SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tank for Bedard

Créé par: Ghost789
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 16 juill. 2022
Publié: 16 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sharks need to be a bottom 3 team next season so they can get into the lottery mix for #1 overall. They’ve never had a #1 draft selection ever. This would completely change the franchise.. much like Crosby, Ovi, Stamkos, McDavid, Matthews have done.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2850 000 $
2875 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Luff, Matt
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (DET)
DET
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. Simek, Radim
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Reimer will be dealt to a contender for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th round pick. He is a solid 1B goalie and can stand on his head in many situations. Even on a bad SJ team last year he was a Top 15 goalie.
3.
SJS
  1. Östlund, Noah
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
4.
SJS
  1. Zary, Connor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
CGY
    Couture, Logan

    This trade or to Buffalo
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de DET
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VAN
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2025
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2582 500 000 $58 798 334 $0 $715 000 $23 701 666 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    916 667 $916 667 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 juill. 2022 à 17 h 56
    #1
    FanOfAllTeams
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 787
    Mentions "j'aime": 296
    Buffalo pass easily
    16 juill. 2022 à 17 h 59
    #2
    MNBassman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 8,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,578
    No chance Buffalo considers that!
    16 juill. 2022 à 18 h 7
    #3
    Ryan Miller Is God
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 273
    Mentions "j'aime": 180
    Couture's combo of age and contract length is an immediate non-starter for Buffalo. At 33 with 5 more years at $8m, he will more than likely:

    - Regress sooner than later
    - Be an expensive contract to move once that happens
    - Tie up cap space when we have so many young, talented players to pay in the upcoming years

    The momentary short-term improvement is not worth all these downsides. And that isn't even considering losing a 2nd in a deep draft and a great playmaking center prospect.
    16 juill. 2022 à 18 h 11
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 319
    Mentions "j'aime": 69
    Quoting: AudioCats
    Couture's combo of age and contract length is an immediate non-starter for Buffalo. At 33 with 5 more years at $8m, he will more than likely:

    - Regress sooner than later
    - Be an expensive contract to move once that happens
    - Tie up cap space when we have so many young, talented players to pay in the upcoming years

    The momentary short-term improvement is not worth all these downsides. And that isn't even considering losing a 2nd in a deep draft and a great playmaking center prospect.


    I’ve seen GM’s make worse moves… If the Sharks could move Burns contract @37 years old.. they can move Couture for little to no salary retention @33 years old.. He’s always been a 50-60 point guy and a proven playoff performer. Maybe it won’t be Buffalo but I’m sure many teams who would consider him.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 juill. 2022 à 18 h 51
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,878
    Mentions "j'aime": 974
    Quoting: Ghost789
    I’ve seen GM’s make worse moves… If the Sharks could move Burns contract 37 years old.. they can move Couture for little to no salary retention 33 years old.. He’s always been a 50-60 point guy and a proven playoff performer. Maybe it won’t be Buffalo but I’m sure many teams who would consider him.


    Good luck!!
    16 juill. 2022 à 18 h 56
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 1,531
    Mentions "j'aime": 819
    easy pass
    16 juill. 2022 à 18 h 56
    #7
    BigDog91
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 1,509
    Mentions "j'aime": 374
    Quoting: Ghost789
    I’ve seen GM’s make worse moves… If the Sharks could move Burns contract 37 years old.. they can move Couture for little to no salary retention 33 years old.. He’s always been a 50-60 point guy and a proven playoff performer. Maybe it won’t be Buffalo but I’m sure many teams who would consider him.


    They can trade him but they will not be getting a return like this back. 16th overall pick in this years draft and second and in a deep draft for cap dumb. Not happening.
    16 juill. 2022 à 19 h 8
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,176
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,658
    I think Calgary is more likely than Buffalo at this point. It might be their last ditch effort to stay competitive. I think the sharks would have to take a contract back though.
    16 juill. 2022 à 19 h 29
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 319
    Mentions "j'aime": 69
    Quoting: glarson17
    I think Calgary is more likely than Buffalo at this point. It might be their last ditch effort to stay competitive. I think the sharks would have to take a contract back though.


    Yea I mean they were about to pay Johnny G 10M + per season.. so Coutures 8M AAV gives them more breathing room while still adding a reliable 1B Center who has proven playoff stats and success.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage