SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lindholm trade - let the rebuild begin

Créé par: MoxNix
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 31 oct. 2023
Publié: 31 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CGY
  1. Lohrei, Mason
  2. Poitras, Matthew
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $75 483 333 $0 $1 142 500 $8 016 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 oct. 2023 à 8 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Definite no from Boston. Maybe something along the lines of Lysell + 1st + 2nd as a starting point.
BruinsWoahWoah et Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 8 h 57
#2
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,555
Mentions "j'aime": 568
I'd love that return if I was Calgary but, Boston giving up it's most NHL ready and arguably best forward and defense prospects is asking a lot.
I'd say 1 of the 2 and maybe a different prospect, probably not both
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 8 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 556
Mentions "j'aime": 186
Yeah absolutely not
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 867
Mentions "j'aime": 385
Yeah thats a massive overpay - more likely Lysell, a first, and a non-core roster player.
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,898
Mentions "j'aime": 8,882
Lol. No. McDavid maybe. Not Lindholm.

1st/Lysell/2nd is roughly the value. Boston would have to include some cap going back, if that cap has value the package gets lighter.
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Bruh
Kinger25 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 10
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 2,981
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Yeah Boston definitely says no to that
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,107
Mentions "j'aime": 1,287
I do believe there is a trade for either Hertl or Lindholm, but I am pretty comfortable that it doesn’t include Poitras. They’ll take the chance that a player hits free agency before making that deal
BruinsWoahWoah a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: Celtics21
I do believe there is a trade for either Hertl or Lindholm, but I am pretty comfortable that it doesn’t include Poitras. They’ll take the chance that a player hits free agency before making that deal


Hard pass on Hertl. At best he is fairly paid, and within a few years he will likely be overpaid. Plus that contract has another 6 years after this one.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 29
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,107
Mentions "j'aime": 1,287
Quoting: hairyberry
Hard pass on Hertl. At best he is fairly paid, and within a few years he will likely be overpaid. Plus that contract has another 6 years after this one.


You do realize Lindholm is signing an 8 year contract when he’s 29. Hertl’s contract at his age is one of the appealing aspects of acquiring him.

There is part of me that would rather have him than Lindholm when I weigh price to acquire and contract even though I acknowledge Lindholm is the better player

If you were talking about Logan Couture, I agree 100 percent that his contract is not one that I want at all
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 30
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: Celtics21
You do realize Lindholm is singing an 8 year contract when he’s 29. Hertl’s contract at his age is one of the appealing aspects of acquiring him.


Yeah I also think Lindholm would probably be a bad idea, I just didn't include him because we don't know for sure what his next contract will be.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 33
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,107
Mentions "j'aime": 1,287
Quoting: hairyberry
Yeah I also think Lindholm would probably be a bad idea, I just didn't include him because we don't know for sure what his next contract will be.


We know we’d have to pay for him to exit free agency. I think it’s safe to say that it exceeds Bo Hovart’s considering there is cash available at the end of this free agent class
hairyberry a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 9 h 39
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 459
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: Celtics21
We know we’d have to pay for him to exit free agency. I think it’s safe to say that it exceeds Bo Hovart’s considering there is cash available at the end of this free agent class


Agreed. Personally I'd like to see what we have in Poitras with a stop-gap 2-3 year option (e.g. Stamkos would be a great target if possible) rather than committing to a full 7 years or so with Lindholm or Hertl
31 oct. 2023 à 10 h 33
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
2021-22 Elias Lindholm wouldn't even get this kind of package.
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 10
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,107
Mentions "j'aime": 1,287
Modifié 31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 16
Quoting: yycofred
2021-22 Elias Lindholm wouldn't even get this kind of package.


If Lindholm were 24 and signing, he would warrant a package like this. Hes not. My guess is the package would be centered around Lysell, DeBrusk, and a #1. If that isn’t enough, then we move on with our 8-0-1 team
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 22
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 667
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol. No. McDavid maybe. Not Lindholm.

1st/Lysell/2nd is roughly the value. Boston would have to include some cap going back, if that cap has value the package gets lighter.


You are definitely not getting that without a guaranteed extension for Lindholm. That's too much for a rental. Some of that would need to be conditional on him resigning probably the 1st.
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 22
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,311
Quoting: Celtics21
If Lindholm were 24 and signing, he would warrant a package like this. Hes not. My guess is the package would be centered around Lysell, DeBrusk, and a #1. If that isn’t enough, then we move on with our 8-0-1 team


That's not getting Lindholm. A smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st doesn't cut it.
Traptor a aimé ceci.
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 26
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,898
Mentions "j'aime": 8,882
Quoting: MoxNix
That's not getting Lindholm. An smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st isn't close.


Lindholm is a pending UFA. Lol. So if that devalues Debrusk it does the same for Elias.

If Debrusk is in the package you don’t get both the 1st and Lysell. Lol.
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 29
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,311
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lindholm is a pending UFA. Lol. So if that devalues Debrusk it does the same for Elias.

If Debrusk is in the package you don’t get both the 1st and Lysell. Lol.


Give your head a shake. Lindholm would certainly extend in Boston, Debrusk wouldn't extend in Calgary with the way things are there now especially not if they trade their 1st line center away and don't even get a half decent young center like Poitras to replace him.

Besides the very last thing Calgary needs or wants is yet another left shot winger especially not a mediocre 27 year old who'd just be blocking the young left shot wingers we already have too many of.
31 oct. 2023 à 11 h 37
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,898
Mentions "j'aime": 8,882
Quoting: MoxNix
Give your head a shake. Lindholm would certainly extend in Boston, Debrusk wouldn't extend in Calgary with the way things are there now especially not if they trade their 1st line center away and don't even get a half decent young center like Poitras to replace him.

Besides the very last thing Calgary needs or wants is yet another left shot winger especially not a mediocre 27 year old who'd just be blocking the young left shot wingers we already have too many of.


Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.
31 oct. 2023 à 12 h 53
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 634
Mentions "j'aime": 163
Quoting: Gofnut999
Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.


Flames have 0 need for debrusk with the direction they're going given his age and contract status. Lysell is also not a very interesting prospect for the flames for lindholm. A late 1st 2025 1st is also not that enticing. There will be alot of demand for Lindholm.

Lindholm would cost poitras + 2025 1st minimum
31 oct. 2023 à 13 h 59
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,107
Mentions "j'aime": 1,287
Quoting: MoxNix
That's not getting Lindholm. A smaller prospect winger with questionable effort, a pending UFA winger and a very late 1st doesn't cut it.


Whether Calgary fans like it or not, any team that trades for Lindholm is going to pay in excess of 9 million through age 37 to keep him. Do teams put the negative value associated with the backend of that deal in an offer or do they value him only for this year?

If Calgary thought he was worth that or he was willing to sign on in Calgary, he’d already be signed to a deal. There is a gap there somewhere. The best way to maximize return is to Remove uncertainty.

On a side note, Lysell is about the same size as Coronato and didn’t have the benefit of playing in Hockey East last year. Pretty comparable skill sets overall. Lysell has some warts or he’d be up with the big club, but talent wise … he also has some elite skills. Minimize him all you want. I doubt you are getting a better prospect in return coupled with a first round pick for Lindholm.
31 oct. 2023 à 14 h 28
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,887
Mentions "j'aime": 3,311
Quoting: Gofnut999
Team needs and player values are two different things entirely.

You may not want or need Debrusk. But as iI said, if he’s in the package you are accepting him at his value. Which means you don’t get both !st and Lysell with him, only one of those pieces. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Not wanting him in the package is a different conversation.


Either you pay the price or you don't get Lindholm. Low ball offers won't get you either of the two best Bergeron replacements you could find in the entire league (Barkov being the other).
31 oct. 2023 à 19 h 10
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,898
Mentions "j'aime": 8,882
Modifié 31 oct. 2023 à 19 h 17
Quoting: Traptor
Flames have 0 need for debrusk with the direction they're going given his age and contract status. Lysell is also not a very interesting prospect for the flames for lindholm. A late 1st 2025 1st is also not that enticing. There will be alot of demand for Lindholm.

Lindholm would cost poitras + 2025 1st minimum


Lol. Boston does not trade Poitras for Lindholm straight up.

The fact that Poitras has arrived early means the need for another center is not as urgent.

As far as the 1st goes, you are not getting a top 15 pick. Buyers at the deadline all pick in the bottom half of the draft.


I agree they should not be interested in Debrusk. But that was never the point.
31 oct. 2023 à 19 h 15
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,898
Mentions "j'aime": 8,882
Quoting: MoxNix
Either you pay the price or you don't get Lindholm. Low ball offers won't get you either of the two best Bergeron replacements you could find in the entire league (Barkov being the other).



Keep him 🤷🏻‍♂️

Boston not paying double his market value and with the arrival Poitras the need is nowhere near what it was a month ago.

If goes free agent and they still want him they will make an offer.

If they go a trade route they are not making a move that does not make sense for Boston.

Lindholm’s value is 1st/young roster player or prospect/and 2nd or 3rd depending on who that 2nd piece is. He’s put up 3 years of first line production in 10 years. Not exactly sure fire top tier player.

He’d fit well in Boston but they are not desperate…anymore.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage