SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Crack at this

Créé par: Shaners79
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 17 févr. 2024
Publié: 17 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
To me the Devils are taking all the risk so maybe Calgary can find a team to retain some of Markstrom's salary. Devils also add a good value player like Pospisil. Holtz will get the playing time which he deserves and the Flames get a coveted offensive defenseman in Casey.
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (1 400 000 $ retained)
  2. Pospisil, Martin
  3. Tanev, Christopher
Détails additionnels:
Third team retention
CGY
  1. Casey, Seamus [Liste de réserve]
  2. Holtz, Alexander
  3. Vanecek, Vitek
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Moves to 25 if Devils make conference final
2.
NJD
CBJ
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Thanks JD
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $75 173 333 $422 500 $4 632 500 $8 326 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 févr. à 23 h 38
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,965
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Do not get fooled by Calgary fans. This is a ridiculous overpay
Shaners79 a aimé ceci.
17 févr. à 23 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 596
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Flames decline.

They aren't retaining on Markstrom for 2.5 years and taking on Vanacek's contract AND add Tanev, AND adding Pospisil
Shaners79 et MoxNix a aimé ceci.
17 févr. à 23 h 47
#3
Démarrer sujet
Shaners79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: DontTradeDougie
Flames decline.

They aren't retaining on Markstrom for 2.5 years and taking on Vanacek's contract AND add Tanev, AND adding Pospisil


The retention is going to the third party
17 févr. à 23 h 48
#4
Démarrer sujet
Shaners79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: dgibb10
Do not get fooled by Calgary fans. This is a ridiculous overpay


What would you remove?
17 févr. à 23 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,360
Mentions "j'aime": 18,411
Did Conway get green light to retain salary? That was supposed to be the hold up.
17 févr. à 23 h 49
#6
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,965
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Quoting: Shaners79
What would you remove?


Tanev, Holtz, Casey, popsosil

1st+Vitek for markstrom
3rd for 1 mill in retention imo
17 févr. à 23 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
Shaners79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Did Conway get green light to retain salary? That was supposed to be the hold up.


Columbus retaining
17 févr. à 23 h 52
#8
Démarrer sujet
Shaners79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: dgibb10
Tanev, Holtz, Casey, popsosil

1st+Vitek for markstrom
3rd for 1 mill in retention imo


I'm pretty sure Savard was retained by Detroit for a 4th
17 févr. à 23 h 53
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,965
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Quoting: Shaners79
I'm pretty sure Savard was retained by Detroit for a 4th


More years tho. I'd go a bit higher maybe but Holtz AND Casey is a non starter in my eyes
18 févr. à 0 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,360
Mentions "j'aime": 18,411
Quoting: Shaners79
Columbus retaining


The cost for $1.4m x 3 would likely be a bit higher…probably 2nd or 3rd+

Maybe something like

CGY gives: Markstrom, $0.75m x 3
CGY gets: Holtz, Merzlikins

CBJ gives: Merzlikins, $1.25m x 3 (on Markstrom)
CBJ gets: Vanecek (at $1.7m), NJD 2nd, NJD 3rd

NJD gives: Holtz, Vanecek, $1.7m x 2, 2nd, 3rd
NJD gets: Markstrom (at $4m)
CaseyFlyman et benjgc a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 0 h 21
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,451
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The cost for $1.4m x 3 would likely be a bit higher…probably 2nd or 3rd+

Maybe something like

CGY gives: Markstrom, $0.75m x 3
CGY gets: Holtz, Merzlikins

CBJ gives: Merzlikins, $1.25m x 3 (on Markstrom)
CBJ gets: Vanecek (at $1.7m), NJD 2nd, NJD 3rd

NJD gives: Holtz, Vanecek, $1.7m x 2, 2nd, 3rd
NJD gets: Markstrom (at $4m)


Dreamer...
18 févr. à 0 h 30
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,360
Mentions "j'aime": 18,411
Quoting: MoxNix
Dreamer...


I know I know…

Mercer, Siegenthaler, Holtz, Casey, 1st, 1st

…Fitzy just signed an extension, but wants to get fired tomorrow
18 févr. à 1 h 5
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,451
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Modifié 18 févr. à 1 h 10
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I know I know…

Mercer, Siegenthaler, Holtz, Casey, 1st, 1st

…Fitzy just signed an extension, but wants to get fired tomorrow


Don't be ridiculous I never suggested anything even remotely close to that. I said it needs to start with Mercer and a 1st.

Besides starting to bore me you're becoming annoying with how you keep trying to put words in my mouth. Stop it now.
18 févr. à 1 h 29
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Columbus wouldn't be the team to retain, since we historically haven't been that 3rd team. And honestly, I don't think it's realistic to ask a 3rd team to retain for two more years, unless you're sending at least a 2nd to a team that has to hit the cap floor, and has no aspirations of competing in the next 2 years. Since that's basically only Chicago, and possibly Anaheim or San Jose...it probably ups the price to a full first. Even retaining $1-1.5M for 2.5 seasons is a big ask, and I think finding a team to be that agent would be the biggest hangup on a trade.

(And no, teams can't just retain for one year of the multi-year deal...it's a percentage of the contract, and you're on the hook for the duration of the deal even if it's bought out for some reason, no takebacks).

The goalie market is definitely a buyer's market right now, but Calgary seems resolute in not retaining salary (even if it means they receive less). Neither of those situations favor Calgary. I don't envy Conroy...you either retain, take less, or just hold onto him. The first two scenarios: you lose. The second scenario: let's just way I doubt Markstrom stays top-4 in GSAx next season, his value is likely at a peak right now, so if you hold on you lose, and potentially block Wolf.

Calgary should have moved Markstrom when Carolina, NJ, Edmonton, and Toronto all desperately needed goaltending IMO. Timing is everything, you can't wait forever and expect to be able to make the right decision when you want to.
benjgc, Friendly_Cannon et SK101 a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 2 h 54
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,791
Mentions "j'aime": 3,261
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Columbus wouldn't be the team to retain, since we historically haven't been that 3rd team. And honestly, I don't think it's realistic to ask a 3rd team to retain for two more years, unless you're sending at least a 2nd to a team that has to hit the cap floor, and has no aspirations of competing in the next 2 years. Since that's basically only Chicago, and possibly Anaheim or San Jose...it probably ups the price to a full first. Even retaining $1-1.5M for 2.5 seasons is a big ask, and I think finding a team to be that agent would be the biggest hangup on a trade.

(And no, teams can't just retain for one year of the multi-year deal...it's a percentage of the contract, and you're on the hook for the duration of the deal even if it's bought out for some reason, no takebacks).

The goalie market is definitely a buyer's market right now, but Calgary seems resolute in not retaining salary (even if it means they receive less). Neither of those situations favor Calgary. I don't envy Conroy...you either retain, take less, or just hold onto him. The first two scenarios: you lose. The second scenario: let's just way I doubt Markstrom stays top-4 in GSAx next season, his value is likely at a peak right now, so if you hold on you lose, and potentially block Wolf.

Calgary should have moved Markstrom when Carolina, NJ, Edmonton, and Toronto all desperately needed goaltending IMO. Timing is everything, you can't wait forever and expect to be able to make the right decision when you want to.


Off a quick glance I thought you wrote a novel on us being cheap 😂
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 11 h 41
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
Off a quick glance I thought you wrote a novel on us being cheap 😂


The McConnel family, despite a net worth of nearly $1.1B as reported by Forbes, has historically run the Columbus Blue Jackets organization as miserly as possible. In this essay I will...
dgibb10 et Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 11 h 47
#17
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,965
Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Columbus wouldn't be the team to retain, since we historically haven't been that 3rd team. And honestly, I don't think it's realistic to ask a 3rd team to retain for two more years, unless you're sending at least a 2nd to a team that has to hit the cap floor, and has no aspirations of competing in the next 2 years. Since that's basically only Chicago, and possibly Anaheim or San Jose...it probably ups the price to a full first. Even retaining $1-1.5M for 2.5 seasons is a big ask, and I think finding a team to be that agent would be the biggest hangup on a trade.

(And no, teams can't just retain for one year of the multi-year deal...it's a percentage of the contract, and you're on the hook for the duration of the deal even if it's bought out for some reason, no takebacks).

The goalie market is definitely a buyer's market right now, but Calgary seems resolute in not retaining salary (even if it means they receive less). Neither of those situations favor Calgary. I don't envy Conroy...you either retain, take less, or just hold onto him. The first two scenarios: you lose. The second scenario: let's just way I doubt Markstrom stays top-4 in GSAx next season, his value is likely at a peak right now, so if you hold on you lose, and potentially block Wolf.

Calgary should have moved Markstrom when Carolina, NJ, Edmonton, and Toronto all desperately needed goaltending IMO. Timing is everything, you can't wait forever and expect to be able to make the right decision when you want to.


That’s the problem with the goalie market. It changes rapidly.

Skinner got his **** together, Freddy Andersen about to come back, Daws looks fantastic, rittich looks very good and the kings have no more cap space, and Samsonov looks better+woll is about to come back.

The only thing that’s played in their favour is ig the flyers losing hart but no chance they buy a Markstrom
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
18 févr. à 12 h 3
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Quoting: dgibb10
That’s the problem with the goalie market. It changes rapidly.

Skinner got his **** together, Freddy Andersen about to come back, Daws looks fantastic, rittich looks very good and the kings have no more cap space, and Samsonov looks better+woll is about to come back.

The only thing that’s played in their favour is ig the flyers losing hart but no chance they buy a Markstrom


The problem with goalies themselves is they change rapidly! I don't think we'll see a goalie market as hot as we did a few weeks ago when none were moved. Even with Philly maybe needing another goalie, Ersson has been fine and Philly seems more positioned to sell than buy this year. Even Montreal is having trouble moving Allen. Barring injury to a playoff-contender's starter, the market probably doesn't get that hot again this season.
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage