SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying to fill out a roster

Créé par: glarson17
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 mars 2024
Publié: 14 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
-in my opinion, couture won’t play another game in his career. He will either be on LTIR, or just IR to meet the floor, or he can moved to a team wanting to utilize LTIR.

-They should let the old kids play and the new kids summer. Let Eklund, Bordeleau, Thrun, Mukhamadullin, Zetterlund go wild. Maybe let Gushchin get in on thd NHL action. Players like Will Smith, Quinten Musty and whomever they draft this year should just get another year at least, no need to rush them.

-The sharks should look to other teams needing to shed cap for more veteran presence on the team and maybe they can pick up more picks along the way.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1800 000 $
1925 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Has a larger cat hit for the production he’s putting out. Vancouver has a bit of their roster to fill out, particularly defense, and this move gives them much more flexibility.

Thoughts? Fair?
VAN
  1. Addison, Calen [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Cheap depth defense
2.
SJS
  1. Dvorak, Christian
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Thoughts? I don’t know that Montreal needs to dump him but I’m not sure there’s much of a market for him. I’d be interested in Anderson but would want more to dump him. Seems like Montreal thinks he has positive value though? I don’t see it with that cap hit.
MTL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de SJS
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $73 606 667 $0 $1 250 000 $13 893 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars à 15 h 39
#1
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,138
Mentions "j'aime": 2,289
MTL has 0 need to dump Dvorak, especially since he is very welcomed in the lineup when healthy. But in terms of dump value, it is one of the lighter ones I've seen recently, so good job on that
14 mars à 15 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,619
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Quoting: Caufield
MTL has 0 need to dump Dvorak, especially since he is very welcomed in the lineup when healthy. But in terms of dump value, it is one of the lighter ones I've seen recently, so good job on that


If the dump is that cheap( that our 8th or9th pick in the 2025 draft atm) I think they wpuld do it simply as it adds more flexibility.
Caufield a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 15 h 59
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,588
Mentions "j'aime": 6,730
I think if the Habs needed the cap and roster space for a center, they'd probably do this for Dvorak. Center depth is weak so moving him is only necessary if they intend to replace him with someone better. If not they have little reason to move him. They'd just have to go get another Dvorak type center again so its defeats the purpose.

Anderson on the other hand, if there is a move to be made, I'd be interested in. I think Habs mgmt would welcome moving him for pennies on the dollar right now and frankly even with sweeteners to move him out if need be. ONLY if its to remove his cap entirely though. They're not retaining on him and if they take someone back, that contract has to be off their books soonish. If those criteria can't be met, they might as well buy him out then.
14 mars à 16 h 0
#4
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,138
Mentions "j'aime": 2,289
Quoting: Black61
If the dump is that cheap( that our 8th or9th pick in the 2025 draft atm) I think they wpuld do it simply as it adds more flexibility.


Don't forget how freakishly injured we tend to get. Having depth is a must for MTL, so if we have the cap, we should keep him
BorisBagel a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 16 h 6
#5
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,323
Grier needs to be getting way more back for cap dumps.
14 mars à 16 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,619
Mentions "j'aime": 1,668
Quoting: Caufield
Don't forget how freakishly injured we tend to get. Having depth is a must for MTL, so if we have the cap, we should keep him


Its doesnt preclude the team from signing someone else to replace him. Hes been a fairly big part of the injury issue so signing someone less injury prpne wpuld be a benefit.
14 mars à 16 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 773
Mentions "j'aime": 260
Canucks def accept imo
14 mars à 16 h 24
#8
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,646
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Quoting: BrockChoy
Canucks def accept imo


Why would they dump Mikheyev? They have no spot for Addison on the blueline, and the $4.75M you're freeing up will just go back to a top 6 replacement who's likely very similar to Mikheyev's production.
Billy316 a aimé ceci.
14 mars à 16 h 32
#9
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,576
Mentions "j'aime": 723
Quoting: Caufield
MTL has 0 need to dump Dvorak, especially since he is very welcomed in the lineup when healthy. But in terms of dump value, it is one of the lighter ones I've seen recently, so good job on that


Its the cost of RS for 1 year and we get a pick back which most dont.
I'd do it for the simple fact Laval's over crowded this year with Beck, among others joining them
Kapanen is looking like Fire and scored almost all his points in 2024. From what i hear he's set to join Lavals Playoffs as a trial run for them
Most important is Florian Xhekaj moved to Center scoring 20 goals in 27 games for 31 goals and 55 pts in 57 games. He's been on fire since becoming a Center.
Way he's going with the time he has left 50 goals isnt out of the question for this Pest Goal Scorer who stands 6'4 at about 205lbs last update his moms gave online in a fan Q&A

Now's the time to get Gignac and Condotta in those 3rd and 4th C roles to create room in Laval
Or we wait re-signing Monahan this summer letting the chips fall where they may at Camp
Either way having Dvo gone at the very minimum gives us the cap to RS for another team later in the year to get a 4th back
Personally i'd just buy out DVO and move Armia
14 mars à 17 h 26
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,145
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Quoting: jfkst1
Grier needs to be getting way more back for cap dumps.


Of course he should want to but in both of these he gets players with shorter term contracts with manageable cap hits that helps them reach the cap floor. He recoups earlier round picks on top of it. Both players could be moved at a deadline too for even more assets.
14 mars à 17 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,145
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Quoting: F50marco
I think if the Habs needed the cap and roster space for a center, they'd probably do this for Dvorak. Center depth is weak so moving him is only necessary if they intend to replace him with someone better. If not they have little reason to move him. They'd just have to go get another Dvorak type center again so its defeats the purpose.

Anderson on the other hand, if there is a move to be made, I'd be interested in. I think Habs mgmt would welcome moving him for pennies on the dollar right now and frankly even with sweeteners to move him out if need be. ONLY if its to remove his cap entirely though. They're not retaining on him and if they take someone back, that contract has to be off their books soonish. If those criteria can't be met, they might as well buy him out then.


I would be interested in Anderson especially if he came with incentives. Sharks need cap to make the floor and to fill out that roster
14 mars à 19 h 7
#12
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 7,041
Mentions "j'aime": 4,431
Montreal isn't paying a 4th to save a million dollars when they will probably be able to get close to Wennberg's return if he has a decent season next year.
14 mars à 19 h 29
#13
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: cooliny
Why would they dump Mikheyev? They have no spot for Addison on the blueline, and the $4.75M you're freeing up will just go back to a top 6 replacement who's likely very similar to Mikheyev's production.


Like no goals (until last night) in what 20+ games production? That can be had for league min. That said i'd expect Mikheyev to be better next season as his injured heals but getting rid of his salary for that cheap would be easy yes.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage