SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(CAR/SJS) - Lorentz, Mäkiniemi and conditional 2023 3rd rd pick for Burns, Pederson

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


13 juill. 2022 à 15 h 59
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,219
Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
Canes win easy.

This should have been the price for burns with no retention. With retention it’s a steal.
Vizix, areax91 et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 16 h 7
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 28
How come this trade happened but the Sharks haven't bought out Vlasic?
13 juill. 2022 à 16 h 10
#28
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,812
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
If anybody wanted to see a massive fleecing, you came to the right place.

Carolina wins the trade.
13 juill. 2022 à 16 h 31
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 317
Mentions "j'aime": 180
Quoting: TaiwanNumberOne
How come this trade happened but the Sharks haven't bought out Vlasic?

I was very happy the team didn't buy out Vlasic. I would much rather have his contract off the books sooner than save more in a meaningless season. Vlasic being there also helps in the Sharks' campaign to Tank Hard for Bedard, whereas Burns actually had some positive value. I would absolutely have preferred a better pick/prospect in return, but I think the Sharks were desperate to get some cap flexibility and that might be the best they were able to find.

Quoting: Stones6160
Umm, Grier?

Trade 11 for 3 picks, giving up the chance for a higher talent guy/armstronged


The trade from 11 to 27, 34, and 45 was a good value trade. That being said, aside from Havelid at 45, I'm not super happy with who they took with those picks. I'd argue that trade was the most logical move he's made since becoming GM.
areax91 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 16 h 54
#30
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,292
Mentions "j'aime": 25,195
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Canes win he deal but the Sharks finally have legit cap and a bit of breathing room for the first time in YEARS. Though my team lost the trade, I am breathing a bit better now.


In the mid-1960's (I'm old enough to have forgotten the year) I was pleased to attend a match on Randall's Island in the East River between the boroughs of Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx featuring West Ham United with Geoff Hurst up front, Martin Peters in midfield and Bobby Moore at the back. There were fewer than 5,000 fans in attendance.
Kjell_Forsman a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 17 h 16
#31
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,008
Mentions "j'aime": 20,950
Quoting: Remus
Don Waddell is either absolutely stoned or incredibly sober


He didnt have an revenge offersheet to throw out so he went lets go with meh trade
13 juill. 2022 à 17 h 21
#32
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: OldNYIfan
In the mid-1960's (I'm old enough to have forgotten the year) I was pleased to attend a match on Randall's Island in the East River between the boroughs of Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx featuring West Ham United with Geoff Hurst up front, Martin Peters in midfield and Bobby Moore at the back. There were fewer than 5,000 fans in attendance.


Nice! I've only followed the Mighty Hammers for about 5 years but I have some mates who can relate to experiences like that.
13 juill. 2022 à 17 h 41
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: jamnjon
I was very happy the team didn't buy out Vlasic. I would much rather have his contract off the books sooner than save more in a meaningless season. Vlasic being there also helps in the Sharks' campaign to Tank Hard for Bedard, whereas Burns actually had some positive value. I would absolutely have preferred a better pick/prospect in return, but I think the Sharks were desperate to get some cap flexibility and that might be the best they were able to find.



The trade from 11 to 27, 34, and 45 was a good value trade. That being said, aside from Havelid at 45, I'm not super happy with who they took with those picks. I'd argue that trade was the most logical move he's made since becoming GM.


If the goal is cap flexibility then they should have bought out Vlasic and saved $6.75M. They could plug his spot with some younger players to get some experience. The additional cap penalty of $1.69M that starts in 2026 is peanuts as the cap will go up significantly by then.

If the Sharks wanted to trade Burns, they'd be dealing from a better position of strength if they bought out Vlasic first, since other GMs wouldn't see them as desperate for cap flexibility.
13 juill. 2022 à 17 h 45
#34
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,292
Mentions "j'aime": 25,195
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Nice! I've only followed the Mighty Hammers for about 5 years but I have some mates who can relate to experiences like that.


Now that I think back, I was still in high school, so it was in 1964 or 1965. Maybe you and your mates can dredge up the reference from the archives. It wasn't the game they played against Santos in 1970 because I was otherwise occupied overseas at the time.
13 juill. 2022 à 18 h 12
#35
BigMeech
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 1,554
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Quoting: Devil
FXkgPgWWYAAuzkY?format=jpg&name=medium


lmfao
13 juill. 2022 à 18 h 35
#36
Jamie Benn is BACK
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 630
Mentions "j'aime": 478
Wow. Great trade for Carolina.

All I can think about is that idiot Jim Nill really couldn't submit a better offer than that for Burns?
14 juill. 2022 à 10 h 12
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,052
Mentions "j'aime": 548
Quoting: aadoyle
He didnt have an revenge offersheet to throw out so he went lets go with meh trade


He could offer sheet Kakko as revenge for signing Trocheck. They need a center though, not another winger.
15 juill. 2022 à 1 h 38
#38
BigMeech
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 1,554
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Quoting: areax91
We should have gotten a 2nd round pick at the least for the retention, but this trade had to be done given the Sharks' cap situation. Take care of him Canes, you got a hell of a wookie on your team.


so much for sharks fans saying burns is worth 1st round picks +++
16 juill. 2022 à 1 h 5
#39
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: CSStrowbridge
Burns at $8 million is awful.
Burns at $5.4 million is doable.

Getting him without losing any real pieces is great.


Makiniemi is a pretty strong goalie prospect. Had an excellent year last year before injury. 11-2 .922 SV%
16 juill. 2022 à 12 h 32
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,121
Mentions "j'aime": 855
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Makiniemi is a pretty strong goalie prospect. Had an excellent year last year before injury. 11-2 .922 SV%


I would be impressed if he's playing in the NHL within the next two seasons. He's a prospect, vs. a piece.
29 juill. 2022 à 12 h 15
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,052
Mentions "j'aime": 548
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Canes win easy.

This should have been the price for burns with no retention. With retention it’s a steal.


It’s his age, and only his age, that lowered his value. Nobody was going to give up assets for a 37-year-old signed for 3 more years at $8M cap hit without retention, no matter how good he was this past season. How much longer can he play 26 minutes a game?

This is one situation where I’m not sure it makes sense for the cap hit to be equal to the AAV for the whole contract. His average total salary for the next 3 years is only $5.5M, which seems reasonable given the decline you would expect over an 8-year contract for a player that age. Carolina doesn’t care about the money, so if that was also his cap hit, the Sharks wouldn’t have had to retain. On the other hand, that would have made his cap hit $10M at the beginning of the contract when the Sharks were still a contender. Retaining salary now is the price they pay for the lower cap hit they enjoyed then.

Even with the retention I think this is still a bigger risk for Carolina than keeping DeAngelo at 2x$5M (assuming he would have signed the same contract in Carolina as in Philadelphia, and didn’t take less there because he’d rather play for Tortorella than Brind’Amour), but more upside if Burns doesn’t start playing like a guy in his late 30s.
17 août 2022 à 14 h 51
#42
Why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 39
I think this was one of the rare trades that one team won and the other lost, but that both teams can feel good about. My Canes didn't give up too much for a great offensive righty and got SJ to retain some of that ghastly contract he signed, but SJ clears cap space and gets a great young guy in Stevie and a Mak seems like a decent goalie prospect.
Canucks123 a aimé ceci.
3 mars 2023 à 5 h 45
#43
BigMeech
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 1,554
Mentions "j'aime": 349
Quoting: CSStrowbridge
Burns at $8 million is awful.
Burns at $5.4 million is doable.

Getting him without losing any real pieces is great.


this was a steal looking bacj
CSStrowbridge a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage