SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Still selling at TDL but some light purchases too

Créé par: GiggywithGibby
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 13 nov. 2023
Publié: 13 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Peeke, Andrew
Détails additionnels:
Peeke looked HORRID when he had to play up on top pair last season, but 2nd pairing with a partner who isn't a complete defensive liability I think he'd handle things fine.

I specifically like his skating ability, I think it meshes well in Cronin's system.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
*last 3rd Anaheim owns this draft.
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Florida is dinged up defensively and running short on right shot Dmen, could be a good pickup with time before the TDL. Seems like a logical match, but could be almost anyone. I know tons of leafs fans have been trading for him but every time I make a trade with Leafs fans they get hopping mad about something.
FLA
  1. Lyubushkin, Ilya (1 375 000 $ retained)
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Backup goalie already cleared on waivers, now that we know Franky is shut down for the season, Colorado could look for some extra safety net. Stalock lost the backup role due to Dostal's excellent play, but they guy has shown spurts of excellent play, including last year in Chicago. Cheap insurance to take a flier on.
4.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Carrick, Sam
Détails additionnels:
Sam's having a hell of a season for a 4th line grinder, seems exactly like the type of player Tampa usually goes and acquires, and being on a cheap deal helps them stay cap compliant.
5.
ANA
  1. Wahlstrom, Oliver
Détails additionnels:
Intriguing prospect, but very clearly seems to need a change of scenery. Not scoring in NYI, getting benches, and playing bottom 6 minutes when he does get ice time. Seems to have been jumped by Holmstrom in the lineup.

Could be an intriguing rehab project for Anaheim, Walhatrom could respond well to Cronin's teachings and system.
NYI
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 912 500 $ retained)
  2. Nesterenko, Nikita
Détails additionnels:
Anaheim doesn't have realistic cup hopes this year, might make the playoffs and make some noise, but the emphasis is still building on the future, so I think valuable UFAs still get moved. The Islanders notoriously need scoring and Rico seems like a Lou type of player. Can take some short term cap back if needed to balance the books.

Nesterenko is a NY native and an intriguing prospect, gives some youth with NHL potential back to the Islanders for letting Wahlstrom go.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $72 756 625 $0 $7 225 000 $10 743 375 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
874 125 $874 125 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 nov. 2023 à 19 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,484
Mentions "j'aime": 11,866
I think I’d want to see Helleson with Minty over Peeke
Salzy et LosPatos a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2023 à 19 h 30
#2
Démarrer sujet
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,919
Mentions "j'aime": 6,708
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I think I’d want to see Helleson with Minty over Peeke


I'd rather let Helleson over marinate in the AHL until the 25-26 season when he loses waivers and then work him into a 3 way rotation with Gudas and Peeke for RD2, RD3, and 7D his first year, then take over from Gudas at the end of Radkos contract. I already don't like how green our blue line is, I wouldn't make that problem any worse by rushing rookies.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2023 à 19 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,066
Mentions "j'aime": 1,733
Columbus says yes to that, no problem
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2023 à 19 h 56
#4
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 379
Mentions "j'aime": 290
I personally think Peeke is worth a 3rd right now so I can agree to that assessment but that's just me.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2023 à 22 h 0
#5
Démarrer sujet
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,919
Mentions "j'aime": 6,708
14 nov. 2023 à 0 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,598
Mentions "j'aime": 4,579
Now we know Frankie is done I can see the Avs looking for a cheap insurance goalie so it's not impossible.
14 nov. 2023 à 11 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,141
Mentions "j'aime": 5,947
Pretty conservative but thats probably for the best, nothing to pick at or complain about in my eyes

Although I do agree with @GeneralLandro in saying I would rather see Helleson/other youngsters we have over a guy like Peeke
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2023 à 14 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 71
If Pat doesnt want to spend any assets to bring in a proven top 4 RHD, then I think Peeke is the best alternative, especially at that price. I just think the Ducks 100% need to bring in a defensively sound RHD. Helleson could maybe slot in, but I just havent heard anything about him yet that makes me confident in giving him a look in a season where we actually want to win. I would rather be too deep at D because both of those contracts will almost certainly carry value and never cost anything to offload if needed. Liking the Wahlstrom trade too, although I will admit I have no idea what his value is. But if we can get a young, big-bodied shooter in the top 9 at the price of an expiring contract and a B level prospect, I send that everyday. Only deal I would maybe not do is the Stalock one, I think having him be the veteran third option is necessary because who do we have after him, Clang? But its a third string Tendy trade so it isnt too consequential. We could easily pick up another veteran guy to play in San Diego. Love the line combos too, this would be a fun team to watch.
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2023 à 16 h 20
#9
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,348
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Salzy OldNYIfan LosPatos thoughts?


Everyone else is pretty much summing up what I think haha.

I wouldn’t be opposed to make a “splash” this deadline
14 nov. 2023 à 16 h 54
#10
Démarrer sujet
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,919
Mentions "j'aime": 6,708
Quoting: LosPatos
Everyone else is pretty much summing up what I think haha.

I wouldn’t be opposed to make a “splash” this deadline


I think if we make the post season this season we are playing with house money, there's a lot of teams in our conference that we're expected to be much better, not sure if any of them will clean their act up.

Only real thing we "need" is a true #1RHD, who could we go get?
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
14 nov. 2023 à 16 h 58
#11
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,192
Mentions "j'aime": 4,334
I like both Columbus and NYI deals, but I just don't know enough about the other teams situations to judge them.

Henrique was drafted by Lou, so you're 100% right he's a Lou player.
Lactic_Flaccid a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2023 à 14 h 56
#12
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,348
Mentions "j'aime": 1,873
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I think if we make the post season this season we are playing with house money, there's a lot of teams in our conference that we're expected to be much better, not sure if any of them will clean their act up.

Only real thing we "need" is a true #1RHD, who could we go get?


Rasmus Andersson is a true 1 RHD. But that’ll be a hefty cost that I don’t think the Ducks should inquire
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage