SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would toronto be interested in a Nyquist and Gavrikov package

Créé par: Bdawwwgy1
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 nov. 2022
Publié: 14 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav
  2. Nyquist, Gustav (2 750 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Hirvonen, Roni
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Rindell, Axel
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
    anywhere for cap space
    3.
    VAN
    1. Ovchinnikov, Dmitry
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $79 142 913 $212 500 $850 000 $3 357 087 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    0 $0 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    840 630 $840 630 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 33
    #1
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,254
    Mentions "j'aime": 636
    At this price, probably. It's a lot better than all the Schenn and Murphy trades.

    But Kuzmenko, healthy scratch on a garbage team, ain't worth close to that.
    Bdawwwgy1 a aimé ceci.
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 42
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 10,187
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    At this price, probably. It's a lot better than all the Schenn and Murphy trades.

    But Kuzmenko, healthy scratch on a garbage team, ain't worth close to that.


    Kuzmenko would be tied for 2nd on your team in goals and your 3rd highest scoring winger, while on a cheap contract. He’s absolutely worth that
    Turkish_Canuck, Saskleaf et Warpbox a aimé ceci.
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 48
    #3
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,254
    Mentions "j'aime": 636
    Quoting: mv21227
    Kuzmenko would be tied for 2nd on your team in goals and your 3rd highest scoring winger, while on a cheap contract. He’s absolutely worth that


    No, clearly not. If he was, he wouldn't be healthy scratch on a 0.281 pts% team
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 49
    #4
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,778
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,815
    Don't CF fans look at roster? Leafs don't need LHD especially at the expense of a RHD. Nqvuist...he isn't THAT special. Geez.
    One horrid trade for the Leafs with that CBJ trade.
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 54
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 10,187
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    No, clearly not. If he was, he wouldn't be healthy scratch on a 0.281 pts% team


    Or he’s still acclimating to hockey in NA and isn’t used to playing this many games this quickly. He’s been great this year and was just in need of a rest

    Out of curiosity what would you say Bunting is worth in a trade? It would have to be far less than Kuzmenko since Kuzmenko is performing far better on a far worse team
    14 nov. 2022 à 17 h 58
    #6
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,254
    Mentions "j'aime": 636
    Quoting: mv21227
    Or he’s still acclimating to hockey in NA and isn’t used to playing this many games this quickly. He’s been great this year and was just in need of a rest

    Out of curiosity what would you say Bunting is worth in a trade? It would have to be far less than Kuzmenko since Kuzmenko is performing far better on a far worse team


    Bunting isnt available, and if he were it'd be for more than kuzmenko. Its not rare that Euro players start hot and cool down. Gusev... Sekac... yeah I'll keep Bunting who is better and better track record.
    14 nov. 2022 à 18 h 0
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 10,187
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    Bunting isnt available, and if he were it'd be for more than kuzmenko. Its not rare that Euro players start hot and cool down. Gusev... Sekac... yeah I'll keep Bunting who is better and better track record.


    Bunting is better, yet is producing way worse while on a much better team and with better linemates? Put Kuzmenko with Matthews and Marner/Nylander and he scores 40 and puts up 80+ points
    14 nov. 2022 à 18 h 0
    #8
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,254
    Mentions "j'aime": 636
    Quoting: mv21227
    Bunting is better, yet is producing way worse while on a much better team and with better linemates? Put Kuzmenko with Matthews and Marner/Nylander and he scores 40 and puts up 80+ points


    Oufff. If Kuzmenko was even remotely close to being that good, the canucks wouldnt be where they are.
    14 nov. 2022 à 18 h 28
    #9
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 17,615
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    Oufff. If Kuzmenko was even remotely close to being that good, the canucks wouldnt be where they are.


    Oh but Kuzmneko is scoring at a 40 goal pace. Your argument of "he was healthy scratched one game, he is worthless" really falls short here. There is 0 support to your argument and you are just another internet troll trying to get a reaction
    Jah1722 et Warpbox a aimé ceci.
    14 nov. 2022 à 18 h 54
    #10
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    Oufff. If Kuzmenko was even remotely close to being that good, the canucks wouldnt be where they are.


    11 points in 15 games but keep spewing the “healthy scratch” argument as the holy grail.
    SK101, Juiceman et Warpbox a aimé ceci.
    14 nov. 2022 à 20 h 2
    #11
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,254
    Mentions "j'aime": 636
    Quoting: Jah1722
    11 points in 15 games but keep spewing the “healthy scratch” argument as the holy grail.


    Quoting: Juiceman
    Oh but Kuzmneko is scoring at a 40 goal pace. Your argument of "he was healthy scratched one game, he is worthless" really falls short here. There is 0 support to your argument and you are just another internet troll trying to get a reaction


    Healthy scratch on the Bruins? Alright that'd pass. But on the Canucks? A sub .300 team ? Yeaaah doesnt inspire confidence, not at that asking price lmao.
    14 nov. 2022 à 20 h 24
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 10,187
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    Healthy scratch on the Bruins? Alright that'd pass. But on the Canucks? A sub .300 team ? Yeaaah doesnt inspire confidence, not at that asking price lmao.


    Yet he’s still producing far better than Bunting. Bunting must be awful if he’s worse than a healthy scratch on a sub .300 team. Must not even be worth a 4th rounder
    14 nov. 2022 à 20 h 25
    #13
    Jah1722
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 5,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
    Quoting: DarcyTucker
    Healthy scratch on the Bruins? Alright that'd pass. But on the Canucks? A sub .300 team ? Yeaaah doesnt inspire confidence, not at that asking price lmao.


    I see you got nothing and I'm sure you’ll keep going on about nothing as long as you get the attention so I’ll just leave it at: it’s okay to be wrong.
    Juiceman a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage