SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two Trades to Finish Off

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 15 juin 2023
Publié: 15 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Boqvist to Buffalo would be interesting for sure.
Calgary get 4 picks for Lindholm. 3 this year and 1 next. I understand they would want a centre back like Sillinger BUT if they can't get him 4 good picks might be their best option.

Lindholm signs an 8.5m x 8 year contract.

Thoughts?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
2.
CBJ
  1. Lindholm, Elias
Détails additionnels:
extends 8.5 x 8 years
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
top 10 protected
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $77 108 333 $0 $3 550 000 $6 391 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Carlsson, Leo
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 juin 2023 à 3 h 31
#1
THE worst
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 14
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Modifié 15 juin 2023 à 3 h 37
No way Boqvist gets two 2nds with his injury history

That’s a 9 year commitment for Lindholm. You have Johnson at center already and Jarmo doesn’t draft Carlsson if he’s not going to be top6C. Sillinger is still top 6C prospect too. That means Lindholm could easily be a 8.5mil 3C for half those 9 years…. Ouch!

Might as well trade for JT Miller if you want a 8mil 3rd liner in a couple years. Should be much cheaper to acquire and he’s got 1 less year total.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2023 à 4 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
I don't know why Boqvist in Buffalo would be interesting, he's not the type of player we want. Perhaps Andrew Peeke would have made a lot more sense, although I would have preferred a more proven D.
gretzkyghosts, BUFF36, sabres89 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2023 à 6 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
What's Corson Cuelamens cost ?
15 juin 2023 à 7 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,520
Mentions "j'aime": 19,668
Not enough for Lindholm
15 juin 2023 à 7 h 29
#5
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,051
Quoting: Troy_the_Worst
No way Boqvist gets two 2nds with his injury history

That’s a 9 year commitment for Lindholm. You have Johnson at center already and Jarmo doesn’t draft Carlsson if he’s not going to be top6C. Sillinger is still top 6C prospect too. That means Lindholm could easily be a 8.5mil 3C for half those 9 years…. Ouch!

Might as well trade for JT Miller if you want a 8mil 3rd liner in a couple years. Should be much cheaper to acquire and he’s got 1 less year total.


Johnson is unproven at center, though he should get some more time there this year. His playmaking is elite, but I'm not sure he has the size, strength or compete to really thrive there, so he's likely back to the wing.

The jury is very much out on Sillinger being a top-6 center. Personally, I think it's a long shot and he's a 3C at best, and I think it's just as likely that he becomes a bust. While he works hard and has decent skill, his skating and IQ are suspect. If some team still sees him as having top-6 potential, CBJ should trade him. Carlsson and Lindholm would likely be top-6 centers for this team, but I have no interest in signing another 28-year-old to an 8-year extension.
15 juin 2023 à 8 h 7
#6
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,735
May I suggest something? that would benefit both teams.
Mittelstadt for Peeke who ever adds something add it.
sabres89, squashmaple et SK101 a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2023 à 8 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,273
Mentions "j'aime": 6,247
Quoting: AG_sweden
May I suggest something? that would benefit both teams.
Mittelstadt for Peeke who ever adds something add it.


Yes, yes you may. I doubt the Sabres gm would do that, but I would.
AG_sweden a aimé ceci.
15 juin 2023 à 8 h 35
#8
THE worst
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 14
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Hockey_Mind
Johnson is unproven at center, though he should get some more time there this year. His playmaking is elite, but I'm not sure he has the size, strength or compete to really thrive there, so he's likely back to the wing.

The jury is very much out on Sillinger being a top-6 center. Personally, I think it's a long shot and he's a 3C at best, and I think it's just as likely that he becomes a bust. While he works hard and has decent skill, his skating and IQ are suspect. If some team still sees him as having top-6 potential, CBJ should trade him. Carlsson and Lindholm would likely be top-6 centers for this team, but I have no interest in signing another 28-year-old to an 8-year extension.


A. I don’t have KJ at Center (yet), this GM does. Why Lindholm makes even less sense if KJ is already a top 6C.

B. Yes Lindholm would be top6C and #1C this year and top6 for next couple. But when he’s 32-33 and there’s 4-5 years left on his deal is he still a top6C on this team? Unlikely. (What I said above, reworded since it seems we actually agree on this fact but somehow here we are still, lol)

C. I doubt Jarmo has given up on KJ and Sillinger projections yet. It’s fine if you have.
15 juin 2023 à 9 h 8
#9
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,735
Quoting: sabres89
Yes, yes you may. I doubt the Sabres gm would do that, but I would.


I see him as a cost controlled option for Power to play with. Has top 4 shutdown role experience. Has the size too. As for CBJ they get a top 6 option on either C or Lw. maybe they add like a 2nd or something. But to me it is pretty close 😀👍
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage