SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

maybe a different approach

Créé par: Bruins_Guy613
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2024
Publié: 19 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
66 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
45 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
26 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Allen, Jake
  2. Siegenthaler, Jonas
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. Ullmark, Linus
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de FLA
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $86 278 334 $50 000 $330 000 $1 421 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. à 14 h 2
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,460
Mentions "j'aime": 2,282
Far too much from NJ. Siegs is a top 4 D, mix in our 1B goalie (who actually was fine to finish the year), and then a load of picks.
palhal a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 14 h 7
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,021
Mentions "j'aime": 1,082
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Far too much from NJ. Siegs is a top 4 D, mix in our 1B goalie (who actually was fine to finish the year), and then a load of picks.


You can keep Allen bruins don’t want him.
NJ is gonna have to overpay for a true starter, their current 3 goalie situation isn’t gonna get them anywhere. Allen isnt gonna be your answer not with how questionable your team defence is and how injury prone NJ is.
19 avr. à 14 h 9
#3
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,021
Mentions "j'aime": 1,082
Last thing bruins need is another shutdown dman I like siegenthaler but if we acquire him I’d look to move Carlo for either a Center or a more offensively gifted RHD.

I’d also put siegenthaler with mcavoy and lindholm with Carlo just so we can spread out the offensive talent. This season mcavoy has been our only dman consistently producing offence. So either lindholm or lohrei need to step up big time this coming season
19 avr. à 14 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,513
Mentions "j'aime": 18,465
Take out Siegenthaler, Lauko, 5th
19 avr. à 14 h 24
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,818
Mentions "j'aime": 22,839
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Far too much from NJ. Siegs is a top 4 D, mix in our 1B goalie (who actually was fine to finish the year), and then a load of picks.


Bruins fans seem to want way too much for Ullmark. His M NTC also limits any trade destination.
Does any rational hockey fan think that Ullmark is going to put up the same numbers with Jersey (or virtually any team) than what he has done with the Bruins.
19 avr. à 17 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 6,877
Mentions "j'aime": 1,993
A 2025 1st has been mutually been the main piece from NJ. A very small add and done. Ullmark will do better than what we had (not including Allen AND Kakkohen). And they will need to tweak a big piece on D so closer to Bruins but I get your point
19 avr. à 19 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 1,189
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Take out Siegenthaler, Lauko, 5th


Take out Ullmark and the rest of the package to for that price. I’d rather keep him than trade he for a collection of 2nd and a 3rd

It’s a 2025 first and something else. If a team offers a better prospect or 2024 first, NJ will need to go elsewhere for a goalie.
19 avr. à 19 h 21
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 1,189
Quoting: palhal
Bruins fans seem to want way too much for Ullmark. His M NTC also limits any trade destination.
Does any rational hockey fan think that Ullmark is going to put up the same numbers with Jersey (or virtually any team) than what he has done with the Bruins.


You seem to believe the Bruins aren’t the team in the playoffs who hasn’t allowed the highest high danger chances of any playoff team. Those goalies are a major part of them winning and that defensive structure leans on then a heck of a lot more than the ignorant belief that Boston’s defense inflates their performance. LA has been that team. Not Boston
19 avr. à 20 h 13
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,818
Mentions "j'aime": 22,839
Quoting: Celtics21
You seem to believe the Bruins aren’t the team in the playoffs who hasn’t allowed the highest high danger chances of any playoff team. Those goalies are a major part of them winning and that defensive structure leans on then a heck of a lot more than the ignorant belief that Boston’s defense inflates their performance. LA has been that team. Not Boston


Didn't say the Bruins were # 1, but compared the Devils, who have big problems on the defence this season , what would Ullmark's performance been like on a team like the Devils.
19 avr. à 20 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,844
Mentions "j'aime": 1,189
Quoting: palhal
Didn't say the Bruins were # 1, but compared the Devils, who have big problems on the defence this season , what would Ullmark's performance been like on a team like the Devils.


My assumption is his GsaX/60 would be similar. The Bruins systematically allow more high danger chances because Montgomery likes defenseman who join the rush.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage