SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Missing Pieces

Créé par: ronaldhainsey
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 6 févr. 2023
Publié: 6 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hey there, so the Los Angeles Kings are in a bit of a rough spot on D right now and they need to make some moves to try and fix that. Trading Sean Durzi, Alex Turcotte, Sean Walker, a 2023 1st round pick, and a 2024 2nd round pick for Jakob Chychrun and Karel Vejmelka from the Arizona Coyotes could be a good move for them. Chychrun is a solid defenseman who can help shore up the Kings' back end, and Vejmelka is a promising young goaltender who could provide some depth in net.

As for putting Jonathan Quick on LTIR until the playoffs, that could actually be a smart move for the Kings. Quick has been struggling this year and putting him on LTIR would give the team some much-needed salary cap relief, while also allowing Quick to get healthy and hopefully play better in the playoffs. It's not ideal, but in the current situation, it might be the best option for the Kings.
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Durzi, Sean
  2. Turcotte, Alex
  3. Walker, Sean
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
2.
TOR
  1. Allard, Frédéric
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
3.
4.
5.
LAK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
6.
LAK
  1. Johnson, Jack
Détails additionnels:
Waivers
CHI
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYR
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $80 180 000 $637 500 $3 982 500 $2 320 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 725 000 $2 725 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 36
#1
Hockee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,775
Mentions "j'aime": 868
I mean, don't get me wrong, Harvey Pinard is a decent player, but he's just not on the same level as Andersson. Andersson is just an awesome player, and it would be a real shame to see him go. I don't think trading him for Harvey Pinard is a good move for the Kings.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,582
Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
You have to be injured to go on LTIR. Quick is not.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,582
Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
Quoting: deys3232
I mean, don't get me wrong, Harvey Pinard is a decent player, but he's just not on the same level as Andersson. Andersson is just an awesome player, and it would be a real shame to see him go. I don't think trading him for Harvey Pinard is a good move for the Kings.


The Kings put Andersson on waivers earlier this season. If anyone wanted him, they would have claimed him for free back then.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 40
#4
Démarrer sujet
first ballot hof
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: deys3232
I mean, don't get me wrong, Harvey Pinard is a decent player, but he's just not on the same level as Andersson. Andersson is just an awesome player, and it would be a real shame to see him go. I don't think trading him for Harvey Pinard is a good move for the Kings.


I disagree with the statement. While Harvey Pinard may not have the same level of recognition as Andersson, it is unfair to judge his value as a player solely based on reputation or past performance. Every player brings unique skills and attributes to a team, and it is possible that Pinard could bring valuable contributions to the Kings. Additionally, player trades are often motivated by a variety of factors beyond individual performance, such as team dynamics, salary considerations, and long-term strategy. It is important to consider the full context of the situation before making a judgement on the potential trade.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 42
#5
Démarrer sujet
first ballot hof
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: tkecanuck341
The Kings put Andersson on waivers earlier this season. If anyone wanted him, they would have claimed him for free back then.


I disagree with the statement. Just because Andersson was placed on waivers and was not claimed, it does not necessarily mean that he has no value to other teams. Teams often have specific needs and priorities, and a player that goes unclaimed on waivers one time may be in high demand at another point in the season or in the future. For example, the Calgary Flames claimed Oliver Kylington off waivers in January 2021 after he went unclaimed earlier in the season, and he has since become a regular contributor to the team. Therefore, it is possible that the Kings could still receive a valuable return in a trade for Andersson.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 43
#6
Hockee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,775
Mentions "j'aime": 868
Quoting: tkecanuck341
You have to be injured to go on LTIR. Quick is not.


You don't necessarily have to be injured to go on LTIR. Sometimes players with long-term injuries can be placed on the LTIR to free up salary cap space for their team. So just because Quick isn't visibly injured doesn't mean he couldn't be on LTIR.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 43
#7
Hockee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,775
Mentions "j'aime": 868
Quoting: ronaldhainsey
I disagree with the statement. Just because Andersson was placed on waivers and was not claimed, it does not necessarily mean that he has no value to other teams. Teams often have specific needs and priorities, and a player that goes unclaimed on waivers one time may be in high demand at another point in the season or in the future. For example, the Calgary Flames claimed Oliver Kylington off waivers in January 2021 after he went unclaimed earlier in the season, and he has since become a regular contributor to the team. Therefore, it is possible that the Kings could still receive a valuable return in a trade for Andersson.


Why so formal
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,661
Mentions "j'aime": 1,701
Quoting: deys3232
I mean, don't get me wrong, Harvey Pinard is a decent player, but he's just not on the same level as Andersson. Andersson is just an awesome player, and it would be a real shame to see him go. I don't think trading him for Harvey Pinard is a good move for the Kings.


You do realize Anderson is 24 he is a tweener. The main difference is RHP is actually useful in a bottom 6 role
BorisBagel et Billy739 a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 50
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,538
All this chat about Lias Anderson and somehow it’s positive talk about him?! This can’t be real? leafs fans converted to kings fans? SHL middle 6 guy has a lot of hype here
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 19 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: deys3232
You don't necessarily have to be injured to go on LTIR. Sometimes players with long-term injuries can be placed on the LTIR to free up salary cap space for their team. So just because Quick isn't visibly injured doesn't mean he couldn't be on LTIR.


False. The league does regular checks and medical testing on players moved to LTIR, especially those moved there indefinitely.
Billy739, NYR1983 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 20 h 1
#11
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Andersson is an absolute bust no way mtl does that
BorisBagel, Billy739 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2023 à 20 h 9
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,582
Mentions "j'aime": 6,156
Quoting: deys3232
You don't necessarily have to be injured to go on LTIR. Sometimes players with long-term injuries can be placed on the LTIR to free up salary cap space for their team. So just because Quick isn't visibly injured doesn't mean he couldn't be on LTIR.


You contradicted yourself in consecutive sentences.
6 févr. 2023 à 20 h 58
#13
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: deys3232
I mean, don't get me wrong, Harvey Pinard is a decent player, but he's just not on the same level as Andersson. Andersson is just an awesome player, and it would be a real shame to see him go. I don't think trading him for Harvey Pinard is a good move for the Kings.


MTL isnt trading RHP as outside Dach he's the only one able to breathe life into Suzuki's line without Caufield there.
While he's amazing on 4th line with a mutli goal game then a real stinker in a shutout where he was one of the only one with quality chances.
This earned him the call to top line where he scored 2 goals and provided Suzuki and Anderson a spark for Suzuki's first multi point night since Caufield went on LTIR.
For Anderson it was just the 2nd time this season he had a multi point night after RNH joined them and it snapped a 3 game pointless streak Suzuki/Anderson had going .

When Caufield went down and both became Ghosts
Caufield went down and RHP scored his 1st goal of the season
While others cant seem to step up he's consistently doing so.
To be fair though due to injuries Suzuki lost first Dach when Center Injuries forced him of wing back to Center.
Then he lost Caufield about 10 games after that and is has 1 goal 6 points in 19 games up until RNH joined him .

Plus you dont trade the guy nicknamed "Laval-agher "
He plays just as hard with the same shot in the same package at 5'9 183lbs playing like he's 6'9 240lbs
Plus Lias Anderson doesnt even beat out Teasdale or Condotta for 3rd line Winger in Lavals deep system with skilled Goal Scorer's and Garbage Goal Scorer's in bulk.
We need Playmakers like Turcotte who's on a 3 year decline after mistakenly leaving NCAA after a season and entering into a system to deep to coddle him but instead pushed him from center to wing hurting his overall value and stunting his development.
6 févr. 2023 à 21 h 20
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,525
Mentions "j'aime": 25,401
Lias Andersson is as worthless as Joey Anderson, and there's no need to acquire a winger from outside the organization, so all the talk about RHP's qualities is moot.

Trading one LhD (Moverare) for another (Hajek) seems unnecessary, if not pointless.

Since we're not acquiring RHP, there's no need to ship Grundstrom out.

Your main trade doesn't seem exceptional. That may be exactly what an eventual Chychrun/Vejmelka trade looks like. Personally, I'd like to leave Durzi and Vejmelka out, but that's pure bias on my part. (I love Sean Durzi.)
ronaldhainsey a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage