SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seth to Utah

Créé par: boilermaker
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2024
Publié: 12 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The new Utah ownership likely wants to make some big moves this summer via trades and free agency. They are not the Arizona Coyotes any more and will take some steps to become a playoff contender. One of those moves is to acquire Seth Jones for their 1st round 2024 pick. Seth agrees to waive his NMC since he's tired of losing and figures Utah is further along their rebuild than Chicago. Chicago can retain 2M of Jones AAV.

Hawks select Levshunov with the 2nd overall and he becomes their projected #1 RD in a couple of years. With the Utah pick, 6th overall, The Hawks select a forward. Maybe Lindstom if still on the board, or Catton, or even Eiserman.

Meanwhile the Hawks sign a couple of defensemen in Roy and Chatfield to play the right side as placeholders until Levshunov and Rinzel are ready. Monahan and Sprong also signed to bolster the forward group.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
44 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
34 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Jones, Seth (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de ARI
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $68 376 667 $0 $6 675 000 $15 123 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai à 10 h 50
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,054
Mentions "j'aime": 10,483
Woah, no retention. Way to long to retain.
SociallyHawkward et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 11 h 1
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,581
Mentions "j'aime": 25,213
Not for this tho
12 mai à 11 h 2
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,581
Mentions "j'aime": 25,213
Quoting: exo2769
Woah, no retention. Way to long to retain.


By the time the 6th overall needs to be paid , it’ll be 4 years. Even then a bridge is possible and then Jones expires.
boilermaker a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 11 h 7
#4
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 161
Mentions "j'aime": 108
I'm not crazy about trading Seth. He's played better than people are giving him credit for. Is he overpaid? Yes but only by maybe $1MM. Not a problem cap wise for the Hawks. As far as the trade goes, I'm okay with it although given the depth of defensemen and lack of depth at forward in this draft, I might be tempted to take Demidov at #2 and then a defenseman like Silayev, Buium or Dickinson at #6. I'm thinking though that the more likely scenario is that Seth stays ad Utah signs Roy and Chatfield and then drafts a defenseman.
exo2769, SociallyHawkward, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 11 h 9
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,054
Mentions "j'aime": 10,483
Modifié 12 mai à 11 h 47
Quoting: csick
By the time the 6th overall needs to be paid , it’ll be 4 years. Even then a bridge is possible and then Jones expires.


I just want to keep Jones. I think he's one of the most underrated players in the NHL considering all the Leafs fans saying hes worth $5M...crazy! Yes our team isn't good right now. He's still 25atoi playing against the opponents top pair and was with essentially a rookie the entire year last year. Yes Vlasic is good, but rookies are still rookies.
12 mai à 11 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,888
Mentions "j'aime": 6,422
Quoting: CoachQ
I'm not crazy about trading Seth. He's played better than people are giving him credit for. Is he overpaid? Yes but only by maybe $1MM. Not a problem cap wise for the Hawks. As far as the trade goes, I'm okay with it although given the depth of defensemen and lack of depth at forward in this draft, I might be tempted to take Demidov at #2 and then a defenseman like Silayev, Buium or Dickinson at #6. I'm thinking though that the more likely scenario is that Seth stays ad Utah signs Roy and Chatfield and then drafts a defenseman.


My thoughts exactly.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 11 h 46
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 231
Mentions "j'aime": 244
I agree Seth is a capable player, though overpaid by a couple of million. And playing 25 minutes is important as the younger defenders learn their way. I'm just looking forward 2 or 3 years and would want Levshunov and a good forward prospect on the cusp of making the team at that time instead of a possibly declining Jones. I have a feeling Seth's contract isn't going to age very well. He probably has 3-4 years left of good play, then the wear and tear of playing all those minutes will come into play. He'll be a boat anchor for the last 2 years, so trade him now while he has value (ripe opportunity if you ask me with Utah) and obtain a future asset that will be coming into his own when the team becomes competitive.
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 11 h 47
#8
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,946
Mentions "j'aime": 12,546
What an awful trade for Utah.
12 mai à 11 h 50
#9
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,054
Mentions "j'aime": 10,483
Quoting: boilermaker
I agree Seth is a capable player, though overpaid by a couple of million. And playing 25 minutes is important as the younger defenders learn their way. I'm just looking forward 2 or 3 years and would want Levshunov and a good forward prospect on the cusp of making the team at that time instead of a possibly declining Jones. I have a feeling Seth's contract isn't going to age very well. He probably has 3-4 years left of good play, then the wear and tear of playing all those minutes will come into play. He'll be a boat anchor for the last 2 years, so trade him now while he has value (ripe opportunity if you ask me with Utah) and obtain a future asset that will be coming into his own when the team becomes competitive.


But even if it is 3-4 years. He's still going to be capable of 2nd pair responsibilities and we're still going to have plenty of cap space with all the prospects coming up. I much rather have proper prospect development with veterans on the team than trade away all the veterans.
12 mai à 12 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 455
Mentions "j'aime": 595
Quoting: boilermaker
I agree Seth is a capable player, though overpaid by a couple of million. And playing 25 minutes is important as the younger defenders learn their way. I'm just looking forward 2 or 3 years and would want Levshunov and a good forward prospect on the cusp of making the team at that time instead of a possibly declining Jones. I have a feeling Seth's contract isn't going to age very well. He probably has 3-4 years left of good play, then the wear and tear of playing all those minutes will come into play. He'll be a boat anchor for the last 2 years, so trade him now while he has value (ripe opportunity if you ask me with Utah) and obtain a future asset that will be coming into his own when the team becomes competitive.


I really like this idea. Yes, Seth is a solid #1 for the Hawks these days; playing an important role for ~25 minutes a game that no one else on the Hawks can. I'd look to overpay DeMelo for four years, as an interim fix while Levshunov, Rinzel, and others ripen. He's not Seth Jones, but he'd do, IMO.

Grabbing the #6 OA would be a huge win, in addition to our #2 OA... Those two picks could greatly impact the Hawks' future, while enabling Utah to announce to the hockey world - and their fans - that their franchise is new and aggressive. That, plus Utah is further along in their rebuild, so Seth may waive to go there.

Excellent job, Boiler. I hope the Hawks find a way to make it happen. Cheers
12 mai à 12 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 9,176
Mentions "j'aime": 3,554
Quoting: CoachQ
I'm not crazy about trading Seth. He's played better than people are giving him credit for. Is he overpaid? Yes but only by maybe $1MM. Not a problem cap wise for the Hawks. As far as the trade goes, I'm okay with it although given the depth of defensemen and lack of depth at forward in this draft, I might be tempted to take Demidov at #2 and then a defenseman like Silayev, Buium or Dickinson at #6. I'm thinking though that the more likely scenario is that Seth stays ad Utah signs Roy and Chatfield and then drafts a defenseman.


If I was CHI I would take Levshunov and Silayev if possible. They get their future RD, and a rare specimen in Silayev. They'll likely be very bad for another year, at the very least, and will be able to pick up a comparable forward to Demidov or (any other forward prospect that they may want). They should have no problem attracting top-talent via free agency in the future if a 1st line winger becomes available. Eiserman would be a good pick if they didn't already have Bedard who is an amazing goal scorer and Nazar who might be a goal scorer as well.

If Anaheim, CLB, or MTL take Silayev, I don't think they should trade Jones for the 6OV unless they can turn that into a young somewhat established forward like Zegras or someone like Marner, but I would assume they could trade Jones+ for Marner straight.
12 mai à 12 h 35
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 231
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: exo2769
But even if it is 3-4 years. He's still going to be capable of 2nd pair responsibilities and we're still going to have plenty of cap space with all the prospects coming up. I much rather have proper prospect development with veterans on the team than trade away all the veterans.


Levshunov and Rinzel could be holding down the top 2 RD pairings by that time. I'll worry about the 3rd pair RD down the road. Also in my scenario, they are signing 4 veterans, 2F and 2D, for the next 3 years to help bring the prospects along.
12 mai à 12 h 39
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 231
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
What an awful trade for Utah.


Depends on what Utah thinks. And they can use a few defensemen on their roster for next year and going forward. They could also market Jones to the new fan base. I think Jones is reasonably paid for what he is at 7.5M. Hence my idea of the 2M retention.
12 mai à 12 h 40
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 231
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: GMBL
If I was CHI I would take Levshunov and Silayev if possible. They get their future RD, and a rare specimen in Silayev. They'll likely be very bad for another year, at the very least, and will be able to pick up a comparable forward to Demidov or (any other forward prospect that they may want). They should have no problem attracting top-talent via free agency in the future if a 1st line winger becomes available. Eiserman would be a good pick if they didn't already have Bedard who is an amazing goal scorer and Nazar who might be a goal scorer as well.

If Anaheim, CLB, or MTL take Silayev, I don't think they should trade Jones for the 6OV unless they can turn that into a young somewhat established forward like Zegras or someone like Marner, but I would assume they could trade Jones+ for Marner straight.


I don't think Jones will waive for Toronto and vice versa as far as Marner is concerned.
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 12 h 52
#15
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,946
Mentions "j'aime": 12,546
Quoting: boilermaker
Depends on what Utah thinks. And they can use a few defensemen on their roster for next year and going forward. They could also market Jones to the new fan base. I think Jones is reasonably paid for what he is at 7.5M. Hence my idea of the 2M retention.


I would just way rather a 6th overall pick and even with the retention don't think Jones is worth that early of a pick, if Chicago had a middish 1st they were sending with Jones then maybe it's worth considering but imo this here isn't worth it for Utah.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage