SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Columbus we will help you

Créé par: Nik_SH
Équipe: 2022-23 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 14 juill. 2022
Publié: 14 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 150 000 $
1800 000 $
1850 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
CBJ
    Have fun with Johnny and Laine at the same line
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    2024
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    2025
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de NSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $75 412 767 $0 $295 000 $7 087 233 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    874 125 $874 125 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    733 333 $733 333 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    733 333 $733 333 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    14 juill. 2022 à 7 h 42
    #1
    CHI NYI
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 4,663
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
    But why?
    14 juill. 2022 à 7 h 42
    #2
    AM19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 398
    Mentions "j'aime": 178
    Yay good deal he will look good next to Joey. What do we need to give up? Or future considerations is good?
    Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2022 à 7 h 45
    #3
    Yegor bomb
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 782
    Mentions "j'aime": 948
    Quoting: AM19
    Yay good deal he will look good next to Joey. What do we need to give up? Or future considerations is good?


    I feel like if injury prone Patches got given away at 7 mil with just an okay prospect/player we can get away with just shipping Gus out for free (Future considerations)
    squashmaple et benjgc a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2022 à 8 h 17
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Nik_SH
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 638
    Mentions "j'aime": 77
    Quoting: AM19
    Yay good deal he will look good next to Joey. What do we need to give up? Or future considerations is good?


    Just take our congratulations, no need to add something else)
    dk325, Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2022 à 11 h 18
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    I'd rather give Tolvy another shot in the top 6 than take Nyquist for free. Nyquist is a massive defensive liability and past his prime. Bad use of our cap space to get nothing for helping the Blue Jackets.
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 19
    #6
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,817
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,307
    Quoting: SnipeRV
    I'd rather give Tolvy another shot in the top 6 than take Nyquist for free. Nyquist is a massive defensive liability

    Tell me you haven't seen Nyquist without saying you haven't seen Nyquist. The guy's just fine defensively.

    Frankly, I want him on the Preds; I think he'd be a good mentoring/stopgap option for whichever of Tolvanen/Tomasino isn't stepping up on the second line.
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 45
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Quoting: Viqsi
    Tell me you haven't seen Nyquist without saying you haven't seen Nyquist. The guy's just fine defensively.

    Frankly, I want him on the Preds; I think he'd be a good mentoring/stopgap option for whichever of Tolvanen/Tomasino isn't stepping up on the second line.


    Screen-Shot-2022-04-19-at-12.28.33-PM.png
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 46
    #8
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,817
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,307
    Quoting: SnipeRV
    Screen-Shot-2022-04-19-at-12.28.33-PM.png

    Based on those cards, literally every single player on the Jackets is a massive defensive liability save Bjorkstrand, Bemstrom, and Robinson. They do not adequately correct for team context.
    benjgc et Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 47
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Please don't tell me your eye test for the defensive abilities of a winger are better than one of the best public statistical models. Aging winger not worth his cap hit that has gotten steadily worst the past few seasons.
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 48
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    18 goals in 82 games is not the scoring 2nd line winger we need
    14 juill. 2022 à 17 h 52
    #11
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,817
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,307
    Quoting: SnipeRV
    Please don't tell me your eye test for the defensive abilities of a winger are better than one of the best public statistical models.

    The bolded is why your assessment is not worth what you think it is.
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    15 juill. 2022 à 10 h 55
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Quoting: Viqsi
    The bolded is why your assessment is not worth what you think it is.


    I guarantee its better than your eye test.
    15 juill. 2022 à 10 h 56
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Quoting: Viqsi
    Based on those cards, literally every single player on the Jackets is a massive defensive liability save Bjorkstrand, Bemstrom, and Robinson. They do not adequately correct for team context.


    CBJ

    maybe because your defense sucked last year???
    15 juill. 2022 à 13 h 9
    #14
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,817
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,307
    Quoting: SnipeRV
    CBJ

    maybe because your defense sucked last year???

    Gosh, yes, it did. The whole team was having it rough because of a major defensive strategy change that came with the coaching change, not to mention a starting goaltender struggling with PTSD. A sane evaluation would be that this drags everybody down. You seem instead to have gone for "that means that everybody on the roster sucks".
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    15 juill. 2022 à 13 h 16
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Quoting: Viqsi
    Gosh, yes, it did. The whole team was having it rough because of a major defensive strategy change that came with the coaching change, not to mention a starting goaltender struggling with PTSD. A sane evaluation would be that this drags everybody down. You seem instead to have gone for "that means that everybody on the roster sucks".


    I agree that taking a player from the bad system and putting him in a better position to succeed will make him better. But you also can't ignore that the players, both collectively and individually, must have been part of the problem as well. So when I see an aging winger known for his scoring ability making $5M, only scoring 18 goals despite getting a ton of ice time, and having bad defensive metrics to boot, I'm not keen to want him on my team. Adding him to our team would be a marginal improvement at best. At worst he takes ice time from younger guys that are still developing.
    15 juill. 2022 à 13 h 18
    #16
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,817
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,307
    Quoting: SnipeRV
    I agree that taking a player from the bad system and putting him in a better position to succeed will make him better. But you also can't ignore that the players, both collectively and individually, must have been part of the problem as well. So when I see an aging winger known for his scoring ability making $5M, only scoring 18 goals despite getting a ton of ice time, and having bad defensive metrics to boot, I'm not keen to want him on my team. Adding him to our team would be a marginal improvement at best. At worst he takes ice time from younger guys that are still developing.

    53 points in 82 games is that of a second-line forward. You're deliberately twisting it to make him sound terrible.
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    15 juill. 2022 à 13 h 22
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 412
    Mentions "j'aime": 126
    Quoting: Viqsi
    53 points in 82 games is that of a second-line forward. You're deliberately twisting it to make him sound terrible.


    lol he isn't terrible, he just isn't worth his cap hit and doesn't solve our problems at all. WE NEED GOAL SCORING. That's why I point to his goal totals. He has scored 1 goal in his last 30 playoff games. OOF!!
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage