SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins solidify the Center position

Créé par: kscoop
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 17 mai 2024
Publié: 17 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 250 000 $
2850 000 $
77 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
24 250 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $85 840 834 $50 000 $330 000 $1 859 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mai à 9 h 33
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,215
Mentions "j'aime": 25,643
Sens decline
Gofnut999 et StutzlesNumber1Fan a aimé ceci.
17 mai à 9 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,264
Mentions "j'aime": 9,054
Modifié 17 mai à 10 h 1
Quoting: csick
Sens decline


What he said.


Ottawa returns Boston’s 24 1st and prospect for Ullmark. Might work for both teams. Now convince Ullmark to waive. Good luck with that. Sens better open the vault with a ridiculous overpay extension to get him to consider .
17 mai à 10 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Quoting: Gofnut999
What he said.


Ottawa returns Boston’s 24 1st and prospect for Ullmark. Might work for both teams. Now convince Ullmark to waive. Good luck with that. Sens better open the vault with a ridiculous overpay extension to get him to consider .


Don’t even think it will require a ridiculous overpay. I could see it be a 3 year NMC and then a 15 team NTC plus a market contract. With the way he focused on not being traded, I think security might be pretty important to him
17 mai à 10 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 40,014
Mentions "j'aime": 20,559
Quoting: Gofnut999
What he said.


Ottawa returns Boston’s 24 1st and prospect for Ullmark. Might work for both teams. Now convince Ullmark to waive. Good luck with that. Sens better open the vault with a ridiculous overpay extension to get him to consider .


Don't think Ottawa is interested in having both Ullmark and Korpisalo on the books post extension.

Also Ullmark can only block 15 teams after July 1st, would he even have Ottawa on that list? Considering LA was the 16 team list from this year probably covered most of not all of the West only
Borocop a aimé ceci.
17 mai à 10 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,066
Mentions "j'aime": 767
That is quite the gamble.
17 mai à 10 h 25
#6
YARRRR!!!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 100
I'd imagine this would be a no go. Sens are fairly committed to Pinto.

Ullmark wouldn't be a problem extending...hopefully.
17 mai à 10 h 33
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,264
Mentions "j'aime": 9,054
Quoting: Celtics21
Don’t even think it will require a ridiculous overpay. I could see it be a 3 year NMC and then a 15 team NTC plus a market contract. With the way he focused on not being traded, I think security might be pretty important to him


Agree to disagree
17 mai à 10 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,264
Mentions "j'aime": 9,054
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Don't think Ottawa is interested in having both Ullmark and Korpisalo on the books post extension.

Also Ullmark can only block 15 teams after July 1st, would he even have Ottawa on that list? Considering LA was the 16 team list from this year probably covered most of not all of the West only



He currently has 16 team list. The consensus is it is the entire Pacific Division, remainder of Canada, leaving 4 more teams. Safe guess would be Zona, Colorado, Columbus, Buffalo. Doubt you’d be wrong by more than 1.

He gets to submit a brand new list for next year. With only 1 year left he can remove some teams that are set in net and will not trade for him, i.e. Vegas, Winnipeg, Seattle etc. and replace them with other teams.

He will control his destination.

It will likely be his last big contract before the short term/less $ deals as his career winds down. It’s also the last time he will have this much control over where he plays.

It is not going to be Ottawa unless they give him a reason to or there not other options.

It’s just reality. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Borocop a aimé ceci.
17 mai à 10 h 56
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
Quoting: Gofnut999
He currently has 16 team list. The consensus is it is the entire Pacific Division, remainder of Canada, leaving 4 more teams. Safe guess would be Zona, Colorado, Columbus, Buffalo. Doubt you’d be wrong by more than 1.

He gets to submit a brand new list for next year. With only 1 year left he can remove some teams that are set in net and will not trade for him, i.e. Vegas, Winnipeg, Seattle etc. and replace them with other teams.

He will control his destination.

It will likely be his last big contract before the short term/less $ deals as his career winds down. It’s also the last time he will have this much control over where he plays.

It is not going to be Ottawa unless they give him a reason to or there not other options.

It’s just reality. 🤷🏻‍♂️


The interesting aspect is if he gets traded to Jersey, I doubt he gets an extension. Teams on his NTC can be positioned to provide an extension as a condition of the deal. If anything, I think he used his NTC as a mechanism to secure stability. I know you disagree, but I think his agent would be not OK with the strategy you are suggesting.
17 mai à 11 h 25
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,264
Mentions "j'aime": 9,054
Modifié 17 mai à 11 h 41
Quoting: Celtics21
The interesting aspect is if he gets traded to Jersey, I doubt he gets an extension. Teams on his NTC can be positioned to provide an extension as a condition of the deal. If anything, I think he used his NTC as a mechanism to secure stability. I know you disagree, but I think his agent would be not OK with the strategy you are suggesting.


I assume any team that trades for him likely try to extend him. 🤷🏻‍♂️

There are exceptions. Avs got Kuemper as rental, won their cup, let him walk to get younger/cheaper in net, which i imagine they are regretting. But that is another conversation.

It’s one year. You seem to forget that. He is likely far better off playing out his contract, wherever it is, walking as a FA then negotiating with multiple teams and choosing the situation that is best for him as opposed to having only one team to negotiate with, especially if it’s a team/city he’s not all that crazy about going to.

That is an option for him as well. He does not have to sign an extension where he is traded to unless he likes it there, or they give him a reason to.

This is the entire point of having that NTC, control, making sure you don’t end up in a bad situation or a city you don’t want to be with multiple years left.

If you think an extension with trade protection in a place you’d rather not be is more important than going where you want to go, where you can get trade protection as well, then I don’t know what to say. 🤷🏻‍♂️

BTW, don’t be surprised if NJ is on his next list. Have you been to Newark? He could be moved to them before that though.
17 mai à 15 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 5,602
Mentions "j'aime": 1,891
The primary difference is it is one year where the likelihood he will be separated from his kids or traded to a situation that might not be favorable to his stat line is possible (if not probable).

Elias Lindholm turned down 8 years, 8.5M AAV to get to another market. Let’s see how much that costs him. After this playoffs, maybe not so much.

After the two previous years, he’s at his apex for earning right now whether you choose to ignore that or not is irrelevant.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage