SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

St Louis Fans question

Créé par: Pikey_777
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 14 août 2023
Publié: 19 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What is the gap between Hanifin and Parayko? A 1st or a 2nd?
Hanifin moves south which is his rumoured preference, and also is young enough to be part of the core. Parayko comes home to Alberta to close out his career.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Parayko, Colton (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
STL
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (CGY)
2.
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $75 275 833 $0 $1 700 000 $8 224 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 août 2023 à 9 h 19
#1
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 7,728
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Take the 3rd off before they consider that trade
19 août 2023 à 9 h 53
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,544
Mentions "j'aime": 22,687
That is brutal for CBJ. In effect two first rounders for one year of Lindholm.
19 août 2023 à 10 h 12
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 203
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Why would Calgary add that much to take on Parayko ?

Hanifin is worth more even with an expiring deal as he is younger, produces more and is better defensively.
19 août 2023 à 10 h 35
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: palhal
That is brutal for CBJ. In effect two first rounders for one year of Lindholm.


The trade would be assuming more than 1 year of Lidholm, but that would be up to Jarmo
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
19 août 2023 à 10 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Flames1217
Why would Calgary add that much to take on Parayko ?

Hanifin is worth more even with an expiring deal as he is younger, produces more and is better defensively.


Ok fair enough, in my mind I felt like their age, value, and production was almost a wash. I hate getting accused of being so lopsided for my team. If it’s a second to get the 1 mil retention. Yes please.
My reasoning for the trade idea is:
Weegar - Anderson
Zad - Parayko
Kyl - Tanev
19 août 2023 à 10 h 45
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,031
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
The only the blues would want to trade for Hanafin would be to pair him with Parayko. Trading Parayko defeats the whole purpose of getting Hanafin.
mokumboi et xercuses a aimé ceci.
19 août 2023 à 10 h 48
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Tennisman142
The only the blues would want to trade for Hanafin would be to pair him with Parayko. Trading Parayko defeats the whole purpose of getting Hanafin.

We’ll that’s a fair point, less than helpful for my question though, lol
19 août 2023 à 11 h 18
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,755
Mentions "j'aime": 1,403
Trading Parayko for Hanifin makes no sense.

Also, the question becomes what does the value look like when you factor in Hanifin at 7.5-8m for 8 years? I get it’s easy to assume Parayko isn’t very good without looking into usage, but I would be happy if they signed the rest of his contract on a left handed clone of himself today.

Blues need to add a LD like Hanifin to play with Parayko if they’re insistent on sheltering every other defenseman within the system.
mokumboi et xercuses a aimé ceci.
19 août 2023 à 11 h 23
#9
First round bust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 324
I think that gives the Flames too many RD(Weegar, Andersson, Tanev, Parayko). Unless the plan is to trade Tanev at the TD, it doesn't make much sense.
19 août 2023 à 11 h 45
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Bast
I think that gives the Flames too many RD(Weegar, Andersson, Tanev, Parayko). Unless the plan is to trade Tanev at the TD, it doesn't make much sense.


You may be correct, but Weegar typically has played on the left. In Florida he played on the left side of Ekblad, and think him and Andy could form a very formidable top pairing.
Tanev needs to be bumped down to the third pairing so that his body doesn’t have to deal with the rigours of 20 + min a night. That’s why I had Parayko slotted beside big Z. It also gives Zad a little more flexibility to rush the puck. Just my thoughts.
19 août 2023 à 11 h 55
#11
First round bust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: Pikey_777
You may be correct, but Weegar typically has played on the left. In Florida he played on the left side of Ekblad, and think him and Andy could form a very formidable top pairing.
Tanev needs to be bumped down to the third pairing so that his body doesn’t have to deal with the rigours of 20 + min a night. That’s why I had Parayko slotted beside big Z. It also gives Zad a little more flexibility to rush the puck. Just my thoughts.


