SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying to come up with an even remotely feasible Karlsson trade

Créé par: Fogz144
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 3 déc. 2022
Publié: 3 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Karlsson, Erik (5 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Let me know what you think. On the one hand Karlsson is playing great but on the other he's 32 with 5 years left. This squeezes the Sens pretty hard against the Cap if they want to resign both DeBrincat (duh) and Zub (imo a must-sign). Obviously the big piece here is Batherson, who the Sens would hate to lose - it'd create a huge hole in their left-wing depth. The only reason the Sens would even trade for Karlsson would be to (hopefully) cement the top end of their D-corps for the future, but frankly I think they're better off trying to find another version of the John Marino trade (which they should have pulled the trigger on).
SJS
  1. Batherson, Drake
  2. Bernard-Docker, Jacob
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $76 644 881 $0 $4 025 000 $5 855 119 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
821 667 $821 667 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 déc. 2022 à 17 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 11
**Comment under the trade should have said right-wing depth**
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 2
#2
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
um I don't think this is quite enough for the sharks to retain like 30 million
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 3
#3
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
San Jose and EK65 both decline.

Try again.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 5
#4
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
There is no scenario where Grier retains nearly 30million. That simply does not and will not happen.

That said the offer is pretty decent if you add a 1st
Fogz144 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 81
I think trading Batherson for a top 4 Dman can make a lot of sense, but they need to get someone of a similar age as the rest of the team. Ideally no older than 27/28. Love Karl, but unless they were getting him for relatively cheap cost to acquire, I think the age and term make it hard to work, and I think his resurgence killed that kind of deal.

San Jose has no reason to sell low on him and it's not in Ottawa's interest to buy high on him.
Fogz144 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 5
#6
Respect Mike Grier
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,155
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
I dont think the Sharks retain more than 3 mil in any trade. Nearly 6 mill is just too much with that term. If a team wants more Salary retained there will have to be a 3rd team.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,179
Mentions "j'aime": 3,658
I see San Jose retaining $2.5 mil a year but not almost $6 mil. Could have a 2nd team retain some, maybe Arizona takes $1.5 mil to make the cap hit $7.5 mil which is much more reasonable.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 12
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: SandersonTheGOAT

San Jose has no reason to sell low on him and it's not in Ottawa's interest to buy high on him.


This is my feeling too
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 14
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
There is no scenario where Grier retains nearly 30million. That simply does not and will not happen.

That said the offer is pretty decent if you add a 1st


Yeah and if that's the case I don't see a trade working out. I don't think Ottawa is well-served by sending a first with this and they can't take much more than 5.75/year back. If you swap the 2nd for this year's first then everybody will have felt like they lost, which is maybe the only way this kind of trade goes through.
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,537
Mentions "j'aime": 19,678
There is absolutely nothing remotely feasible about nearly 6M retention for 5 years. San Jose would literally be paying him 20M in actual money not not play for them
3 déc. 2022 à 18 h 53
#11
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,249
Mentions "j'aime": 24,096
Quoting: sensonfire
San Jose and EK65 both decline.

Try again.


Karlsson would come back. You’re crazy if you think he wouldn’t
3 déc. 2022 à 19 h 3
#12
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
Quoting: csick
Karlsson would come back. You’re crazy if you think he wouldn’t


1. As a multi-millionaire, he'd probably rather live in the sunny cosmopolitan Silicon Valley of California than in the winter apocalypse of Ottawa, Canada.



2. EK65 is playing 25 minutes a night and scoring more than a point per game in San Jose.

He's San Jose's #1 defenceman and this is his first season not playing second fiddle to Brent Burns.



3. As the former captain of the Ottawa Senators, he would want to come back and be named captain again.

That means somehow taking away the captaincy from Brady Tkachuk.



4. Ottawa is actually lower in the standings than San Jose and San Jose destroyed Ottawa last time.



5. It makes no sense for EK65 to want to be traded to a team that is still run by the same people that ran him out of town 4 years ago.



He ain't coming back.
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2022 à 19 h 6
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,896
Mentions "j'aime": 1,532
no team is going to give up top assets for EK even with 50% retained, just because he is having a good year does not mean he will play like this all year or for the remainder of his contract and Batherson is worth far more then EK
3 déc. 2022 à 19 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
That kind of retention makes it UNFEASIBLE

As much as I'd love Karlsson, I would also not do this trade
3 déc. 2022 à 23 h 46
#15
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: sensonfire
1. As a multi-millionaire, he'd probably rather live in the sunny cosmopolitan Silicon Valley of California than in the winter apocalypse of Ottawa, Canada.



2. EK65 is playing 25 minutes a night and scoring more than a point per game in San Jose.

He's San Jose's #1 defenceman and this is his first season not playing second fiddle to Brent Burns.



3. As the former captain of the Ottawa Senators, he would want to come back and be named captain again.

That means somehow taking away the captaincy from Brady Tkachuk.



4. Ottawa is actually lower in the standings than San Jose and San Jose destroyed Ottawa last time.



5. It makes no sense for EK65 to want to be traded to a team that is still run by the same people that ran him out of town 4 years ago.



He ain't coming back.


You're right. Karlsson has repeated many times this year that he is finally comfortable in San Jose and happy with his role on the team. It took moving Burns to make him THE guy but it's worked out well and Karlsson loves playing for Quinn. Also Grier and Erik have a very good relationship and Karlsson has frequently stated that he likes the direction Grier wants to go in.

Also Karl has a beautiful mansion near San Jose and many close friends on the team now. He is staying in San Jose unless a contender offers an incredible package that doesn't require much retention which is highly unlikely.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage