SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Helenius to Anaheim

Créé par: NHLInsider67
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2024
Publié: 6 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the rumours about Anaheim wanting Helenius are true, Montreal HAS to do whatever they can to trade for Anaheim’s pick (assuming that Anaheim picks ahead of the Canadiens)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Zegras, Trevor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Guhle, Kaiden
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Probably need to add a bit more, not sure what though
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
I’m completely unsure of Matheson’s value, but he has to go because we have too many defensemen and we need Hutson on PP1.
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Deadline deal at half salary. Doesn’t have to be Toronto, but they need defence.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de TOR
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2187 700 000 $70 462 083 $1 170 000 $3 640 000 $17 237 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Demidov, Ivan
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai à 17 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 16,447
Mentions "j'aime": 12,706
Where did these rumors come from? Let’s not forget Verbeek doesn’t let leaks like these out either
jfkst1 et GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 17 h 17
#2
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,471
Mentions "j'aime": 4,862
So Anaheim pays you to move down in the draft? Give your head a shake.
6 mai à 17 h 17
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,581
Mentions "j'aime": 25,213
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Where did these rumors come from? Let’s not forget Verbeek doesn’t let leaks like these out either


Verbeek taking Helenius would be very 2021 McTavish like
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 17 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,723
Mentions "j'aime": 811
I know it says could be anywhere. But how the heck does Toronto need defence lmao
6 mai à 17 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 6
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: squashmaple
So Anaheim pays you to move down in the draft? Give your head a shake.


Look at it as 2 separate trades

1. Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick

2. Barron + 2nd for Zegras (Zegras isn’t worth much more than that imo, he’s severely overrated)
6 mai à 17 h 49
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,572
Mentions "j'aime": 7,387
Modifié 6 mai à 17 h 57
Quoting: NHLInsider67
Look at it as 2 separate trades

1. Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick

2. Barron + 2nd for Zegras (Zegras isn’t worth much more than that imo, he’s severely overrated)


We have Guhle at home his name is Mintyukov, and if you want Zegras it'll take your 6OA pick +, since your opinion is frankly junk.

Lastly, why would we be chasing Helenius? Name your source.
squashmaple et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 18 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,885
Mentions "j'aime": 6,623
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
We have Guhle at home his name is Mintyukov, and if you want Zegras it'll take your 6OA pick +, since your opinion is frankly junk.

Lastly, why would we be chasing Helenius? Name your source.


Sourse was an article that did a mock draft by Montreal hockey now, they only suggested that the Ducks could go off the board and select Helenius at 4 since he fits what Verbeek described he was looking for this off season (top 6 RS forward or top 4 RHD) the article was just a mock and wasn't based on any specific rumors. They mocked Celebrini, Demidov and Levshunov going top 3 then suggested the Helenius pick

https://montrealhockeynow.com/2024/05/06/mhn-pre-lottery-2024-nhl-mock-draft/
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 18 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,885
Mentions "j'aime": 6,623
Quoting: NHLInsider67
Look at it as 2 separate trades

1. Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick

2. Barron + 2nd for Zegras (Zegras isn’t worth much more than that imo, he’s severely overrated)


Its actually not, the value of trading up 1 spot in the draft is a 2nd round pick, Guhle has way more value than that. You proposal actually breaks down like this Ana 1st for Mon 1st + 2nd - Guhle + Barron for Zegras. Now the value for Zegras is fine but the parts are not, as was stated by a Ducks fan previously they don't need Guhle, so if you take him out of the deal you are gonna have to replace him with another 1st (lottery protected 2025) or someone we dont want to move (Reinbacher, Slafkovsky, Mailloux, ect...) which kills any deal. The problem with a Ducks/Habs trade is we are in similar situations with regards to our rebuilds and our rosters are missing similar peices (top 6 forward or top pairing RD) so trades are gonna be extremely difficult.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 20 h 17
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,404
Mentions "j'aime": 26,156
Quoting: NHLInsider67
Look at it as 2 separate trades

1. Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick

2. Barron + 2nd for Zegras (Zegras isn’t worth much more than that imo, he’s severely overrated)

1. Although a very fine player, and a prospect who may mature into a #1LD, Guhle is of little interest to Anaheim because the Ducks already have Pavel Mintyukov playing #1LD. So the trade fails on that ground.

2. Player A: 211 games, 55 goals + 99 assists = 154 points, -40; Player B: 205 games, 81 goals + 68 assists = 149 points, -39

Saying those two entirely comparable players are only worth Barron and a future top-40 second is the worst misjudgment you will make until the draft.
squashmaple a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 20 h 53
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: Campabee
Sourse was an article that did a mock draft by Montreal hockey now, they only suggested that the Ducks could go off the board and select Helenius at 4 since he fits what Verbeek described he was looking for this off season (top 6 RS forward or top 4 RHD) the article was just a mock and wasn't based on any specific rumors. They mocked Celebrini, Demidov and Levshunov going top 3 then suggested the Helenius pick

https://montrealhockeynow.com/2024/05/06/mhn-pre-lottery-2024-nhl-mock-draft/


I read this article. The article starts by saying PV wants a top 6RHW winger and a top 4RHD, which is correct. Somehow the writer comes to a conclusion suggesting Konsta Heleinus is their man because of his gritty style of play and ANA need at RW. Then vaguely says "Multiple sources have spoken to Anaheim’s strong appreciation for Helenius". In no way does this comment suggest ANA is going to pick him. It purely states they like his style of play. I can guarantee you that if PV was asked about any other prospect he would comment saying something similar. I'd love to know who these "Multiple sources" are, they are not listed in the article. The majority of people who are familiar with the Ducks organisation know PV keeps a tight ship, hence no one knew about the Drysdale-Guthier trade and the selection of Leo Carlson over Adam Fantili.

It's made by the Montreal media, therefore it must be accurate, definitely not clickbait promoting the "Cayden Lindstrom going to MTL agenda". In the comments of that article you have someone else bagging the article. Do your research and crosscheck what you write.

Quoting: NHLInsider67
Look at it as 2 separate trades

1. Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick

2. Barron + 2nd for Zegras (Zegras isn’t worth much more than that imo, he’s severely overrated)


The Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick to move up 1-2 spots. Value wise tipped towards MTL, but as pointed out isn't worth it for ANA. He would become a scratched/ third-string guy on our future team.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Are you suggesting Zegras is worth a MID second and a 3rd pair shutdown defenceman?
Because if you do believe this, you have some problems up top. Have you not learned from everyone suggesting Hughes is a bust, and even Slafkovsky until finally somewhat breaking out this year? What's worse Zegras has been injured all year. When he finally returned he became a PPG player. This accusation of Zegras being horrible defensively has been based on previous years. This year (although the sample size has been small) Zegras has improved his defence drastically. At this stage, you are just picking and choosing the worst attributes of Zegras's game over the past years just so you can offer this horrendous deal.

EDIT: Sorry if I was a bit harsh, I had a bad morning. I didn't mean to sound like an A-hole
6 mai à 20 h 56
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,885
Mentions "j'aime": 6,623
Quoting: ItsDuckSeason
I read this article. The article starts by saying PV wants a top 6RHW winger and a top 4RHD, which is correct. Somehow the writer comes to a conclusion suggesting Konsta Heleinus is their man because of his gritty style of play and ANA need at RW. Then vaguely says "Multiple sources have spoken to Anaheim’s strong appreciation for Helenius". In no way does this comment suggest ANA is going to pick him. It purely states they like his style of play. I can guarantee you that if PV was asked about any other prospect he would comment saying something similar. I'd love to know who these "Multiple sources" are, they are not listed in the article. The majority of people who are familiar with the Ducks organisation know PV keeps a tight ship, hence no one knew about the Drysdale-Guthier trade and the selection of Leo Carlson over Adam Fantili.

It's made by the Montreal media, therefore it must be accurate, definitely not clickbait promoting the "Cayden Lindstrom going to MTL agenda". In the comments of that article you have someone else bagging the article. Do your research and crosscheck what you write.



The Guhle + MTL pick for ANA pick to move up 1-2 spots. Value wise tipped towards MTL, but as pointed out isn't worth it for ANA. He would become a scratched/ third-string guy on our future team.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Are you suggesting Zegras is worth a MID second and a 3rd pair shutdown defenceman?
Because if you do believe this, you have some problems up top. Have you not learned from everyone suggesting Hughes is a bust, and even Slafkovsky until finally somewhat breaking out this year? What's worse Zegras has been injured all year. When he finally returned he became a PPG player. This accusation of Zegras being horrible defensively has been based on previous years. This year (although the sample size has been small) Zegras has improved his defence drastically. At this stage, you are just picking and choosing the worst attributes of Zegras's game over the past years just so you can offer this horrendous deal.

EDIT: Sorry if I was a bit harsh, I had a bad morning. I didn't mean to sound like an A-hole


I think you are confusing me for someone else, I only answered where the OP got his supposed sources from, I even said that it was speculation and not fact. I was defending the Ducks fans POV not supporting the OP's.
ItsDuckSeason a aimé ceci.
6 mai à 21 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: Campabee
I think you are confusing me for someone else, I only answered where the OP got his supposed sources from, I even said that it was speculation and not fact. I was defending the Ducks fans POV not supporting the OP's.


Sorry, I shouldn't have directed it towards you. I meant the OP.
Campabee a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage