SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2L CentreMarn

Créé par: BriGuy
Équipe: 2024-25 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 avr. 2024
Publié: 11 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Things I think.

- Marner is not getting traded, and will be re-signed (8 x 12.5?). Take it as you will. I have been in the trade Marner camp for years, but he is just such an elite talent, just cant be replaced. However, he needs to drive his own line, at minimum be on a line apart from AM34. Why not become the 2C ??? If he (or Nylander for that matter, but I think Marner's definsive acumen + distribution make him the better fit) can be 2C, it will be so much easier (and cheaper) to find wingers than it will be to sign or trade for another 2C.

- I dont think Bert is re-signing. I think it was always a 1 year deal, a chance to boost his stock after not getting term last year. Plus, there will be a strong market for him and he will be priced out. Which sucks. Gimme Bert-AM-Domi for the next 3-4 years please! :( He brings such an underappreciated skill set to the team, good vision, great in the corners and net front, great when the game gets tight, etc.

-I dont know how to approach the G situation. On one hand, Woll hasn't proven he can carry the load, or even be part of a 1A/1B tandem with cheap goalie IMO. The UFA market is garbage (overpaying for a good backup in F/A rarely works). Plus, I don't that they will have to be able to swing a mid-season trade for a legit goalie if it hits the fan (no moveable $$$ outside Core4+Rielly).
*Based on Sammy's stats, his body of work in the playoffs and how he's bounced back this season, at the very least we can use these comparables:
-Mrazek 2x4.25
-Husso 3x4.75
-Korpisalo 5x4
-Jarry 5x5.375
-Elvis 5x5.4
-Campbell 5x5
-Grubauer 6x5.9
**I dont think I really want Sammy at that cap hit & term. He will likely get 4x$4.5 minimum on the open market. You have to think Woll is ready to be 1A by 25-26, and Hildeby not far after. If Woll flops, I guess you go the trade route, re-evaluate next year.
*** So if Sammy isn't available at 1x5 or 2x4ish, I would probably go G by committee with something like a Talbot/Nedjelkovic/Stolarz/Brossoit as a 1A/1B with Woll, and someone like Jones, Copely or Murray as a 3G.

-I think the Leafs will be priced out of the cream of the RD market (Roy / Pesce / Montour). These guys will get 6.5 +. DeMelo/Lyubushkin could also be something like Tanev/Carrier. (I went with age & familiarity), or maybe a Dumba, Walker, Myers, Chatfield or Desharnais somewhere in there.

-Without much D depth in the farm ready to step up, I think it's imperative to have at least #7 on the roster. As for FWDs, there are plenty of young waiver exempt guys chomping at the bit to play in a game or two whenever called upon.

Thats all for now i guess
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3825 000 $
3825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 100 000 $
13 000 000 $
21 350 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
53 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
2950 000 $
12 500 000 $
1800 000 $
34 000 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (STL)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $84 794 667 $0 $0 $2 705 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
13 250 000 $13 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
RFA
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
825 000 $825 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
845 833 $845 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
851 667 $851 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
825 000 $825 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
843 333 $843 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 avr. à 15 h 13
#1
Avid Sports Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 942
Mentions "j'aime": 261
The problem with the defense is outside of Reilly zero puck movers. The new NHL is fast and the defense needs to be able to move the puck up the ice. Makar, Toews, Hughes, Hronek, petrilangelo, Theodore, Josi, Letang, karlsson, Byram, dahlin, power, oel, ekblad, doughty, bouchard, ekholm, I can keep going on a huge list of defenseman. The problem with this defence core is Benoit, edmundson, lyubushkin, McCabe and demelo are below average puck movers. This will keep the puck in our zone too long. Not that those defensemen are bad but we need a defenseman like Liljegren or equivalent added because they are good puck movers as well. An ideal pairing is like Reilly demelo, ???, ??/Liljegren, Benoit /McCabe, edmundson could be ???, but we still need one more for good depth. Reilly has shown to prop up lyubushkin, Hainsey, Schenn etc... because he is a good puck mover. I get the idea where we need grit and toughness on the blueliner but everyone forgets that Tre had Andersson, Hanifin and weegar on defense as well. It was not all Zadorovs and Tanev s.
BriGuy et palhal a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,047
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Don't really see the blues wanting Kampf with his term
Mortarhead, BriGuy et xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 532
Mentions "j'aime": 268
No on Kampf unless you attach a decent pick for future considerations, and still probably not tbh

Keep that contract
Mortarhead, BriGuy et xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 26
#4
Avid Sports Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 942
Mentions "j'aime": 261
Quoting: Tennisman142
Don't really see the blues wanting Kampf with his term


His term is only 2 more years. There is lots of negotiation for a reliable bottom 6 six center. As Kampf is only marginally overpaid. Maybe not st Louis but I can see a scenario where he leafs gets a low round pick or upgraded low round pick like a 5th instead of a 7th with Kampf included.
BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 465
Mentions "j'aime": 79
Quoting: hockeynutter
The problem with the defense is outside of Reilly zero puck movers. The new NHL is fast and the defense needs to be able to move the puck up the ice. Makar, Toews, Hughes, Hronek, petrilangelo, Theodore, Josi, Letang, karlsson, Byram, dahlin, power, oel, ekblad, doughty, bouchard, ekholm, I can keep going on a huge list of defenseman. The problem with this defence core is Benoit, edmundson, lyubushkin, McCabe and demelo are below average puck movers. This will keep the puck in our zone too long. Not that those defensemen are bad but we need a defenseman like Liljegren or equivalent added because they are good puck movers as well. An ideal pairing is like Reilly demelo, ???, ??/Liljegren, Benoit /McCabe, edmundson could be ???, but we still need one more for good depth. Reilly has shown to prop up lyubushkin, Hainsey, Schenn etc... because he is a good puck mover. I get the idea where we need grit and toughness on the blueliner but everyone forgets that Tre had Andersson, Hanifin and weegar on defense as well. It was not all Zadorovs and Tanev s.


I dont know that I agree about your assessment of liljegren..hes had plenty of opportunity, but hes so soft in the Dzone. I pray he finds his game (like the way he played with Rielly being suspended..Id take that version np)..hes just so inconsistent although your spot on that he is a decent puck mover..Benny I think is an underated puck mover..maybe doesnt have the offensive acumen of the guys you listed (long list lol) but he reminds me of a sylvain lefebvre (showing my age) hard in in own zone and good 1st short pass up to forwards...Team D is more important than just Dmen (not saying D can be poor as dog crap either)
D by committee imo.
BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 465
Mentions "j'aime": 79
Quoting: Tennisman142
Don't really see the blues wanting Kampf with his term


I agree, (Im a leaf fan) no one taking on that contract for a 5th imo..would have to include a sweetner or higher draft pick (which we cant afford)
BriGuy et xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 39
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: hockeynutter
The problem with the defense is outside of Reilly zero puck movers. The new NHL is fast and the defense needs to be able to move the puck up the ice. Makar, Toews, Hughes, Hronek, petrilangelo, Theodore, Josi, Letang, karlsson, Byram, dahlin, power, oel, ekblad, doughty, bouchard, ekholm, I can keep going on a huge list of defenseman. The problem with this defence core is Benoit, edmundson, lyubushkin, McCabe and demelo are below average puck movers. This will keep the puck in our zone too long. Not that those defensemen are bad but we need a defenseman like Liljegren or equivalent added because they are good puck movers as well. An ideal pairing is like Reilly demelo, ???, ??/Liljegren, Benoit /McCabe, edmundson could be ???, but we still need one more for good depth. Reilly has shown to prop up lyubushkin, Hainsey, Schenn etc... because he is a good puck mover. I get the idea where we need grit and toughness on the blueliner but everyone forgets that Tre had Andersson, Hanifin and weegar on defense as well. It was not all Zadorovs and Tanev s.


I do agree with your take on puck moving Dmen, but I just dont see a viable option on creating a dominant D corps with at least 2 puck moving studs with the cap space they have. I just dont see Lilly as part of the future. I wish I did, but he is prone to making mistakes & gets beat to often by hard forechecking teams. The hockey-sense and play under pressure has been a knock on him since his draft year. Lets wait and see if he actually plays in the playoffs though. If not, I think the writing is on the wall.
11 avr. à 15 h 39
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 465
Mentions "j'aime": 79
I dont think spending 4M on Demelo is wise..let some other team overpay..and I love your breakdown of your logic behind your moves.
Sammys playoffs will determine his future...a cup contender needs a good G..im no Talbot fan (as a 1A or B)
granted Vegas won with that level G, they also have a beyter defensive structure (that would make Sammy look even better) and big strong Dmen. (which Leafs lack as we know)
personally id like to see Carrier (Nsh) come if he is priced right. and Id keep Timmins and Liljegren (at the right price)
Im looking fwd to seeing what this group can do this year before any decisions are made for next season..and Brad seems to be a better negotiator than Dubas so maybe we get a deal here or there.?
BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 16 h 15
#9
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
blues decline
11 avr. à 16 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,610
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Good post. No reason to trade Kampf - keep him & don’t sign Steele - our bottom 6 is flush with options. Agree that it will be difficult to keep both Bert & Domi, which sucks but such is for under Bettman’s cap.
Let’s wait for playoffs before judging Lil but he’s shown enough to be a 2nd/3rd pair guy.
Finally, 23 man roster with cap space seems wasteful; cut it down to 22 and spend to cap.
BriGuy et hockeynutter a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 16 h 27
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,754
Mentions "j'aime": 22,785
Kampf is difficult trade. Teams on his trade list, don't have cap for him. Why not keep Timmins, Leafs have the cap. Seems strange that Leafs could sign Brown for 800,000 but trade and get assets for the. more expensive Timmins
Rather have Liljegren than Edmundson or even Luby.
hockeynutter a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 16 h 29
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,754
Mentions "j'aime": 22,785
Quoting: Mortarhead
I dont think spending 4M on Demelo is wise..let some other team overpay..and I love your breakdown of your logic behind your moves.
Sammys playoffs will determine his future...a cup contender needs a good G..im no Talbot fan (as a 1A or B)
granted Vegas won with that level G, they also have a beyter defensive structure (that would make Sammy look even better) and big strong Dmen. (which Leafs lack as we know)
personally id like to see Carrier (Nsh) come if he is priced right. and Id keep Timmins and Liljegren (at the right price)
Im looking fwd to seeing what this group can do this year before any decisions are made for next season..and Brad seems to be a better negotiator than Dubas so maybe we get a deal here or there.?


Brad a better negotiator? That Huberdeau contract and seven years don't look good. Even eight years for Nylander is iffy.
11 avr. à 16 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 365
Mentions "j'aime": 62
The Blues just gave Sunny a 2 yr x 1.5M contract to be their 4C.

Look it up.
BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 17 h 15
#14
STL Blues GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 569
Mentions "j'aime": 87
jn no world are the blues interested in taking on kampf and his contract.
BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 17 h 16
#15
STL Blues GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 569
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: Armstrongs_burner
jn no world are the blues interested in taking on kampf and his contract.


Quoting: xercuses
blues decline


Quoting: Mortarhead
I agree, (Im a leaf fan) no one taking on that contract for a 5th imo..would have to include a sweetner or higher draft pick (which we cant afford)


hes just sunny but worse
xercuses et BriGuy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 17 h 18
#16
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 4,055
Mentions "j'aime": 893
I have asked this question multiple times and wonder Why? How does DeMelo get more than Bush? Bush will be on the PK and top pairing but gets 37.5% less money.
11 avr. à 17 h 21
#17
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
Quoting: Armstrongs_burner
hes just sunny but worse


and more expensive
11 avr. à 17 h 23
#18
STL Blues GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 569
Mentions "j'aime": 87
Quoting: xercuses
and more expensive


exactly, that falls under worse but im glad you said it
xercuses a aimé ceci.
12 avr. à 14 h 40
#19
Avid Sports Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 942
Mentions "j'aime": 261
Quoting: Mortarhead
I dont know that I agree about your assessment of liljegren..hes had plenty of opportunity, but hes so soft in the Dzone. I pray he finds his game (like the way he played with Rielly being suspended..Id take that version np)..hes just so inconsistent although your spot on that he is a decent puck mover..Benny I think is an underated puck mover..maybe doesnt have the offensive acumen of the guys you listed (long list lol) but he reminds me of a sylvain lefebvre (showing my age) hard in in own zone and good 1st short pass up to forwards...Team D is more important than just Dmen (not saying D can be poor as dog crap either)
D by committee imo.


Yes, it is hard to gauge Liljegren in terms of true potential but puck movers are still key. Carolina and Colorado are two terms stacked with puck movers and Carolina is always considered one of the best teams. The good part of Liljegren is actually that he still young. The common misconception is that players ripen around 22. Where in reality especially with defencemen and goalies the ripen around 25-27. Liljegren can also sign at a salary of about 3 million or less for 2-3 years. Liljegren is better than lyubushkin as lyubushkin outside.of playing with Reilly has really struggled in both Buffalo and Anaheim. This gives us time to gauge Liljegren. Also because after this coming year. You have another reported 4 million in salary increase. Marner is looking at max a 1.5 million increase in salary. Tavares will be looking at a huge discount or leaving. Anywhere from 3-6 million is what many insiders predict for his salary. Even at 6, that saves us another 5 million in salary. The ability to upgrade the defense will be much easier if Liljegren can grow. Also this past year Liljegren had 2 big injuries and in between those injuries when Reilly was suspended Liljegren pretty much carried the defense himself. He is averaging between the 2nd and 4th most TOI every game. At his age a bridge deal where we basically double his salary is smart. His defence even with the warts is well worth around 2.5 million. He can also still easily improve to make his deal a steal for 2-3 years.
12 avr. à 14 h 43
#20
Avid Sports Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 942
Mentions "j'aime": 261
Quoting: palhal
Kampf is difficult trade. Teams on his trade list, don't have cap for him. Why not keep Timmins, Leafs have the cap. Seems strange that Leafs could sign Brown for 800,000 but trade and get assets for the. more expensive Timmins
Rather have Liljegren than Edmundson or even Luby.


I agree we can sign Liljegren according to most experts for about 2.75 to 3, even with his problems we have a reliable top 4 that can move he puck and still improve. It is better than lyubushkin whom is propped by Reilly and on most teams they would use him as a 5-7 defenseman.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage