Mason = untouchable

Trevor = you don’t have what we want // you don’t give up what we want

1: Completely unavailable, asking gets the phone slammed on you, you should know better than to even ask.

2: Rich, top 6/4 RW or RHD of appropriate age, other pieces to balance

Brandt Clarke will cost Jack Hughes. Nothing short of that even starts a conversation.

Kaliyev can be had for a mid-to-late 2nd round pick.

Ferraro would take a late 1st. Granlund would like take a late 1stas well. I think you get something back — 4th or 5th.

If you are talking about NJ first which is say 10OA.

Sharks 10th overall

NJD Ferraro + Granlund + TB 3rd + Vegas 4th.

I think the Sharks have to take that even if they don’t want to let go of those 4 assets.

Oh.. you would be asking the wrong person for this question, when it comes to Bouchard. I’ll try not to be a homer haha… it would probably be a young top 6 forward. A guy that comes to mind would be Shane Pinto for example. He’s a good skilled top 6 forward that I personally like, and am very high on. However, trading him would be a mistake, as we would open a HUGE hole on defence, but then cover one in another area.

For McLeod, I would be more lenient. Probably like a good 2nd, as he is valued decently, and plays a key role for the Oilers. I would also let him go in a package for a good defender too, if you are looking at a package like deal. We would of course need someone lined up to cover for him, but he would be easier to replace than Bouchard.

Bouch - Essentially untouchable but probably an overpay of a 1st round pick + a top-4 RD/Top-6 RW with term

Mcleod - A good 2nd pairing RD or a 2nd

If yall want Yegor it’s probably a 1st + a third , and for Marky it’s probably a late first, or center prospect

Hronek: probably a bit more value wise than the Canucks fave up for him, but they’d likely want a top 6 forward/top 4 dman as the return in a hockey trade, and that’s only if they can’t get him signed

Lekkerimaki: likely untouchable unless it’s in a deal for a star player that has term at a manageable cap hit

Brandt Clarke for Jack Hughes. Lol.

Some of these are wild, eh? Ferraro, and Granlund getting 1sts makes no sense either imo. No way Clarke gets Hughes.. Hughes has so much more value, it’s not even funny.

Holtz for Ferraro, Granlund and a 2nd (NJD 2nd from Meier trade)