SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Provorov Peeke and Kuraly

Créé par: Brad_Treliving
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 mars 2024
Publié: 4 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Kuraly, Sean
  2. Peeke, Andrew
  3. Provorov, Ivan (2 225 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Brodie, TJ
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 843 950 $0 $0 $656 050 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mars à 7 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 94
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Does that package even get Provorov retained?
JacketsComrade, Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 7 h 59
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,692
Mentions "j'aime": 816
Quoting: Treleafing
Does that package even get Provorov retained?


I would throw in Robertson as well but if I'm the Leafs, those are the players I'm targeting
4 mars à 8 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 244
yall, we’re really last in the conference for a reason, do you really think you get better by taking 16% of our lineup?
4 mars à 8 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: Treleafing
Does that package even get Provorov retained?


No, it’s not that helpful. Picks aren’t that good and lily only makes our RHD logjam worse because he’s better than Peeke. We’d have no choice but to trade his RFA rights this summer because it’d be bad asset management to try and keep him when we know Jiricek has a higher ceiling and Severson and Gudbranson are both unmoveable.

Peeke would be thrown in for free but we’d have an asking price for Kuraly so value for us and our roster/needs specifically is way off.
Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 8 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,909
Mentions "j'aime": 7,427
Just the weirdest obsession with defencemen who arnt good.
JacketsComrade, MitchJr et palhal a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 8 h 16
#6
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,577
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Peeke barely plays in Columbus but, he's the answer for the top pair in Toronto? This might be the wrong decision
JacketsComrade, palhal et mokumboi a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 8 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,257
👎🏻
4 mars à 8 h 28
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,113
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Peeke barely plays in Columbus but, he's the answer for the top pair in Toronto? This might be the wrong decision


So many so called Leaf fan, just hate their own. Plus they have an obsession with any RHD.
The Peeke/Provo for Liljegren/Brodie exchange, the Leafs lose big time this season, and for the future and the cap implications later.
4 mars à 8 h 33
#9
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,577
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: palhal
So many so called Leaf fan, just hate their own. Plus they have an obsession with any RHD.
The Peeke/Provo for Liljegren/Brodie exchange, the Leafs lose big time this season, and for the future and the cap implications later.


Oh dude don't get me wrong I HATE THE LEAFS and I look forward to them failing in the playoffs again this year lol! Me pointing out that the trade isn't good doesn't change that
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 8 h 35
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,113
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Oh dude don't get me wrong I HATE THE LEAFS and I look forward to them failing in the playoffs again this year lol! Me pointing out that the trade isn't good doesn't change that


I should ;point out that 15 teams a year fail in the playoff, plus another 16 teams don't fail in the playoffs because they aren't even in the playoffs.
4 mars à 8 h 36
#11
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,577
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: palhal
I should ;point out that 15 teams a year fail in the playoff, plus another 16 teams don't fail in the playoffs because they aren't even in the playoffs.


Fair but only 1 teams failure brings joy to 31 other teams fanbases
4 mars à 8 h 53
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 3,692
Mentions "j'aime": 816
Quoting: lowblocksniper
Peeke barely plays in Columbus but, he's the answer for the top pair in Toronto? This might be the wrong decision


I was told by the Athletic fans and the calculators that Simon Benoit was bad because of his player card
4 mars à 10 h 22
#13
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,479
Quoting: Treleafing
Does that package even get Provorov retained?


It should, I think Columbus would happily toss him over for that. He's not good. And not liked in locker rooms.
4 mars à 10 h 25
#14
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,479
Quoting: palhal
I should ;point out that 15 teams a year fail in the playoff, plus another 16 teams don't fail in the playoffs because they aren't even in the playoffs.


You kinda abandoned the main point there. It's a bad trade for the Leafs. When other teams' fans are all saying that, it's probably not a good sign.
4 mars à 11 h 39
#15
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,954
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: mokumboi
It should, I think Columbus would happily toss him over for that. He's not good. And not liked in locker rooms.

He's not quite that bad. We'd expect better value back - he's perfectly fine as a middle-pairing guy, and judging by how he's acquitted himself here he's made his peace with that role. But he is available, mostly because he was only ever intended as a stopgap unless he did truly exceptional work and he hasn't been truly exceptional, just good.
benjgc a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 13 h 29
#16
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,479
Quoting: Viqsi
He's not quite that bad. We'd expect better value back - he's perfectly fine as a middle-pairing guy, and judging by how he's acquitted himself here he's made his peace with that role. But he is available, mostly because he was only ever intended as a stopgap unless he did truly exceptional work and he hasn't been truly exceptional, just good.


Hmm. I think we'll have to agree to disagree. He's paid like a 1st pairing guy (yes, I know he's partially retained, but you paid for that in another way), used like a 2nd pairing guy and has the defensive impacts of a depth Dman. Maybe it's not true, but I keep hearing/reading CLB is eager to get rid of him. Some of that may be that he is obviously not going to a popular figure in a college town, I dunno.
4 mars à 13 h 54
#17
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,373
Mentions "j'aime": 4,695
Quoting: mokumboi
Hmm. I think we'll have to agree to disagree. He's paid like a 1st pairing guy (yes, I know he's partially retained, but you paid for that in another way), used like a 2nd pairing guy and has the defensive impacts of a depth Dman. Maybe it's not true, but I keep hearing/reading CLB is eager to get rid of him. Some of that may be that he is obviously not going to a popular figure in a college town, I dunno.


Teams don't give a rat's bald ass about players' personal beliefs or what fans think of those beliefs. There isn't a team in the league that cares about what Provorov did and I guarantee you that 90+% of hockey ops people agree with him. No, he doesn't seem to be popular with his teammates (he is notably absent in our other Russian players' social media where all of them are always present plus our Latvian and our Frenchman). But the "eager to get rid of him" is all fan-based. And the Blue Jackets very notoriously don't care what we think at all.

We didn't pay him in the first place, and if we retain, he's suddenly got a cap hit under 4 million and is extremely valuable to a lot of teams. The original contract is entirely sunk cost. He is very much worth 4 million. Someone will pay a first for him, whether it's Friday, over the summer, or next deadline.
Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
4 mars à 14 h 14
#18
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,479
Quoting: squashmaple
Teams don't give a rat's bald ass about players' personal beliefs or what fans think of those beliefs. There isn't a team in the league that cares about what Provorov did and I guarantee you that 90+% of hockey ops people agree with him.

No, he doesn't seem to be popular with his teammates (he is notably absent in our other Russian players' social media where all of them are always present plus our Latvian and our Frenchman).

But the "eager to get rid of him" is all fan-based.

We didn't pay him in the first place...

He is very much worth 4 million.

Someone will pay a first for him, whether it's Friday, over the summer, or next deadline.


1 - Well, that is all just simply not accurate. Some of it is wildly off. I'll leave it at that.

2 - I really think you are underplaying how impactful this can be. Especially to a new GM regime walking in the door.

3 - I'm not talking about fan chatter. I'm talking about media chatter.

4 - CLB gave up the draft slot where Bonk went (which was pure idiocy... loads of other excellent prospects were also still available) and what will presumably be a high 25 2nd to get Provy retained like that. Oh, you definitely are paying for part of his salary. Paying more than it is worth, actually.

5 - To who? When?

6 - Oh my... please do not hold your breath over getting a 1st for Provy. That would be harmful to your health.

It's one thing to think he's been okay as a 2LD for his AAV. But c'mon. Be real.
4 mars à 15 h 5
#19
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,373
Mentions "j'aime": 4,695
Quoting: mokumboi
1 - Well, that is all just simply not accurate. Some of it is wildly off. I'll leave it at that.

2 - I really think you are underplaying how impactful this can be. Especially to a new GM regime walking in the door.

3 - I'm not talking about fan chatter. I'm talking about media chatter.

4 - CLB gave up the draft slot where Bonk went (which was pure idiocy... loads of other excellent prospects were also still available) and what will presumably be a high 25 2nd to get Provy retained like that. Oh, you definitely are paying for part of his salary. Paying more than it is worth, actually.

5 - To who? When?

6 - Oh my... please do not hold your breath over getting a 1st for Provy. That would be harmful to your health.

It's one thing to think he's been okay as a 2LD for his AAV. But c'mon. Be real.


He's not popular, not with fans or teammates. We agree on that. But hockey ops people don't care that he "hates the gays." Most of them do, too, probably without even the veneer of blaming Orthodox Christianity like Provorov did. They're just smart enough not to make statements. Macho hockey he-man culture? Come on. Have you met a hockey player?

CBJ made moves requested by Babcock. He wanted two veteran D, possibly even Provorov and Severson specifically. But even without Babcock in the mix, Columbus 100% had to make at least one blueline move last offseason for an established player. They couldn't risk another year of finding themselves needing to use Billy Sweezy in the NHL. They moved a first acquired in a previous trade for two UFA's whose time in Columbus was over. It was house money. It was worth the opportunity cost of a player who won't see the NHL til 2025 at the earliest to bring in help now to a blueline that was utterly devastated and devoid of any talent. Obviously I wish it hadn't been Provorov (ffs, I AM LGBT MYSELF AND I AM SO TIRED OF HAVING TO TALK ABOUT HIM), but trading that late first for a mid-20s defenseman with pedigree was absolutely the right choice. I don't care if fans of a team that made the playoffs think otherwise. You didn't have to watch the Blue Jackets defense in 2022-23. Idiocy would have been doing nothing and going into a new season with the same collection of AHLers, injury risks, and children on ELCs they ended the year with.

They had to do something, and they had capital to do so that didn't affect their own picks in that draft at all. Provorov is a former top 10 pick who's still an actual NHL caliber player; you yourself even acknowledged he's a fine for the second pair. The Flyers signed him to his current deal in 2019, before the pandemic and when he was, in fact, very much a first pairing defenseman. 6.75 for that is fantastic. He's currently retained down to 4.725, thanks to Rob Blake's foolishness, and it is very easy for Columbus to retain up to half of that for a year.

So yes, someone will pay a first for a second pair caliber rental defenseman at (likely) under four million dollars. Like I said, maybe not this coming Friday. But over the summer or next deadline? Yes, someone will. And it won't be St. Louis, so I'm not sure why you care so much. You've got the corpses of Torey Krug and Nick Leddy for much, much longer to worry about. Provorov is just here to keep Denton Mateychuk's roster spot warm.
Viqsi, benjgc et CBJ_Bob a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage