SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Habs win Macklin

Créé par: ht42
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 21 avr. 2024
Publié: 21 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
And for thoses who ask why I makes somes Anderson and Dvorack trades ?

Montreal will gonna need somes flexibility for resign somes RFA's like Slafkovsky (7,5-7,8M), Guhle (5-5,5M) and maybe Primeau for the 24-25 offseason.

Montreal will gonna need to open somes space in their 50 players roster for making somes places for younger players for the Laval Rockets.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
31 225 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 225 000 $
35 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Maklin
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Trade comparable : Zach Kassian to Arizona in 2022
SJS
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. Barron, Justin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  5. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
I can see Montreal being more agressive to clear somes cap space if they Draft a player like Celebrini.
2.
MTL
    Future considerations
    CHI
    1. Dvorak, Christian
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
    3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
    3.
    MTL
    1. Peeke, Andrew
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (BOS)
    BOS
    1. Kovacevic, Johnathan
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DET)
    3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (MTL)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de WSH
    2025
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de NJD
    2026
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 700 000 $74 396 250 $1 022 500 $4 670 000 $13 303 750 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    7 225 000 $7 225 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 7
    Celebrini, Maklin
    950 000 $950 000 $
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    835 000 $835 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    890 000 $890 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    812 500 $812 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
    Celebrini, M.
    Avantage numérique 2
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Infériorité numérique 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    21 avr. à 14 h 28
    #1
    Josh Anderson Sucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 4,849
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,025
    Interesting idea and i think the value is fine, just unsure if SJS is willing to do this. Its not like they could retain on Anderson and flip so they may be detered. Not all that bad value though IMO, Barron is a stud
    ht42 a aimé ceci.
    21 avr. à 14 h 33
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    ht42
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 2,471
    Mentions "j'aime": 704
    Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
    Interesting idea and i think the value is fine, just unsure if SJS is willing to do this. Its not like they could retain on Anderson and flip so they may be detered. Not all that bad value though IMO, Barron is a stud


    I mean, SJ will gonna need somes young Dmans in their core and they will likely gonna want to add another draft pick in the 2024 Draft.
    Kyle_Okposo_Lover a aimé ceci.
    21 avr. à 14 h 40
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 3,840
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
    i get the ideas of some trades, but dvorak will be UFA next year, would be dumb to pay to trade him when we have cap space.
    21 avr. à 14 h 43
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    ht42
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 2,471
    Mentions "j'aime": 704
    Quoting: drambui
    i get the ideas of some trades, but dvorak will be UFA next year, would be dumb to pay to trade him when we have cap space.


    Open somes spaces for the 50 players rosters and sign somes young players like Engstrom or somes veterans for Laval.

    Also, we have like too much centermans, and I'm rather having Monahan back than keeping Dvo.
    21 avr. à 14 h 49
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 3,838
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,187
    Peeke has been playing extremely well in Boston and making the concerns about giving up a future third a thing of the past. I’d rather have him than Jordan Harris in terms of fit.
    21 avr. à 14 h 50
    #6
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,485
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Dvorak’s contract ends up at the end of the season. If you want to open up spots for youngstrers, send him down and keep the picks
    drambui a aimé ceci.
    21 avr. à 14 h 51
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 3,840
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
    Quoting: ht42
    Open somes spaces for the 50 players rosters and sign somes young players like Engstrom or somes veterans for Laval.

    Also, we have like too much centermans, and I'm rather having Monahan back than keeping Dvo.


    i get it, but keep the second round pick and healthy scratch dvorak or waive him to the ahl.
    21 avr. à 14 h 54
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,855
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,866
    Boston declines that pretty quickly
    21 avr. à 15 h 13
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,556
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
    There isn't a contract on the roster that is hurting the organization or keeping them from resigning players or blocking the signing of other players. There are overpaid contracts but they are an annoyance not a hindrance.

    BTW, there are ways around the 50 contract limit, just sign the prospects you want to their ELC then sign the vets you want in Laval to an AHL contract, it prevents the vets from being called up but also doesn't count towards the 50 contract limit.

    I think its kind of funny trading guys like Kovacevic and Dvorak as if they are cap dumps but both contracts end after next season and Kovacevic's contract is less than the Peeke buyout cost, which would also have an additional year added on to it.

    Monahan does not make sense, he would just be blocking younger guys from developing at the NHL level and the Armia-Newhook-Gallagher line was great near the end of the season, I would like to see them start next season together.

    Why are you breaking up Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky? Do you not realize they were the highest scoring line in the league from the TDL to the end of the season, it seems like a really big mistake to not go into next season with that line intact.
    BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
    21 avr. à 15 h 37
    #10
    Snowhawk
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 2,420
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,455
    Hawks probably accept.
    Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
    21 avr. à 15 h 44
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    ht42
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 2,471
    Mentions "j'aime": 704
    Quoting: Campabee
    There isn't a contract on the roster that is hurting the organization or keeping them from resigning players or blocking the signing of other players. There are overpaid contracts but they are an annoyance not a hindrance.

    BTW, there are ways around the 50 contract limit, just sign the prospects you want to their ELC then sign the vets you want in Laval to an AHL contract, it prevents the vets from being called up but also doesn't count towards the 50 contract limit.

    I think its kind of funny trading guys like Kovacevic and Dvorak as if they are cap dumps but both contracts end after next season and Kovacevic's contract is less than the Peeke buyout cost, which would also have an additional year added on to it.

    Monahan does not make sense, he would just be blocking younger guys from developing at the NHL level and the Armia-Newhook-Gallagher line was great near the end of the season, I would like to see them start next season together.

    Why are you breaking up Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky? Do you not realize they were the highest scoring line in the league from the TDL to the end of the season, it seems like a really big mistake to not go into next season with that line intact.


    Kovacevic isn't really a cap dump, but I can see Boston wanted a pick because of their mistake for giving a 3rd for Peeke. Montreal will also likely want to have somes flexibility about the number of players before issues (ex : injuries). And that's also a horrible idea to send down Dvorack (and you can't execpt that's become of what happened with Armia last season).

    If you think Monahan blocks our young players, just don't forget that Beck was our only C prospect in our core, and he will likely gonna take the place of Evans when his contract will gonna expire. Also, it's a bad idea to have a full C line with 4 young players, you need somes veterans like Monahan to put out somes pressures on them. And the Newhook-Monahan-Roy is also a great fit.

    The Caufield line switch is just an idea, but I can expect that the 1st line will not gonna change.
    21 avr. à 21 h 0
    #12
    Boris Bagel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 2,866
    Mentions "j'aime": 614
    Dvorak only has next season left … not an issue or any need to deal him and waste picks
    21 avr. à 21 h 48
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,556
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
    Quoting: ht42
    Kovacevic isn't really a cap dump, but I can see Boston wanted a pick because of their mistake for giving a 3rd for Peeke. Montreal will also likely want to have somes flexibility about the number of players before issues (ex : injuries). And that's also a horrible idea to send down Dvorack (and you can't execpt that's become of what happened with Armia last season).

    If you think Monahan blocks our young players, just don't forget that Beck was our only C prospect in our core, and he will likely gonna take the place of Evans when his contract will gonna expire. Also, it's a bad idea to have a full C line with 4 young players, you need somes veterans like Monahan to put out somes pressures on them. And the Newhook-Monahan-Roy is also a great fit.

    The Caufield line switch is just an idea, but I can expect that the 1st line will not gonna change.


    I never said Kovacevic was a cap dump, I said moving his lower cap hit for a player you are buying out at a higher hit isn't a great idea. Also if the plan is to buyout Peeke, then Boston is the one that needs to add the pick since we are basically giving Kovacevic away for free.

    I think you are confused, I never said anything about sending Dvorak down to Laval, I said let his contract run out or trade him with retention, he isn't a cap dump at full cap anyway.

    You do realize that we have other young centers other than Beck right? Suzuki, Dach, Newhook, Evans and Celebrini (since you have the Habs winning the lottery) we don't need to sign Monahan at 5 mil to play 3C when we already have 5 others on the roster and Beck waiting in the wings. It makes much more sense to keep Armia-NewhookGallagher together as the 3rd line and run a top 6 of Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky, Roy-Celebrini-Dach and have Evans run some sort of Energy line
    22 avr. à 10 h 46
    #14
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 21,231
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
    boston just acquired peeke, why are they trading him?

    why on earth does stamkos take that deal?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage