SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

merging two trade rumors

Créé par: knuxles
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 18 janv. 2022
Publié: 18 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Rumor has it the Rangers are interested in doing Lehkonen for Kravtsov and Chariot for a 1st. This is what it would look like if we merged these two trade rumors into one trade.
Transactions
MTL
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de NYR
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $64 399 227 $597 561 $2 325 000 $17 100 773 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
761 250 $761 250 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,142
Mentions "j'aime": 3,629
HUGE L for NYR in that trade.
HOCKEYBOY448 et Vermathex a aimé ceci.
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,564
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
I don’t understand the fascination with spending multiple assets this year. The team may be in a great position but is not good enough to win in the playoffs yet. Too much youth in the lineup with very little to no playoff experience.
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 9
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Where are these rumors??
F50marco a aimé ceci.
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,734
Mentions "j'aime": 586
chiarot is actually terrible at 5v5 i wouldn't want him on my team for free
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
I like Lehkonen, but the last thing the Rangers need is another 3rd line Winger.

They found some magic these last couple games moving Chytil to RW. But realistically, that's what they should target.

Reilly Smith. Joe Pavelski. Tomas Hertl.

They have enough Bottom 6 Forwards without Lehkonen
18 janv. 2022 à 22 h 35
#6
Jimbo1119
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,810
Mentions "j'aime": 760
Giving up a 1st for ANY player on an expiring contract should be a fireable offense...Look no further than Zuc...most thought he'd land a 1st- he ended up landing a 2nd and 3rd, with pie-in -the sky conditions for those picks to become 1sts...Zuc got hurt in his VERY FIRST GAME- and was a non factor for DAL. The conditions were never met, and the NYR kept the 2nd and 3rd. The NHL is much too random, and way too many things can happen to take on so much risk (a 1st round pick) for 1 cup run.

BTW...if the team has the intention to extend the player- then I change this stance. But due to CAP considerations, I do not think the Rangers can afford (going forward) any player warranting a 1st round pick.
18 janv. 2022 à 23 h 7
#7
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
I thought the rumors about Ben Chiarot for a 1st round pick weren’t regarding a specific team. I only heard about Lehkonen for Kravtsov from Arthur Staple (which I like)
18 janv. 2022 à 23 h 9
#8
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Shakabakes
I like Lehkonen, but the last thing the Rangers need is another 3rd line Winger.

They found some magic these last couple games moving Chytil to RW. But realistically, that's what they should target.

Reilly Smith. Joe Pavelski. Tomas Hertl.

They have enough Bottom 6 Forwards without Lehkonen


For what it’s worth, trading for Tomas Hertl probably requires trading Chytil to San Jose. Then you’ll have an opening on the 3RW for a player like Lehkonen.
18 janv. 2022 à 23 h 10
#9
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I don’t understand the fascination with spending multiple assets this year. The team may be in a great position but is not good enough to win in the playoffs yet. Too much youth in the lineup with very little to no playoff experience.


Uh… if the team is not good enough to win in the playoffs in your opinion, then why wouldn’t you want to spend assets to make the team better so that it is good enough to win?
18 janv. 2022 à 23 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,493
Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
Quoting: Shakabakes
I like Lehkonen, but the last thing the Rangers need is another 3rd line Winger.

They found some magic these last couple games moving Chytil to RW. But realistically, that's what they should target.

Reilly Smith. Joe Pavelski. Tomas Hertl.

They have enough Bottom 6 Forwards without Lehkonen


I agree and will add that the last thing Montreal needs is another RW'er so I don't see the point in this rumor. We aren't moving any of Anderson, Gallagher or Caufield. With Armia and Toffoli both being natural RW's I just don't see this kind of move making sense.
18 janv. 2022 à 23 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,588
Mentions "j'aime": 6,728
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Where are these rumors??


Agreed. I've seen the Lehkonen to NYR rumours but nothing about NYR being interested in Chiarot. Can you link to a source for that?
19 janv. 2022 à 0 h 55
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,564
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mhroblak
Uh… if the team is not good enough to win in the playoffs in your opinion, then why wouldn’t you want to spend assets to make the team better so that it is good enough to win?


I simply think they shouldn’t rush things. Just cause they’re at the top of the division doesn’t automatically make them contenders. Most teams take time to gain experience before getting over the hump. I just think this isn’t the year for big moves like that. Next year could make a lot more sense. No point in spending a 1st and burning a decent prospect to be beat in 5 or 6 games.
19 janv. 2022 à 2 h 18
#13
Ioriomilkshake
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,444
Mentions "j'aime": 457
Make the 1st a 2nd and it's reasonable. Chiarot and Lehkonen won't get this kind of return..
19 janv. 2022 à 11 h 10
#14
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I simply think they shouldn’t rush things. Just cause they’re at the top of the division doesn’t automatically make them contenders. Most teams take time to gain experience before getting over the hump. I just think this isn’t the year for big moves like that. Next year could make a lot more sense. No point in spending a 1st and burning a decent prospect to be beat in 5 or 6 games.


You really don’t see any possible trade involving a 1st and a prospect that would return a player who can help the Rangers make it to the second round? I really don’t see how that’s rushing things either unless that prospect is someone who has an apparent long term future window with the Blueshirts. It’s a waste of time.
19 janv. 2022 à 13 h 40
#15
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I simply think they shouldn’t rush things. Just cause they’re at the top of the division doesn’t automatically make them contenders. Most teams take time to gain experience before getting over the hump. I just think this isn’t the year for big moves like that. Next year could make a lot more sense. No point in spending a 1st and burning a decent prospect to be beat in 5 or 6 games.


Quoting: mhroblak
You really don’t see any possible trade involving a 1st and a prospect that would return a player who can help the Rangers make it to the second round? I really don’t see how that’s rushing things either unless that prospect is someone who has an apparent long term future window with the Blueshirts. It’s a waste of time.


You're both sorta right, the answer is kinda in the middle. Package somehow for an upgrade, but on the cheap, ie an ELC like Lapierre. Possibly for a cost controlled vet, ie Couture@1/2. Pavelski as a ufa instead of for assets, considering we don't have many "tradable" assets
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2022 à 20 h 47
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,564
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: mhroblak
You really don’t see any possible trade involving a 1st and a prospect that would return a player who can help the Rangers make it to the second round? I really don’t see how that’s rushing things either unless that prospect is someone who has an apparent long term future window with the Blueshirts. It’s a waste of time.


Wtf is the point of burning a 1st and decent prospect to maybe get to the second round. Those moves only make sense if you’re a single move from the cup, otherwise this **** is a crapshoot at best. What happens if they make a move like this and get swept or bounced in 5 games, it’s worthless. They aren’t a Tampa or Colorado. Seems like people everywhere seem to have serious blinders on with this season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage