SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Off-season using comps

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2022
Publié: 30 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tried to do an off-season using only moves where there are applicable comps. None are perfect apples-to-apples. Open to suggestions for better comps if available.

------

Contract comps (RFAs)

Bratt:
Ehlers (2018): $6,000,000 x 7 years
Nylander (2018): $6,962,366 x 6 years

Mangiapane:
Buchnevich (2021): $5,800,000 x 4 years
Teravainen (2019): $5,400,000 x 5 years

Wood:
Foegele (2021): $2,750,000 x 3 years
McGinn (2021): $2,750,000 x 4 years

Contract comps (UFAs)

Nichushkin:
Iaffalo (2021): $4,000,000 x 4 years
Bjorkstrand (2021): $5,400,000 x 5 years
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
76 500 000 $
22 800 000 $
2970 000 $
2800 000 $
55 500 000 $
43 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Zetterlund, Fabian [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Similar to Graves trade last year.

GAR/60
Graves (2019-21) +.29
Roy (2020-22) +.24

No expansion draft, so Kings get a better prospect. Pick is #69 (was #61 in Graves deal)
2.
NJD
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
CGY
  1. Kuokkanen, Janne
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Similar to Buchnevich trade last year

GAR/60
Buch (2019-21) +.60
Mang (2020-22) +.58
Blais (2019-21) +.13
Kuok (2020-22) +.16

PPG
Buch (2019-21) 0.77
Mang (2020-22) 0.64
Blais (2019-21) 0.37
Kuok (2020-22) 0.39

Like Rangers last year, Flames will have some key names to re-sign this off-season. Calgary is getting a younger, better player who is on slightly higher contract ($1.8m vs $1.5m). They are also getting a better pick (#37 vs #56).
3.
NJD
  1. Niederbach, Theodor [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
DET
  1. Zacha, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Similar to Sam Bennett trade last year (Heineman + 2nd) between CGY and FLA

GAR/60
Bennett (2015-21) +0.03
Zacha (2015-22) +0.08

PPG
Bennett (2014-21) 0.38
Zacha (2015-22) 0.46

Like Zacha, Bennett was former top-10 pick and pending RFA that could play center or wing. At time of deal, Bennett was career 0.38 ppg player in a 0.32 ppg season (Zacha is career 0.46 ppg player in 0.51 ppg season). Like Niederbach, Heineman was recent 2nd round pick playing in Sweden.
4.
NJD
  1. Samsonov, Ilya [Droits de RFA]
WSH
  1. Misyul, Daniil [Liste de réserve]
  2. Thompson, Tyce
Détails additionnels:
Similar to Jaroslav Halak trade in 2010 (Lars Eller and Ian Schultz)

Save %
Halak (2008-10): 0.921
Sam (2020-22): 0.902

GAA
Halak (2008-10): 2.56
Sam (2020-22): 2.81

Eller was a 21y forward prospect (#3 on Blues list at the time) who had been coming off a 0.81 ppg season in AHL (Tyce was 0.87 this year in partial season). Schultz was the Blues 17th ranked prospect at the time and long-shot to make NHL. Habs likely got the better prospect package, but were sending a goalie with better track record.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de WSH
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $80 319 167 $0 $1 782 500 $2 180 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
970 000 $970 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 avr. 2022 à 21 h 52
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,289
Mentions "j'aime": 10,627
No thanks from Calgary
aedoran a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 21 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
the buchnevich trade is universally regarded as one of the worst trades in recent memory, both before and after the trade, why would you use that as a comparable lol
Gmonwy et aedoran a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,322
Mentions "j'aime": 19,559
Everyone and their dog knows the Rangers got fleeced in that trade, do not use it as a base deal.

Easy no for the Flames
Gmonwy et aedoran a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 16
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,169
Mentions "j'aime": 18,354
Quoting: Alfie11
the buchnevich trade is universally regarded as one of the worst trades in recent memory, both before and after the trade, why would you use that as a comparable lol


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Everyone and their dog knows the Rangers got fleeced in that trade, do not use it as a base deal.

Easy no for the Flames


Give me a better comp to use and I’ll use it.
But it’s still what sets the market.
Can use the Reinhart deal as well.
Or Arvidsson. Or Burakovsky.

Wingers are usually cheaper in real life than ACGM

(also salary cap can distort value…but if Calgary is letting Gaudreau walk, it changes things)
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 20
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 7,792
Mentions "j'aime": 4,483
Detroit passes, No need for Zacha.
aedoran, Billy12Bob et DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 21
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 105
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Modifié 30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 36
On the Zacha trade there is a big difference in the comp. One it was a trade deadline deal that increases the cost of a player generally and second FLA is a competitive team in the middle of push for a cup. Neither of these things are present in the deal here.
aedoran, Billy12Bob et DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 33
#7
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Well thought out and your valuation of Zacha is fine, but I don't see a fit in Detroit.
Billy12Bob et NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2022 à 22 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,082
Mentions "j'aime": 9,341
What would be comparisons you would use for Boeser, Garland, and/or Bratt trades (I know Bratt is unlikely but he was in some rumours at the deadline for some reason)

I assume something similar to Buchnevich/Reinhart? Although I haven’t done the research you’ve done here (which is quite a lot)
1 mai 2022 à 0 h 29
#9
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,935
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Quoting: mv21227
What would be comparisons you would use for Boeser, Garland, and/or Bratt trades (I know Bratt is unlikely but he was in some rumours at the deadline for some reason)

I assume something similar to Buchnevich/Reinhart? Although I haven’t done the research you’ve done here (which is quite a lot)


Frank Seravalli made up the rumor about Bratt on deadline day. GM Fitzgerald said he is having talks with Bratt about a new contract now that the season is over

Boeser fits with the Reinhart, Buchnevich comparable

Not sure about Garland. It’s uncommon we see a player with that much term get traded one year into his deal
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
1 mai 2022 à 1 h 9
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,082
Mentions "j'aime": 9,341
Quoting: Devil
Frank Seravalli made up the rumor about Bratt on deadline day. GM Fitzgerald said he is having talks with Bratt about a new contract now that the season is over

Boeser fits with the Reinhart, Buchnevich comparable

Not sure about Garland. It’s uncommon we see a player with that much term get traded one year into his deal


Yeah I fully don’t expect Bratt to get traded, just wonder what his comparable would be
Devil a aimé ceci.
1 mai 2022 à 3 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,322
Mentions "j'aime": 19,559
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Give me a better comp to use and I’ll use it.
But it’s still what sets the market.
Can use the Reinhart deal as well.
Or Arvidsson. Or Burakovsky.

Wingers are usually cheaper in real life than ACGM

(also salary cap can distort value…but if Calgary is letting Gaudreau walk, it changes things)


Arvidsson is much older and Reinhart was on record saying he would not sign long term in Buffalo
Burakovsky was traded as a struggling young player.

I would want something similar to Mantha at least
1 mai 2022 à 16 h 1
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 1,739
Mentions "j'aime": 971
Wings have no use for Zacha, terrible trade for them
1 mai 2022 à 18 h 0
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,169
Mentions "j'aime": 18,354
Quoting: mv21227
Yeah I fully don’t expect Bratt to get traded, just wonder what his comparable would be


The only reason I would see NJD moving him is if they cannot sign him long-term (or at reasonable $$). Wouldn’t be a cap move. So I would think Sam Reinhart would be pretty close (sounded like Reinhart was only willing to take 1-year deals in Buffalo so he go to UFA quicker).
1 mai 2022 à 18 h 13
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,169
Mentions "j'aime": 18,354
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Arvidsson is much older and Reinhart was on record saying he would not sign long term in Buffalo
Burakovsky was traded as a struggling young player.

I would want something similar to Mantha at least


Caps got fleeced in Caps deal. Was clear at time. Still clear now. Flames may ask for that, but few would offer in off-season.

90% said Detroit won Mantha trade

Also, Mantha was a deadline deal and was under contract for 4 years. Mangiapane will be an RFA.

And if Flames move him, it would be to make space for Gaudreau and Tkachuk, no? So maybe futures and ELCs only going back. They’d probably end up with something that looks more like JT Miller to VAN deal.
1 mai 2022 à 21 h 5
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,322
Mentions "j'aime": 19,559
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Caps got fleeced in Caps deal. Was clear at time. Still clear now. Flames may ask for that, but few would offer in off-season.

90% said Detroit won Mantha trade

Also, Mantha was a deadline deal and was under contract for 4 years. Mangiapane will be an RFA.

And if Flames move him, it would be to make space for Gaudreau and Tkachuk, no? So maybe futures and ELCs only going back. They’d probably end up with something that looks more like JT Miller to VAN deal.


You dont move guys like Mangiapane to do that, especially when you have guys like Lucic and Monahan you can move instead
1 mai 2022 à 22 h 14
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,169
Mentions "j'aime": 18,354
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You dont move guys like Mangiapane to do that, especially when you have guys like Lucic and Monahan you can move instead


Not many teams would want Lucic or Monahan.
I’d imagine the latter is a buyout candidate if he is not LTIR’ed.

If they get Gaudreau and Tkachuk to take discounts, that would be ideal.
1 mai 2022 à 22 h 40
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,322
Mentions "j'aime": 19,559
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Not many teams would want Lucic or Monahan.
I’d imagine the latter is a buyout candidate if he is not LTIR’ed.

If they get Gaudreau and Tkachuk to take discounts, that would be ideal.


I disagree on Looch, quite a few teams would probably be interested in him. Anaheim definitely comes to mind there.

As for Monahan he's very low risk high reward. Centers are always a premium
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage