SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool

Créé par: fangm
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 20 juill. 2023
Publié: 20 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Larsson, Adam
  2. Wright, Shane
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
2.
TOR
  1. Karlsson, Erik (3 000 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
3.
TOR
  1. Dostal, Lukas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
ANA
  1. Samsonov, Ilya [Droits de RFA]
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $81 650 116 $0 $0 $1 849 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
918 333 $918 333 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juill. 2023 à 12 h 49
#1
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense
Fabi a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 12 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,775
Mentions "j'aime": 1,257
Woeful, but I think you already knew that but posted this drivel anyway 👏
20 juill. 2023 à 13 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,931
Mentions "j'aime": 12,268
Hard pass for Anaheim who just shave Dostal that contract

We have a goalie that could be moved but it isn’t Dostal and the guy who it is has already said no to Toronto so
Jded a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 13 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,373
Mentions "j'aime": 9,527
Canucks aren’t trading a 2nd for a 4th liner and a #6/7 dman
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 13 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,373
Mentions "j'aime": 9,527
Quoting: RipNasty
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense


In what world is Liljegren, Robertson, a 1st, and a 3rd a better return than Wright, Larsson, and a 1st?

Seattle’s 1st is likely > Toronto’s 1st
Wright >>> Liljegren, Robertson, and the 3rd
Then Larsson on top of that
Warpbox, matthias893 et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 13 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,153
Mentions "j'aime": 2,248
Quoting: RipNasty
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense


Capfriendly, where Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 13 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 282
Seattle doesn't even pick up. Trade would make them a worse team. Does nothing to improve them. They have plenty of scoring (Outscored Toronto) and Larrson is a key cog on the defense.
Quillanrocks a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 7
#8
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: mv21227
In what world is Liljegren, Robertson, a 1st, and a 3rd a better return than Wright, Larsson, and a 1st?

Seattle’s 1st is likely > Toronto’s 1st
Wright >>> Liljegren, Robertson, and the 3rd
Then Larsson on top of that


Larsson isn't very good and Wright has proven nothing. However, Karlsson at full price is about the riskiest investment one can make. And the return for Marner isn't close.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 7
#9
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Warpbox
Capfriendly, where Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright


He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,373
Mentions "j'aime": 9,527
Quoting: RipNasty
Larsson isn't very good and Wright has proven nothing. However, Karlsson at full price is about the riskiest investment one can make. And the return for Marner isn't close.


Larsson is a good top 4 dman. He’d be the Leafs best RHD (unless they get Karlsson), and arguably their best dman overall. Wright is one of the best prospects in hockey. He alone is probably worth more than the package the Leafs are giving up for Karlsson here. When you add in Larsson and the 1st it’s easily a far better package than what the Leafs are giving to SJ. And the Leafs aren’t trading for Karlsson full price, there’s 3M retention (he is still a risky investment though I agree)
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 33
#11
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: RipNasty
He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good


Bedard hasn't proven anything. Clearly Nicholas Robertson >>>>
Warpbox et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 49
#12
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: mv21227
Larsson is a good top 4 dman. He’d be the Leafs best RHD (unless they get Karlsson), and arguably their best dman overall. Wright is one of the best prospects in hockey. He alone is probably worth more than the package the Leafs are giving up for Karlsson here. When you add in Larsson and the 1st it’s easily a far better package than what the Leafs are giving to SJ. And the Leafs aren’t trading for Karlsson full price, there’s 3M retention (he is still a risky investment though I agree)


No he wouldn't be, Brodie is better. Larsson isn't all that good. He never has the puck which is why he hits a lot and blocks a lot of shots but absolutely kills you possession wise. He's not bad to have on your team but he's really not what he's billed as.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 50
#13
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Juiceman
Bedard hasn't proven anything. Clearly Nicholas Robertson >>>>


Wright dropped from 1st overall for a reason and couldn't make the squad yet. He's overrated and absolutely could fizzle out.
20 juill. 2023 à 14 h 58
#14
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright dropped from 1st overall for a reason and couldn't make the squad yet. He's overrated and absolutely could fizzle out.


Every single prospect has potential to fizzle out. 4th overall is still no joke. And just because he couldn't stick in the NHL in the first year, he is suddenly overrated? Literally nobody from his draft class has played in the NHL yet. The only one is Slafkovsky who was terrible. Go tell Habs fans that their recent 1st overall pick is overrated and absolutely could fizzle out
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 15 h 16
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,153
Mentions "j'aime": 2,248
Quoting: RipNasty
He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good


He was drafted 4th a singular year ago. Did you say the same thing about Marner when he didn't immediately join the NHL?
Juiceman et vikhodush a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2023 à 15 h 54
#16
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Juiceman
Every single prospect has potential to fizzle out. 4th overall is still no joke. And just because he couldn't stick in the NHL in the first year, he is suddenly overrated? Literally nobody from his draft class has played in the NHL yet. The only one is Slafkovsky who was terrible. Go tell Habs fans that their recent 1st overall pick is overrated and absolutely could fizzle out


It was a very weak class.
20 juill. 2023 à 15 h 55
#17
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Warpbox
He was drafted 4th a singular year ago. Did you say the same thing about Marner when he didn't immediately join the NHL?


Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.
20 juill. 2023 à 16 h 23
#18
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: RipNasty
It was a very weak class.


Right but that doesn't matter. Saying he is overrated and could fizzle out because he didn't immediately make the NHL makes no sense. Most top players in the NHL took 1 or 2 years after their draft to make the NHL... What is your justification for saying this? It is a terrible argument.
20 juill. 2023 à 16 h 24
#19
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.


You're right. I'd imagine the 4th overall in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade would surely be able to make an immediate impact the year he was drafted. Wait...
20 juill. 2023 à 16 h 44
#20
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 4,188
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Marner isn't going anywhere. Bruce Boudreau when talking about the leafs and the big4 said Marner is the best player of them all. This guy is one of the top 3 RW in the league and possibly the best 2-way winger in the league. This kind of skill is hard to find, Marchand would be the last guy to be in that conversation and he has only one 100 point season.
20 juill. 2023 à 17 h 11
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,153
Mentions "j'aime": 2,248
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.


Every 4th overall pick from 2010-2021. Ryan Johansen, Adam Larsson, Griffen Reinhart, Seth Jones, Sam Bennett, Mitch Marner, Jesse Puljurarvi, Cale Makar, Brady Tkachuk, Bowen Byram, Lucas Raymond, Luke Hughes.

Out of those 12 players, there are 2 that are/were less valuable then Liljegren (Reinhart and Puljurarvi) The other 10? All more valuable (at least at their prime) if you think Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright you're insane
20 juill. 2023 à 17 h 59
#22
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Juiceman
Right but that doesn't matter. Saying he is overrated and could fizzle out because he didn't immediately make the NHL makes no sense. Most top players in the NHL took 1 or 2 years after their draft to make the NHL... What is your justification for saying this? It is a terrible argument.


It's the fact that he slid down, in a weak draft class and hasn't overly impressed since. I don't like his attitude either. Wright's not going to be what people think he's going to be.
20 juill. 2023 à 18 h 0
#23
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Warpbox
Every 4th overall pick from 2010-2021. Ryan Johansen, Adam Larsson, Griffen Reinhart, Seth Jones, Sam Bennett, Mitch Marner, Jesse Puljurarvi, Cale Makar, Brady Tkachuk, Bowen Byram, Lucas Raymond, Luke Hughes.

Out of those 12 players, there are 2 that are/were less valuable then Liljegren (Reinhart and Puljurarvi) The other 10? All more valuable (at least at their prime) if you think Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright you're insane


Look we both know you hate the Leafs. So anything you say in regards to Liljegren is going to be just nonsensical.
20 juill. 2023 à 18 h 2
#24
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,935
Mentions "j'aime": 3,166
Quoting: Juiceman
You're right. I'd imagine the 4th overall in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade would surely be able to make an immediate impact the year he was drafted. Wait...


That was a Babcock choice. They didn't even give Marner a chance. But as we have discovered, everything you say is going to A) be heavily bias towards the Canucks B) even more heavily biased against the Leafs and C) you make up nonsense rationalizations to make your arguments make sense. Unfortunately it's always bogus and impossible to discuss.
20 juill. 2023 à 18 h 3
#25
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: RipNasty
It's the fact that he slid down, in a weak draft class and hasn't overly impressed since. I don't like his attitude either. Wright's not going to be what people think he's going to be.


Draft is unpredictable. Yeah sure maybe his attitude is a problem, but that doesn't make him suddenly overrated and destined to fizzle out. The fact that he was consensus ranked #1 tells you enough of how good he is
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage