Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

jaok3

Marner rocks
Membre depuis
15 jun 2021
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Deuxième équipe favorite
Oilers d'Edmonton
Messages dans les forums
507
Messages par jour
3.81
Sujets de discussion
35
Forum: Armchair-GMSat at 10:23 am
Sujet: one more game before a change on the top line
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>I think they should use Ritchie in certain situations. On offensive draws he can be out with AM and MM where as soon as Matthews wins bam Ritchie goes to screen the goalie and be a net front presence.

But on defensive of start of the period faceoffs he should be swapped with Kerfoot or Bunting.

That way you are getting the best out of him

Now as for the PP

One thing I have noticed

While the PP has looked sharper I think we need to confront the elephant in the room.

RN we are running a 1-3-1 style which is nice. But Rielly seems to be a problem in this new style. Rielly rn is on the point which is where he should be, except if we look at how he scores he often scores in similar positions to where Point and Stamkos get their goals on the PP (either the bumper position or LFC) and thats where Marner and Nylander currently sit and that's the problem. I think its time to move him into the LFC and move either Marner or Nylander to the Point. Sure its risky but I feel that will lead to more success as with Rielly seemingly not wanting to slapshot from the point could be worth while to put someone who is not afraid of point shots.</div></div>

what the #1 pp needs is a guy in front of the net. . Against SJ the 2nd pp unit because guys were in front of the net generated more chances in their 30 seconds of pp time then the first unit did in a minute and a half. Keefe needs to take Tavares off the #1 unit and put Simmonds or Ritchie in front of the net. Their doing exactly what they did last year when the pp fell off the map the 2nd half of the season. The only difference is they moved Marner to the bumper spot where he looks completely out of place
Forum: Armchair-GM15 oct à 12 h 41
Sujet: why does this trade make sense for toronto
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bagelbob</b></div><div>i feel like if the leafs trade marner, it needs to be for some combo of picks and a solid forward prospect + top/middle six player who’s getting paid &lt;$7m. if they trade him, they’re doing it to improve the depth on the team, not to acquire a better player. tkachuk just adds another really expensive forward with a tiny bit of extra cap space.</div></div>

The leafs would want the other teams best forward- 2nd best defenseman and a first rounder. This kid has made every center he's played with have a career year in goals. He also would quarterback the pp and be the best pk player. There isn't a player the leafs would trade straight up for Marner in the league of course excluding McDaivd, McKinnon and Draisaitl.