His all around game has rounded out to a point where I'd probably take Karlsson or Burns at 2. Getting production from the blueline is a necessity in hockey. You can find scoring forwards in the later rounds of the draft, but there is a huge dip in the production from defensemen after Karlsson, Burns and Hedman.
Rangsey a aimé ceci.
12 sept. 2017 à 7 h 29
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,873
Mentions "j'aime": 163
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
I'm thinking Kane


not even close....he is 1-dimensional
12 sept. 2017 à 7 h 36
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Honestly depends on the scoring structure for the fantasy league.
A_K et Jdp a aimé ceci.
12 sept. 2017 à 8 h 5
#14
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
I'd take Karlsson in a normal season, but since he's out for an unknown time I'd take Burns.
12 sept. 2017 à 12 h 16
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
I keep going back and fourth. At #3 I'm be torn between Patty Kane, Burns or Karlsson.

Kane - over the last 3 years only McDavid has a better P/GP

Burns - He's basically a winger on defense. Gives you a lot of points for the position and has played all 82 games for 3 straight years

Karlsson - Better point producer than Burns over the last 3 years, but he could miss time. With such a high pick do I want my 1st player missing time
12 sept. 2017 à 13 h 48
#16
Follow capfriendly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 1336
Messages: 2,666
Mentions "j'aime": 1,918
Quoting: ON3M4N
Honestly depends on the scoring structure for the fantasy league.


This is the answer right here, what's the fantasy league rules?
12 sept. 2017 à 13 h 54
#17
Below Market Value
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,426
Mentions "j'aime": 1,324
Most fantasy leagues base almost everything on offense. So in that case I'd go:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Kucherov
4. Karlsson
5. Burns
13 sept. 2017 à 14 h 56
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 10
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Based on Goals + Assists:

1 - McDavid
2 - Kucherov
3 - Benn
noahphillipss a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2017 à 12 h 48
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
Most fantasy leagues base almost everything on offense. So in that case I'd go:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Kucherov
4. Karlsson
5. Burns


See I have to think that after McDavid/Crosby you look at a high scoring d-man because those are very rare. You'll always find forward to contribute, but if you can get significant points out of your d-group, that is HUGE in fantasy because most teams wont have that luxury. The spread last year between Burns #1 scoring d-man and #4 was 20 points. Now obviously McDavid skews it a bit, but if you look at Crosby at #2 w/ 89 pts, you'd have to go down #17 to find a 20 point difference.
Mapleleaf05 a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2017 à 22 h 9
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
#3 i'd take Matthews ... Crosby would not go #2, he'd go #4 for me, mostly because of injuries ...
1 - McDavid
2 - Doughty
3 - Matthews
4 - Crosby
5 - not sure ... Eichel maybe? Or maybe Draisaitl?


Definitely not Doughty #2. How would you take him as the #1 D? How would you take him over Crosby, Karlsson? Doughty should be around the 20th player taken. Kane, Kucherov, Mathews, Draisatl, Backstrom, Stamkos, Malkin, Burns, Hedman, Ovechkin should all be taken before Doughty. Probably could name 10 more guys even.
16 sept. 2017 à 22 h 10
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
#1 Mcdavid
#2 Crosby
#3 Karlsson
#4 Kane
#5 Mathews
16 sept. 2017 à 22 h 13
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: ON3M4N
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
Most fantasy leagues base almost everything on offense. So in that case I'd go:

1. McDavid
2. Crosby
3. Kucherov
4. Karlsson
5. Burns


See I have to think that after McDavid/Crosby you look at a high scoring d-man because those are very rare. You'll always find forward to contribute, but if you can get significant points out of your d-group, that is HUGE in fantasy because most teams wont have that luxury. The spread last year between Burns #1 scoring d-man and #4 was 20 points. Now obviously McDavid skews it a bit, but if you look at Crosby at #2 w/ 89 pts, you'd have to go down #17 to find a 20 point difference.


Wow that is very interesting. Definitely changed my mind about not wanting to take a d man with my first pick. Would you take Karlsson or Burns first?
8 oct. 2017 à 18 h 26
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Jesus these are bad. It’s a no brainer:

1-Mcdavid OR crosby
2-
3- Kane

Idk why you base your fantasy scores off of, but in my league if you did something other than this everyone would laugh at you
9 oct. 2017 à 5 h 58
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Modifié 9 oct. 2017 à 8 h 19
Quoting: Mapleleaf05


Wow that is very interesting. Definitely changed my mind about not wanting to take a d man with my first pick. Would you take Karlsson or Burns first?


Burns is more durable and has more talent around him IMO. Also depends if were talking a 1 a done year league or a dynasty league.
9 oct. 2017 à 6 h 53
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,552
Mentions "j'aime": 3,052
Like ON3M4N said, is this a one year thing or a keeper league?

Either way, I'd take Karlsson, especially if blocks, shots, ATOI, and defensive points are included as categories
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage