SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This has to be it

Créé par: DQavis
Équipe: 2024-25 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 15 avr. 2024
Publié: 15 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 192
Journées restantes: 192
Saison restante: 100%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 73 266 667 $
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
31 100 000 $
61 400 000 $
31 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Murphy, Connor (2 200 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Kulak, Brett
  2. Lavoie, Raphael [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
ARI
  1. Broberg, Philip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Holloway, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Anderson, Josh (2 750 000 $ retained)
  2. Evans, Jake
MTL
  1. McLeod, Ryan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
(Become first if anderson scores 20 goals in the next 2 years)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 000 000 $90 166 666 $3 450 000 $0 $-3 166 666 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 599 999 $1 599 999 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 avr. à 12 h 14
#1
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,436
Habs say no, just because they can't retain that long on Anderson.

They likely only retain going into his last year of the deal and see what they get the.
jpsnow13 et Matt1567 a aimé ceci.
15 avr. à 12 h 43
#2
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,988
Mentions "j'aime": 467
Calgary gave HABS a 1st and Monahan to take on $6M cap. Not only do you want use to take $7M+ of cap and Evans you are only giving us a 2nd and more cap. Doesn`t make sense

the trade needs to be a 1st, a 2rd and McLeod to make any sense only because those picks are late in those rounds
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 avr. à 13 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,113
Mentions "j'aime": 10,984
CHI could be interested in something along those lines.
Hawksguy81, OldNYIfan et PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
15 avr. à 13 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,269
Mentions "j'aime": 732
Habs fans would probably want Bouchard for Anderson
Ausbear17 a aimé ceci.
15 avr. à 13 h 35
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,587
Mentions "j'aime": 744
Quoting: Newgod77
Habs fans would probably want Bouchard for Anderson


Mcdavid actually
15 avr. à 14 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 1,454
That would be a yes from the Hawks. Adding a 1st and a middle 6 winger prospect with some size would check off two things the Hawks would like. My ask would be to swap out Kulak for a RHD (one that is actually a right shot) like Ceci, Stecher, or Desharnais.
PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
15 avr. à 18 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
DQtalks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: BadaBing
Calgary gave HABS a 1st and Monahan to take on $6M cap. Not only do you want use to take $7M+ of cap and Evans you are only giving us a 2nd and more cap. Doesn`t make sense

the trade needs to be a 1st, a 2rd and McLeod to make any sense only because those picks are late in those rounds


UR TELLING me a possible 1rst and u can trade mcleod for more is bad
15 avr. à 19 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,115
Mentions "j'aime": 7,780
This is crazy. A 1st ++ for a third pairing defenseman? McLeod and a potential 1st for Josh ****ing Anderson and a downgrade at C??
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 avr. à 10 h 1
#9
Démarrer sujet
DQtalks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: CD282
This is crazy. A 1st ++ for a third pairing defenseman? McLeod and a potential 1st for Josh ****ing Anderson and a downgrade at C??


Every non bias fan and gms in the league would call evans a upgrade he has a 2 way game wins draws and does it all compared to mcleod. Guy was literally mcdavids winger last yr and hanst even hit more the 30pts
16 avr. à 10 h 2
#10
Démarrer sujet
DQtalks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: DQavis
Every non bias fan and gms in the league would call evans a upgrade he has a 2 way game wins draws and does it all compared to mcleod. Guy was literally mcdavids winger last yr and hanst even hit more the 30pts


Also its if he scores 20 goals thats good value

A late first for 3 yrs of a cheap anderson who would thrive with playmakers in edm
Retainment cost bud murphy better then kulak and ceci
16 avr. à 13 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,115
Mentions "j'aime": 7,780
Quoting: DQavis
Every non bias fan and gms in the league would call evans a upgrade he has a 2 way game wins draws and does it all compared to mcleod. Guy was literally mcdavids winger last yr and hanst even hit more the 30pts

McLeod has never spent significant time with McDavid, that's a complete fabrication.

He's also better offensively and defensively than Evans. He's bigger, younger and faster. There's zero upside here, so Edmonton declines. As with your other crazy trade spending a 1st+ for a 3rd pairing defenseman, lol.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
27 avr. à 14 h 42
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,695
Mentions "j'aime": 25,524
Be careful about baldly asserting things like "was literally McDavid's winger last year" without any factual basis for doing so, because when you get caught out by people far more knowledgeable about their team than you are, like @CD282, you look foolish and your opinions appear untrustworthy.

Similarly, overbroad pontifications like "Every non-biased fan and GM in the League" would have the same opinion on any issue short of "McDavid is better than DuBois" is risky and again calls your judgment into question when people like me point out that other than the modest difference in faceoff-win percentage, Evans has virtually no metric superior to McLeod; even Evans' extra 3/4 of a minute's time on ice simply renders McLeod's slightly better offensive production (including shooting percentage) more significant.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage