DeadWingsv2

Membre depuis
1 mai 2018
Messages dans les forums
170
Messages par jour
0,22
Sujets de discussion
5
Forum: Armchair-GM27 fév à 17 h 01
Sujet: Draft Day trades and FA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>His RAPM is where i's always been his PDO is down the toilet and his Hockeyviz heat maps are as elite as usual. He's been unlucky, not bad. They're getting players not good enough to make a HISTORICALLY bad Red Wings team and a move down in draft picks. This isn't close.</div></div>

The only reason Cholowski wasn't up here all year, was they wanted him to play big minutes in the AHL and work on his defensive side of the game, Svech was coming off a torn ACL and they wanted him to ease back in, or he would have made the team out of camp. They're both still good prospects and are both going to be effective NHL players and the ceiling for both is still very high. We'll just agree to disagree, because I don't think this is off at all and if anything, I felt like Detroit was overpaying. Especially considering that Carolina is going to have a massive logjam back there and need a player with options (ala Cholowski) if they plan on keeping, Vatanen, Fleury or Edmundson, not to mention cap management...
Forum: Armchair-GM19 fév à 14 h 16
Sujet: Green scored someone take him
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>redwings_fun</b></div><div>Detroit will have a huge amount of cap space next year will all the old guys gone. 1 extra year to retain 2.5 on two guys is nothing in the long run. Referring to a player like Abby or Nielsen then yes it would be a bad idea but not guys who only have one year after this and also low in salary. Detroit will probably over pay on someone next year just to reach the salary floor</div></div>
It just doesn't make sense for picks that are still probably years out from being NHL ready, especially with the logjam of prospects/picks they already have. Now, if you were talking about a 1st rounder (which neither of them are worth), it would make a lot more sense to me. I don't think your rationale or approach is wrong, I just don't think it's necessary...