IMO Tanev is still a top 4D. He doesn't need reduced ice time. I believe the reason he missed so many games was that his shoulder wasn't back to 100% after the surgery in the last off season. I think another off season would do wonders for his recovery. He had a couple of full seasons before the injury in the playoffs against Dallas.
19 août 2023 à 11 h 56
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,272
Mentions "j'aime": 11,350
Quoting: Pikey_777
We’ll that’s a fair point, less than helpful for my question though, lol


Your question has no bearing on reality, as the Blues are not trading Parayko. And they are certainly not retaining 8x1M on him for peanuts just to get a UFA. As noted above, this trade concept makes zero sense for the Blues.
19 août 2023 à 12 h 6
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,544
Mentions "j'aime": 22,687
Quoting: Pikey_777
The trade would be assuming more than 1 year of Lidholm, but that would be up to Jarmo


Guess you don't understand the definition of UFA., if you think it would be up to Jarmo. Interesting that the Flames signed Markstrom, Colemen, Tanev, Kadri as UFAs but didn't give up any assets to acquire them. But somehow feel entitled that a non playoff team is would be give up two firsts for a a maybe signing of a UFA. CBJ will just wait like just about all teams do for their UFASs.
19 août 2023 à 14 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,047
Mentions "j'aime": 1,712
Quoting: Pikey_777
The trade would be assuming more than 1 year of Lidholm, but that would be up to Jarmo


Quoting: palhal
But somehow feel entitled that a non playoff team is would be give up two firsts for a a maybe signing of a UFA. CBJ will just wait like just about all teams do for their UFASs.


Any Lindholm to CBJ trade would have to include an extension, there's too many variables this season to place a solid bet on Columbus being a playoff team. Even with Lindholm, I doubt we are, so we'd be acquiring him for next year and beyond.

If there's a reasonable extension in place (probably sub-$8M), something like this might work for CBJ. But I could also very easily see Jarmo waiting until UFA to get Lindhom if he thinks that's an option, or pull something like Severson's trade to get his guy for cheap after the season, without giving up these significant future assets.

In the end, I think Calgary finds a way to re-sign Lindholm, or would be best off just trading him to the highest bidder at the deadline.
palhal a aimé ceci.
19 août 2023 à 14 h 52
#15
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,544
Mentions "j'aime": 22,687
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Any Lindholm to CBJ trade would have to include an extension, there's too many variables this season to place a solid bet on Columbus being a playoff team. Even with Lindholm, I doubt we are, so we'd be acquiring him for next year and beyond.

If there's a reasonable extension in place (probably sub-$8M), something like this might work for CBJ. But I could also very easily see Jarmo waiting until UFA to get Lindhom if he thinks that's an option, or pull something like Severson's trade to get his guy for cheap after the season, without giving up these significant future assets.

In the end, I think Calgary finds a way to re-sign Lindholm, or would be best off just trading him to the highest bidder at the deadline.


With so many teams at the cap, trading at the TDL might be only way deals get done...... I know the Flames like Lindholm but geez he will almsot 30 when his next contract will start. I guess some team will overpay in term for him. Flames missed the playoffs last season, I really don't see all the love for their players or why they should resign them. Hanifan, Lindholm, Backlund, Zadorov...all UFAs
I'm a believer that non playoff team should be trading their UFAs at TDL. There should lots available this TDL.
The Leafs have I believe 8 upcoming UFAs. Now I don't expect the Leafs to be trading any of them for their playoff push, but it makes an interesting off season with Leafs potentially losing, one third of their current team and have about 45m in cap to fill out the roster. We'll just have to wait to see if Matthews and Nylander are part the Leafs for the second half this decade.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
19 août 2023 à 19 h 28
#16
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
Well you won’t get retention I’ll tell you that much

Also the whole point of getting a guy like hanifin would be to play with Parayko. And I don’t think the gap in skill between hanafin and Parakyo is big hanafin is expiring and without a guarantee of contract I doubt the blues will risk it. Also we have Krug and Leddy so Getting hanifin at this stage wouldn’t be smart especially for Parayko
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage