Modifié 6 sept. 2023 à 14 h 9
Quoting: xercuses
Buch is overall better than Nylander, quit being bias
I would rather have Buchnevich on my team from a hockey perspective.
I think this is a case where off-ice details put nylander ahead:
Whoever does acquire nylander will extend.
As a result, they’re buying all of his best years (based on age and historic performance) with minimal tail end risk, depending on the term. They’re going to get 6-8 years of term. You get all of the 27-31 years after the date of the trade.
Buchnevich has 2 years of term, so he cannot be extended. Even if there is a handshake agreement, his next contract will start at age 30. That’s going to be tough. How much term do you give? He will want as much as he can get. Gonna sign him through his 36th or 37th year? Idk, but that’s kind of the decision. This is all decided for the gms. There are charts that show curves of performance and curves of salary.
I feel those 2 different contract situations make nylander the more valuable asset, even if not the better hockey player, and even if one thought Buchnevich or nylander were better, it is not substantial difference, in my opinion they’re both in the bottom half of the top 10 at their position league-wide and both will be able to keep that spot or improve on it the next 2-4 years.