BigDog91

BigDog91
Membre depuis
20 mar 2019
Équipe préférée
Sabres de Buffalo
Anniversaire
13 aoû 1991
Messages dans les forums
973
Messages par jour
2,19
Sujets de discussion
165
Forum: Armchair-GM19 fév à 15 h 33
Forum: Armchair-GM19 fév à 15 h 12
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mikeyscav</b></div><div>Montour has played the left side this year so that helps your situation maybe some? Idk, I think Tippett in there is ridiculous but Montour and mitts I don’t think is unreasonable as the core of the trade</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mikeyscav</b></div><div>Montour has played the left side this year so that helps your situation maybe some? Idk, I think Tippett in there is ridiculous but Montour and mitts I don’t think is unreasonable as the core of the trade</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Top pair dman for a second line center?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kosterjr</b></div><div>Remove Tippett and the Cats might think about it</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockey91</b></div><div>I don’t get why buffalo fans continues to thik they’re gonna get trochek plus for Montour or risto. I don’t think they get the top 4 lhd part</div></div>

Trocheck is on pace for a 50 point season. You are acting like he is a top line center. He just came back from serious injury and it is pretty obvious he is not the same player. Montour has shown he can play on both sides this season and could easily flip a RHD in offseason if needed. That being said I think Mitts and Tippet are pretty much a wash but I thought each team would value the position more. Panthers could use another center to replace Torcheck and Tippet playing wing could be more beneficial since sabres have Cozens.

To say Montour or risto is not fair value trocheck is just crazy look at the market right now for rental bottom pairing dman. Scandella could barely make sabres starting lineup and Montreal got a 2nd and fourth. Montour is a top 4 puck moving Dman. Meanwhile, Trocheck is a under performing second line center and if panthers are looking to trade him they must think the injury will prevent him from being the point producer he was before.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 fév à 14 h 50
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgfresh78</b></div><div>That’s literally insane lmao</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgfresh78</b></div><div>That’s literally insane lmao</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>Don't need Dermott, we need RD, Bracco is never going to be in the NHL, Kappy a second and a young RD is probably the floor of a Manson deal value wise and idk if the Ducks take that</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgfresh78</b></div><div>I get what you mean but in that case idk if Anaheim is a match then because there’s no way Toronto will part with Liljegren.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>If Anaheim absolutely, positively HAD to trade Josh Manson to Toronto (i.e., at the point of a gun), the minimal requirements would be Nicholas Robertson or the 2020 second plus Timothy Liljegren. And you guys can't really afford to trade either of the first two and won't trade Liljegren. We understand. As we've been saying for months, Anaheim and Toronto simply aren't good trade partners.

One of the problems with all Manson-to-Toronto proposals is that many Maple Leafs fans think that because Liljegren arguably has a higher upside potential than Manson, that means that his trade value is the same. The two things are unrelated. Right now Manson's trade value is higher than Liljegren's because Manson is a proven NHL defenseman and Liljegren is not, no matter what anybody's hopes for the future are. We have our own version of Timothy Liljegren: Jacob Larsson. He was taken in roughly the same position in the draft as Liljegren and had higher "reviews," yet no one is suggesting that Larsson is Manson's equal -- yet.</div></div>

It is insane to think leaf fans can trade for top 4 dman under control for a career ahl player, bottom pairing nhl and late round pick.

Now u change to add kap which helps but they need dman way more then they need speedy third line winger. The rest prolly will never play in nhl or at least not be impact player.

It would be like them offering leafs 2nd and steel for Reilly.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 fév à 21 h 56
Sujet: Eichel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MadLin27</b></div><div>Tavares destroyed his career high in goals and points once paired with Marner...
Marners point totals increased because he was 21... Tavares was in his prime when his stats improved.

Yes. Mitch Marner would still produce point per game numbers without an "elite" centre on his line. 100%.
Marner is an elite winger. He might be overpaid slightly but by 1-2 million tops.

When guys are producing like Marner, that kind of overpay is fine. Its the Lucic, Backes, Eriksson, Ladd, Okposo contracts that are insane overpays.
Marner is delivering more or less close to his pay. Are their better contracts out there? yes. Slight overpay</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MadLin27</b></div><div>Tavares destroyed his career high in goals and points once paired with Marner...
Marners point totals increased because he was 21... Tavares was in his prime when his stats improved.

Yes. Mitch Marner would still produce point per game numbers without an "elite" centre on his line. 100%.
Marner is an elite winger. He might be overpaid slightly but by 1-2 million tops.

When guys are producing like Marner, that kind of overpay is fine. Its the Lucic, Backes, Eriksson, Ladd, Okposo contracts that are insane overpays.
Marner is delivering more or less close to his pay. Are their better contracts out there? yes. Slight overpay</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MadLin27</b></div><div>Tavares destroyed his career high in goals and points once paired with Marner...
Marners point totals increased because he was 21... Tavares was in his prime when his stats improved.

Yes. Mitch Marner would still produce point per game numbers without an "elite" centre on his line. 100%.
Marner is an elite winger. He might be overpaid slightly but by 1-2 million tops.

When guys are producing like Marner, that kind of overpay is fine. Its the Lucic, Backes, Eriksson, Ladd, Okposo contracts that are insane overpays.
Marner is delivering more or less close to his pay. Are their better contracts out there? yes. Slight overpay</div></div>

Taveres point increase was 2 point and goals total was 9 idk about you but I would not consider that destroyed career highs. Also is increase in goals just shows how good he actually is because he has always been the playmaker but when he had marner he need to be the finisher to maximize marner.
Marner has a increase of 25 points. Sure u can say age and experience but to think he would produce at same or even close to same rate without Mathews or Tavares is just crazy talk. Panarin and Kane are only wingers in the league that don’t need center to put up elite point totals and marner is not in the same league as those two.

While, he is easily over paid by 2 million since he didn’t sign 8 year deal. I do agree with him being so young and only getting better contract will not kill the team like the other contracts u mentioned.

That all being said marner is a very good player and will continue to put up elite numbers because Matthew or Tavares are not going anywhere. But it does not make an elite player.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 fév à 13 h 56
Sujet: Eichel