SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This would be the perfect offseason - thoughts

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 19 mai 2024
Publié: 19 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think from a value perspective, all of these trades can happen. Easier said than done though. It just comes down to what each team is looking for in a return.

Ullmark is worth a late first rounder, which NJ's 2025 pick will likely be, especially considering how weak the metro is at the moment. a top 3 spot is theirs to lose. I can't imagine they value their picks a whole ton considering how young they are.

Rossi's trade value is tough to gauge. Lysell is the main piece heading back. I've heard they're looking for bigger forwards, so Frederic is a fitting return. He's still only 26 so fits their timeframe well and can plug right into their middle 6 and score roughly 20 goals a year. I'd be ok with adding a first if needed, instead of the second and/or third. Seems like Rossi's stock has dropped a fair amount since draft year, but that's pretty normal.

I know the canes are looking for a second line center, so coyle would be a natural return, but his value is probably lower, so adding the first makes sense and should even it out pretty well. Both players had similar years production wise, coyle is better defensively and on the dot, but Necas is younger and has more upside. I think this trade is pretty fair and realistic. And contract wise, probably around 6m or so? Tough to gauge.

Aho, Jones, Maroon, and Heinen all fitting depth pieces that I like. But depth isn't their issue lol.

Swayman, roughly a 7x7 seems fair. Hasn't proven himself quite enough, but has shown clear potential after this playoff run so it's hard to argue against it. 7-7.5 seems about right.

Debrusk is probably somewhere around 5-6m, I could see someone paying him a hair over 6 on the open market, but it sounds like he wants to stick here. I don't think management brings him back unfortunately.

The Lindholm contract is anyone's guess... barring a cup run from VAN with Lindholm being a key factor, I see his value around 7m or so on the market. His contract won't age well but it is what it is, no other options are out there.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
77 000 000 $
46 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
1775 000 $
77 250 000 $
65 250 000 $
1775 000 $
31 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
2.
MIN
  1. Frederic, Trent
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Coyle, Charlie
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $83 904 167 $50 000 $1 180 000 $3 795 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 mai à 18 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,962
Mentions "j'aime": 3,102
Canes aren’t touching that

Goalies don’t have that value
19 mai à 18 h 40
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,209
Mentions "j'aime": 1,418
I think you did a good job trying to make it realistic. I find Lindholm dangerously overrated so I would be terrified of that contract personally.
dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 18 h 45
#3
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: jfkst1
I think you did a good job trying to make it realistic. I find Lindholm dangerously overrated so I would be terrified of that contract personally.


I think he's a little overrated too, and this is definitely an overpayment. The perfect world contract for him is probably about the 4x6 Taylor Hall signed back in 2021.

There are two reasons I would sign this contract:

1: There is no other option at center as far as UFAs or trading goes, so having him during pasta's prime is better than running back what we know doesn't work

2: He can play right wing pretty well too, so if this contract does end up aging poorly, he can be a middle six winger for the final couple years. And if they do happen to find a center in the meantime, same thing. That would be an excellent problem to have
19 mai à 18 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: ecupirate07
Canes aren’t touching that

Goalies don’t have that value

A vezina winner can get a late first rounder imo. I wouldn't be shocked if the Canes took that offer, they desperately need a 2c
FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 18 h 52
#5
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 24,255
Mentions "j'aime": 12,718
Can't see Boston trading Coyle.
Gofnut999 et Quaider11 a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 18 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Can't see Boston trading Coyle.


Same, even if it would benefit them. I like coyle so it's hard to trade him, but no doubt they need some offensive spark in the lineup
19 mai à 19 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Coyle isn't going anywhere, but I do like the idea of bringing in Necas.
Trmaus12 a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 19 h 9
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 157
Mentions "j'aime": 40
This offer doesn't get you Rossi. Not what Wild want for Rossi, Rossi's stock hasn't dropped either with all due respect.
19 mai à 19 h 11
#9
Good nerd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 964
Mentions "j'aime": 528
I don't see the Canes doing that. They needed a 2C, but now I think they are entering a soft retool. They might still be competitive, but by the time they work the kinks out with the young guys, Coyle's contract will be up and he will be up there in age. They need a better long term solution.
19 mai à 19 h 15
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,583
Mentions "j'aime": 1,880
Quoting: jfkst1
I think you did a good job trying to make it realistic. I find Lindholm dangerously overrated so I would be terrified of that contract personally.


There are three ways to acquire a player

1. Free agency
2. Player Development / Draft
3. Trades

We lack draft capital and our prospect list has been depleted. The open issue with free agency is you likely have to overpay in terms of term and Lindholm is no exception.
19 mai à 19 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,257
Mentions "j'aime": 9,050
Quoting: ecupirate07


Goalies don’t have that value


Since when?

Kuemper - 1st/Timmins/cond 3rd

B’s traded Jones - 1st/Kuraly

Varly - 1st

Vokoun -1st/2nd/cond 2nd

Schneider - 9th overall pick

Just a few examples.
FoxYou727, Trmaus12, dons_weeney and 2 others a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 19 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,257
Mentions "j'aime": 9,050
Modifié 19 mai à 21 h 14
Quoting: Fenner17
Coyle isn't going anywhere, but I do like the idea of bringing in Necas.


I like Necas as a target as well, but Coyle is a better all around option than Necas. You can keep Coyle and add cheaper, one dimensional, offense in free agency and be better off.
Trmaus12, Quaider11 et Fenner17 a aimé ceci.
19 mai à 20 h 26
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 564
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Rossi feels redundant when we already have Poitras

I will admit that if Rossi were to fully max out his potential it could be a better than Poitras’
19 mai à 21 h 3
#14
Démarrer sujet
Best armchair GM yet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 182
Quoting: Quaider11
Rossi feels redundant when we already have Poitras

I will admit that if Rossi were to fully max out his potential it could be a better than Poitras’


Bergeron/Krejci was a solid duo for a while, I'd be good with 2 top centers haha. Lindholm probably only has another 3ish years of being able to hold that role down, which is good timing with Poitras/Rossi to fully take over 1 and 2 c
19 mai à 21 h 35
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,209
Mentions "j'aime": 1,418
Quoting: Celtics21
There are three ways to acquire a player

1. Free agency
2. Player Development / Draft
3. Trades

We lack draft capital and our prospect list has been depleted. The open issue with free agency is you likely have to overpay in terms of term and Lindholm is no exception.


I've already told you Lindholm will be ZERO upgrade over Coyle for a lot more money. I hope Sweeney signs him to this deal. I expect him to be a liability from day one.
19 mai à 22 h 44
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 257
Dont see BOS moving Coyle or MIN moving Rossi

Like Necas as a target, but not Lindholm at that term

Theres better 3LD options than Aho and Id think Bussi would beat out Martin Jones for backup spot, the 34yo veteran goalie can sit in Providence, rather see what they got in Bussi

This is a good team you constructed though, much improvement in the top 9
dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
20 mai à 11 h 37
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 564
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: dons_weeney
Bergeron/Krejci was a solid duo for a while, I'd be good with 2 top centers haha. Lindholm probably only has another 3ish years of being able to hold that role down, which is good timing with Poitras/Rossi to fully take over 1 and 2 c

I just feel like it could be hard to win in the playoffs with the top 2 centers being 5’11 and 5’9
Then again if this new generation of “undersized” centers (Jack Hughes, Celebrini, etc.) can cut it at an elite level I don’t see why Rossi would be any different
dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage