Flames accept

is it fair or should i add a little more on the flames side do you think

It is certainly obvious that Winnipeg would and should say no to all the trades. I'm guessing just a troll post.

Yea youd be wrong by a lot
WPG need big change not every trade is a hundred percent a win but they need players picks and to revitlise
this very much helps them do that and also maybe bury Smith and sign a 5 mil Starter

Maybe that's how you would build a team, but you'd surely be fired before making the first trade. You may not know this, but trading good players for bad players doesn't make teams better.

I agree though that you can definitely say every trade is not a 100% win as they are all 100% loses for the Jets, no doubt.

i revised a trade or too but yea if i was a good gm i be gming not making trades on cap friendly lmao

Why on earth would they bury Smith? Have you not been paying attention to the past 2 years? And he's currently one of the top goalies in the playoffs.

well he is part of a trade so not really buried is he

Boston isn't trading their future (and maybe even current) #1 goalie

That Helly trade may give me nightmares. Even if he demanded a trade, I'd think he'd bring back far more quality than that.
Like, if Skinner was switched for Smith, for example. That would at least be closer.

You’re off your rocker if you think the bruins even consider that.

I thought about putting ullmark instead is that more fair

Swayman has roughly 100 times the value of ullmark. The fact that you thought those two were even close to interchangeable is bananas.

Ullmark has a NMC and I don't see him waiving it honestly. When he goes to a NTC then he'll be movable. Vesalainen has little to no value and wouldn't crack the Bruins roster.

That leaves DeBrusk + 1st + 3rd + 3rd for Scheifele. While I do think Scheifele is overrated as hell, that offer isn't going interest WPG.