SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Idear

Créé par: Shibbal18
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 12 janv. 2024
Publié: 12 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Krebs, Peyton
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Romaine, Chris [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
3.
BUF
  1. Jones, Seth (750 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Östlund, Noah
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $78 801 904 $0 $4 807 500 $4 698 096 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
8 750 000 $8 750 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 janv. à 9 h 54
#1
Lol
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 61
if Philly can get Krebs and a 2nd for Laughton Briere needs to go into the HOF
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 3
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,698
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Hawks would never retain for the length of that contract. That alone is a deal breaker.
Garak et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 3
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: DumbHockeyTrades
if Philly can get Krebs and a 2nd for Laughton Briere needs to go into the HOF


Wasn't Laughton worth a ton just a couple months ago?
Shibbal18 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 3
#4
Démarrer sujet
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,608
Mentions "j'aime": 9,207
Quoting: JK74
Hawks would never retain for the length of that contract. That alone is a deal breaker.


It's less than a minimum contract lol
12 janv. à 10 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: JK74
Hawks would never retain for the length of that contract. That alone is a deal breaker.


Yeah. Was just gonna say this. CHI should be open to moving Jones, but retention just isn't going to happen.
JK74 et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,974
Mentions "j'aime": 4,806
The value on the Avs trade is fine but the only real concerns are (even though Mittelstadt is RFA) whether they could afford to re-sign him and whether he'd be the right fit for the Avs style.
HockeyManiac95 et M96N29 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


For 6 years though. And what if he goes downhill like OEL, and BUF buys him out or something? CHI would then be stuck with a smaller cost, but the buyout penalty would extend the use of our retention slot by double the remaining term. Like how AZ is stuck with OEL's retention slot for a billion years after VAN bought him out. Plus, the dollars added up is A LOT of money to retain. Idk. Maybe Hawks brass would be open to it. But that is a lot of salary. Then again, that is a pretty darn good offer that would essentially recoup most of the assets we spent on Jones in the first place.

What's going on anyway? Is BUF feeling less comfortable with Dahlin on the right side now? I thought I remembered people saying he was "better" on his off side.
JK74, Hawksguy81 et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 14
#8
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,309
Mentions "j'aime": 1,650
I feel like Avs decline for now because we need someone who we know won't be just a rental and we can pay him next year if needed. Nice trade tho
TJTwolf, Garak, Anus_McLeod and 2 others a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,301
Mentions "j'aime": 1,007
Quoting: Garak
Wasn't Laughton worth a ton just a couple months ago?


Yeah and technically he still would be. He is absolutely adored in Philly.

Having said that, Philly says yes to this. There's a greater need for Philly to gather futures now than there was a few months ago
Garak et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 27
#10
It's Just a Guess
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: DumbHockeyTrades
if Philly can get Krebs and a 2nd for Laughton Briere needs to go into the HOF

Actually Briere should and could get more. What has Krebs done in the NHL?
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 30
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,805
Mentions "j'aime": 12,035
Quoting: DH28Hockey
Yeah and technically he still would be. He is absolutely adored in Philly.

Having said that, Philly says yes to this. There's a greater need for Philly to gather futures now than there was a few months ago


Yeah. With their tank out the window and hopes of a high draft pick likely along with it, they need to accumulate futures, for sure. Not to mention Cutter being gone now.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 31
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,508
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


That's not the point. That uses up one of their 3 spots for 6 years.
Garak, JK74 et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 39
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,698
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


It doesn't matter. That could be the difference between signing a player if another team offers $750k more.
Garak et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 10 h 48
#14
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,099
Mentions "j'aime": 10,561
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


But didn't TOR do that with Hot Dog and then for the next 6 years you look at you cap and it's just magically less by $750k-$1M.
JK74 et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 12 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,060
Mentions "j'aime": 859
So essentially this is: trade the player who’s been our best forward this year and 2 firsts (Ostlund+Buf 1st) for Seth Jones?
Even though you bring it Laughton, I don’t really see this as a much better team, and trading away our first this year seems pretty silly if this is all you’re doing.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 12 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,391
Mentions "j'aime": 1,781
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


But you only get 3 retention slots per year. So that ties up a valuable slot for a LONG time. Without retention it is fine.
Hawksguy81, JK74, Shibbal18 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 12 h 57
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,659
Mentions "j'aime": 12,088
Quoting: Shibbal18
It's less than a minimum contract lol


It's not the amount. It's tying up a retention slot for the next six seasons. Remove the retention and Hawks definitely consider it. Insist on the retention and I'm not so sure.
Shibbal18 et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 13 h 3
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,942
Mentions "j'aime": 2,590
I don't like Midds as a fit for the Avs(as you know), but this isnt a bad C.T.A. Not a bad idear. I think the Sabres can get something that helps them more though
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 17 h 7
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 846
Mentions "j'aime": 757
Seems like I’m the only hawks fan that would take this deal. Why are you guys so worried about 1 retention slot? You can still make trades without retention. They’ll reach the point where they intend to sign guys long term and to compete for the playoffs rather than signing guys to trade. They’ll be like most other teams in a few years and not even use all their slots. And even if they do, this return is better than retaining on players like Domi for a 2nd round pick. Ostlund and Buffalo’s first is pretty sweet if you ask me. Would be nice if Colorado’s first was a different year. That is my only complaint and it’s not even a bad one.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
12 janv. à 19 h 34
#20
Démarrer sujet
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,608
Mentions "j'aime": 9,207
Quoting: sabresparaavida
So essentially this is: trade the player who’s been our best forward this year and 2 firsts (Ostlund+Buf 1st) for Seth Jones?
Even though you bring it Laughton, I don’t really see this as a much better team, and trading away our first this year seems pretty silly if this is all you’re doing.


Seth Jones defense numbers are improving, this year they are respectable and when weighted against his teammates they're fantastic. He's the exact type of defender the Sabres need in their top for and had the offensive pedigree that would probably return next to Dahlin. The Sabres with live without Mittelstadt, they still have Savoie, who is now not being blocked
12 janv. à 19 h 38
#21
Démarrer sujet
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,608
Mentions "j'aime": 9,207
Quoting: Garak
For 6 years though. And what if he goes downhill like OEL, and BUF buys him out or something? CHI would then be stuck with a smaller cost, but the buyout penalty would extend the use of our retention slot by double the remaining term. Like how AZ is stuck with OEL's retention slot for a billion years after VAN bought him out. Plus, the dollars added up is A LOT of money to retain. Idk. Maybe Hawks brass would be open to it. But that is a lot of salary. Then again, that is a pretty darn good offer that would essentially recoup most of the assets we spent on Jones in the first place.

What's going on anyway? Is BUF feeling less comfortable with Dahlin on the right side now? I thought I remembered people saying he was "better" on his off side.


They have 3 LHD in their top 4 and not much physical presence. Dahlin is fine on the right, If Samuelsson is with Dahlin, Dahlin is on the right and Power would be back to the left
Garak et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage