SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thoughts

Créé par: sharcuda22
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2024
Publié: 2 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
IMO idk how much of a fan i am of the Pionk deal. But i dont think we get the first otherwise, and I cant see how guschin and bords play in the same team at the NHL level with 6 other first or second year NHLers
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
21 025 000 $
21 025 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
28 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3950 000 $
Goodrow, Barclay
2775 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Fabbri, Robby
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (DET)
DET
2.
SJS
  1. Pionk, Neal
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. Bordeleau, Thomas [Droits de RFA]
  3. Granlund, Mikael
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de DET
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $68 110 000 $0 $1 307 500 $19 590 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Celebrini, Macklin
950 000 $950 000 $
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Goodrow, Barclay
775 000 $775 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mai à 18 h 17
#1
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 4,667
Pionk may have been the worst player in the AVS/Jets playoff series. 😬
areax91 et RationalHockeyFan a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 18 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,168
Mentions "j'aime": 7,199
No chance Winnipeg pays a 1st to take back more bad salary than they're sending out.
2 mai à 18 h 22
#3
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Windjammer
No chance Winnipeg pays a 1st to take back more bad salary than they're sending out.


Who is the bad salary going to Winnipeg
2 mai à 18 h 22
#4
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: SharkTank
Pionk may have been the worst player in the AVS/Jets playoff series. 😬


He can pretend to be 1D for one more year i know itttt, but its more about our D core having some more clearly defined roles
2 mai à 18 h 23
#5
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,917
Mentions "j'aime": 4,667
Quoting: sharcuda22
He can pretend to be 1D for one more year i know itttt, but its more about our D core having some more clearly defined roles


Well Avs make a lot of D look bad. 😁
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 18 h 34
#6
Phase 3 Profit
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 128
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Even the Shark homer in me doesn't see Peg giving up a 1st in that deal.
2 mai à 18 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,168
Mentions "j'aime": 7,199
Quoting: sharcuda22
Who is the bad salary going to Winnipeg


Granlund and Benning.
2 mai à 18 h 51
#8
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
There's better RHD UFAs than Pionk. Granlund should get a 1st alone. Benning is a fantastic middle pairing guy. Bords is starting to actually find his game. Fabbri taking Eklunds spot in the top 6 is infuriating. Couture may never play again. Overall, throwing every top prospect into the NHL at the same time is a perfect way to destroy their development, so if they get Macklin then let either him or Smith go back another year

Only thing I like is Marchessault, but I'd prefer they target Stephenson and then another Center/RW like Duchene, Domi, Duclair, etc.
2 mai à 18 h 52
#9
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Windjammer
Granlund and Benning.


Neither of those guys are on bad contracts lol. Granlund is a true 2C and Benning is on an insanely cheap deal as a solid 2nd/3rd pairing D
2 mai à 18 h 53
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,284
Mentions "j'aime": 3,703
Quoting: Windjammer
Granlund and Benning.


Can you be more of a damn homer? Benning is cheap as hell and Granlund put up 60 in 69 games. How exactly is that bad money?
2 mai à 18 h 55
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,168
Mentions "j'aime": 7,199
Quoting: AStovetop
Neither of those guys are on bad contracts lol. Granlund is a true 2C and Benning is on an insanely cheap deal as a solid 2nd/3rd pairing D


Yeah, they both are. Granlund was brought in as a cap dump. A fluke year doesn't change what he is. Why did you think no one was interested at the tdl?

Benning is paid too much for a 6/7D.
2 mai à 19 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 848
Mentions "j'aime": 425
When you demand a third to take on Fabbri, and then put him on your first line. 😂
Caboose119z a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 19 h 15
#13
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Windjammer
Yeah, they both are. Granlund was brought in as a cap dump. A fluke year doesn't change what he is. Why did you think no one was interested at the tdl?

Benning is paid too much for a 6/7D.


He had a fluke year while being on one of the worst offensive teams in the salary cap era? lol He's hit the 60+ point mark 4 times in his career. Maybe watch him play before saying something so ignorant

Same goes for Benning, calling a middle paring RHD making 1.25 mil a year "paid too much" is some wild mental gymnastics
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 19 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,761
Mentions "j'aime": 8,329
Winnipeg doesn't need more forwards. They have enough as it is. Pionk isn't a cap dump. He was outmatched against Colorado but he's still an effective second pairing defenseman. This trade doesn't make sense for Winnipeg.
I would be surprised if Fabbri cost that much to dump. Could probably retain and get positive value for him.
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 20 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Windjammer
Granlund and Benning.


Granlund played well worth his money this year. Benning is worth his salary…………… or at least he was but he got injured so its iffy.
2 mai à 20 h 11
#16
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Windjammer
Yeah, they both are. Granlund was brought in as a cap dump. A fluke year doesn't change what he is. Why did you think no one was interested at the tdl?

Benning is paid too much for a 6/7D.


Quoting: Lancebmx
Winnipeg doesn't need more forwards. They have enough as it is. Pionk isn't a cap dump. He was outmatched against Colorado but he's still an effective second pairing defenseman. This trade doesn't make sense for Winnipeg.
I would be surprised if Fabbri cost that much to dump. Could probably retain and get positive value for him.


The fluke year for granny was in Pittsburgh. There was plenty of reported interest but the sharks chose to take the hertl contract off their books with their last retention slot. Figuring out 1.5 years with third party retention is tricky at the deadline. I would imagine he gets moved this year unless he displays real leadership for the kids and we keep him around. Idk if fabbri is the type of player the sharks want i just see the trade a lot on here.

Lance thank you for filling me in. I spaced on the Monahan deal so if youre set for forwards then for sure this doesnt make sense.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 20 h 13
#17
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,819
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: DanielSan92
When you demand a third to take on Fabbri, and then put him on your first line. 😂


Brother I didn’t demand anything. The lines are split more evenly based on experience. I didn’t want to put guschin with smith or celebrini, and the sharks are really really really really bad. If Detroit doesnt need the cap space then the sharks can just find a different trade of this ilk or try to get duclair back.

It always had more to do with how god awful we are than how ‘good’ fabbri is
2 mai à 20 h 24
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,168
Mentions "j'aime": 7,199
Quoting: sharcuda22
Granlund played well worth his money this year. Benning is worth his salary…………… or at least he was but he got injured so its iffy.


Yeah, if the Jets are looking for a forward I don't think one year of a 32YO. And 2 years of a 30YO bottom pairing D will be very high on the list.
2 mai à 20 h 27
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,855
Mentions "j'aime": 12,131
Detroit isn't paying a 3rd to move Fabbri. He put up 18g and 32 points in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.
DanielSan92 et sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage