SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flip Ullmark Land Carlo

Créé par: DopeGM
Équipe: 2024-25 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 15 mai 2024
Publié: 15 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I was looking for a shutdown RHS Dman for this team. Well it’s Carlo or Cernak basically. I don’t see a UFA coming to BUF.

So I’m assuming (mostly for the fun of it!) that the Boston BBuster won’t result in Ullmark staying. I vaguely remember he dislikes ownership or something. But man, this team is a LOT better, and they should be giving up the 11th OA and Rosen, but wow.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
33 850 000 $
21 250 000 $
33 250 000 $
86 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. Rosén, Isak
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 500 000 $82 785 357 $0 $3 500 000 $4 714 643 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
886 667 $886 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
C
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mai à 8 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 491
Mentions "j'aime": 171
I don't think I'd even think about that package for just Carlo, forget Ullmark.

And why would Boston not trade Ullmark to Carolina themselves?
15 mai à 8 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,672
Mentions "j'aime": 3,064
Canes pass. 0 interest in Ullmark and his “stellar” playoff record
DopeGM et palhal a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 8 h 28
#3
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: BsInOttawa
I don't think I'd even think about that package for just Carlo, forget Ullmark.

And why would Boston not trade Ullmark to Carolina themselves?


Not enough in the deal for BUF to accept without him in there.

Rosen and 11OA isn’t enough for Carlo in your mind? Interesting
15 mai à 8 h 30
#4
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Kulich or Ohgren instead of Rosen results in a “no” from the BUF side I would think.
15 mai à 8 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,351
Mentions "j'aime": 14,850
Quoting: DopeGM
Kulich or Ohgren instead of Rosen results in a “no” from the BUF side I would think.


And how would we have acquired ohgren?
15 mai à 8 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
And how would we have acquired ohgren?


smile Ostlund apologies
15 mai à 8 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,661
Mentions "j'aime": 5,190
Quoting: BsInOttawa
I don't think I'd even think about that package for just Carlo, forget Ullmark.

And why would Boston not trade Ullmark to Carolina themselves?


Because Carolina has 0 interest in Ullmark
15 mai à 8 h 52
#8
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
And how would we have acquired ohgren?


Would you move the pick for a veteran but not too old RHS shutdown defenceman?
15 mai à 9 h 1
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,351
Mentions "j'aime": 14,850
Quoting: DopeGM
Would you move the pick for a veteran but not too old RHS shutdown defenceman?


We have invested quite heavily in our blue line.

I'd rather trade it for a middle 6 center
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 9 h 5
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,057
Mentions "j'aime": 8,963
Boston is not trading Carlo. Period.

If Canes want Ullmark B’s just trade him to them themselves. Doubt they do. Freddy, OK, and Martin all signed for next year. They’d have to make other moves to make room for him.
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 9 h 12
#11
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Gofnut999
Boston is not trading Carlo. Period.

If Canes want Ullmark B’s just trade him to them themselves. Doubt they do. Freddy, OK, and Martin all signed for next year. They’d have to make other moves to make room for him.


I was brainstorming a properly aged RHS dman and only Carlo and Cernak popped through. Both way more valuable to their teams than in trades.
Gofnut999 et sabres89 a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 9 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
We have invested quite heavily in our blue line.

I'd rather trade it for a middle 6 center


An elite winger or a shutdown third line centre. On the third line centre, that’s interesting. Worth noodling. Playoff style centres are really hard to land in trade. Seems more likely that Kulich becomes that piece to me. I like the thinking but can’t think of a target
15 mai à 9 h 16
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 20,057
Mentions "j'aime": 8,963
Quoting: DopeGM
I was brainstorming a properly aged RHS dman and only Carlo and Cernak popped through. Both way more valuable to their teams than in trades.


Rumors Cernak is done in TB, might try for him. 🤷🏻‍♂️
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 9 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 491
Mentions "j'aime": 171
Quoting: DopeGM
Not enough in the deal for BUF to accept without him in there.

Rosen and 11OA isn’t enough for Carlo in your mind? Interesting


Nope. A draft pick and an undersized winger who hasn't scored an NHL goal for the best penalty killing D around locked into a killer contract? I wouldn't make that move.

I can see that the "value" is there in that - but why would you ever move on from Carlo at $4.1M? It's less than 30% that a player picked at 11 will ever be as good as Carlo, and I don't think Rosen's ceiling is as valuable as Carlo is, let alone his current value as an undersized 20 goal AHL player.
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 9 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
I don’t believe Boston is trading Carlo. He fits the age grouping of their best players. My guess is they use FA to acquire help at forward

I’d like to believe Carolina isn’t trading Necas, but could see it if they want to keep Guentzel. Curious to see how replacing FA’s with young defenders impacts their identify
15 mai à 9 h 33
#16
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
I would say there’s a 75% chance that the pick at 11 is as impactful to the team as Carlo in a different role. Massive difference in pick value is our difference of opinion.

Carlo gets a really nice third contract most likely. So if I’m Bs management, the question is “is three years of Carlo compared to Clifton worth sacrificing in order to land 10+ years of a young, impactful player”

Catton / Iginla for forwards
Yakemchuk / Silayev on D

Those are really projectable, nice pieces to add.

Tough to move Carlo but the value is around correct in ACGM land smile
15 mai à 9 h 44
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Quoting: DopeGM
I would say there’s a 75% chance that the pick at 11 is as impactful to the team as Carlo in a different role. Massive difference in pick value is our difference of opinion.

Carlo gets a really nice third contract most likely. So if I’m Bs management, the question is “is three years of Carlo compared to Clifton worth sacrificing in order to land 10+ years of a young, impactful player”

Catton / Iginla for forwards
Yakemchuk / Silayev on D

Those are really projectable, nice pieces to add.

Tough to move Carlo but the value is around correct in ACGM land smile


I think there 11th pick is around the point in most drafts where you get into hit and miss territory. Your likelihood of selecting Wahlstrom is probably just as high as Villardi.

I don’t believe Boston is in a stage where decreasing their defensive effectiveness fits with their identify. I think the probability that the 11th pick is better than Carlo over the next 4 years is probably in the 25th percentile (since you chose a random one, I might as well).
15 mai à 9 h 50
#18
Démarrer sujet
Serious armchairGM:)
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Celtics21
I think there 11th pick is around the point in most drafts where you get into hit and miss territory. Your likelihood of selecting Wahlstrom is probably just as high as Villardi.

I don’t believe Boston is in a stage where decreasing their defensive effectiveness fits with their identify. I think the probability that the 11th pick is better than Carlo over the next 4 years is probably in the 25th percentile (since you chose a random one, I might as well).


I like random numbers smile

I disagree just simply based on reading and thinking about this draft. It’s possible it’s the usual homer pre draft hype that’s got me. But I’m usually pretty solid on what high floors look like.

If they took Senecke for example, that’s a much lower floor. Bust potential. But Iginla and Catton look very projectable. Silayev has bust potential and I’ve only seen highlights. But a floor of Tyler Myers is not all that shabby.

I’m trying to say that the pick is very projectable for the Bs if they were to move Carlo it would have to be for a premium asset. Better the pick than Rossi for example.
15 mai à 10 h 5
#19
Hurricane Tulsky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,863
Mentions "j'aime": 3,635
Canes are likely to trade Necas, but not for a goalie and a injury prone defender who is signed long term.
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 10 h 36
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 823
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Quoting: Celtics21
I think there 11th pick is around the point in most drafts where you get into hit and miss territory. Your likelihood of selecting Wahlstrom is probably just as high as Villardi.

I don’t believe Boston is in a stage where decreasing their defensive effectiveness fits with their identify. I think the probability that the 11th pick is better than Carlo over the next 4 years is probably in the 25th percentile (since you chose a random one, I might as well).


Value is certainly there. If the Bs were rebuilding/retooling, I'd probably accept if I were them, but they're not. They have a boatload of cap space going into next year with a lot of talent, both young and old, on their roster. Trading Carlo just creates a massive hole that they can't really fill elsewhere. Just not the move to make for a contending team
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
15 mai à 10 h 38
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Quoting: LPProductions
Value is certainly there. If the Bs were rebuilding/retooling, I'd probably accept if I were them, but they're not. They have a boatload of cap space going into next year with a lot of talent, both young and old, on their roster. Trading Carlo just creates a massive hole that they can't really fill elsewhere. Just not the move to make for a contending team


I think other teams might consider it. Its just the stage of the teams life cycle.
DopeGM a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage