SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks refresh

Créé par: DenisPotvin
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2022
Publié: 14 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hertl is leaving, the Sharks would be wasting Meier's prime years, Barabanov/Reimer/Nieto has no place on a rebuilding team, and Burns is only getting older. Fundamentally they need to make their team worse so that they can actually rebuild. With these trades, they get a bunch of players who will be in or near their prime when the team is actually ready to compete. They can continue to trade pieces like Hill, Compher, and Bonino at future trade deadlines for more assets.

Florida pays the admittedly high price for the highest ES scorer in the league. They seem to have really good center depth but I don't think they have a lot of natural right-wingers...Meier would instantly be the best one on their team.

The Colorado trade I'm sure is controversial. In my mind, this is Colorado trading some really good futures (Newhook, 1st-rounder), a decent player who's probably a bit too expensive (Compher), and a very good player who may not be a great fit (he's had two consecutive poor playoffs and Colorado is deep on the left-defense) for short-term help. This is an "I'll pay you two hamburgers tomorrow for a hamburger today" deal. Hertl and Barabanov would almost assuredly just be rentals for them, but would of course make their team much stronger for this season. Reimer would be a very solid goaltending option (quite cheaply) for two years. Burns is still a top defenseman and is now fairly cheap; at least for 2 playoff runs he should be great.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Lundell, Anton
  2. Tippett, Owen
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
2.
COL
  1. Barabanov, Alexander
  2. Burns, Brent (3 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Hertl, Tomas (2 812 500 $ retained)
  4. Nieto, Matt
  5. Reimer, James (1 125 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 559 999 $0 $3 205 000 $13 940 001 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
848 333 $848 333 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
866 667 $866 667 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. 2022 à 2 h 57
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Talk about Galaxy braining
14 janv. 2022 à 3 h 1
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,184
Mentions "j'aime": 3,664
Colorado fans are going to rip you a new one
coga16, Foppa21 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2022 à 3 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: glarson17
Colorado fans are going to rip you a new one


Only because FLO have no fans because that’s horrid for FLO
14 janv. 2022 à 3 h 19
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 520
Florida isn't doing this! Are you kidding? Lundell is already too damn good, and Florida's 3c on cheap contract
14 janv. 2022 à 3 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,140
Mentions "j'aime": 446
Florida isn't doing that. Their strength is their depth on the wing. Plus, the Panthers lead the league even strength GF, Meier doesn't cater to the Panthers' needs
Hockey91 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2022 à 8 h 26
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Avs don’t consider that even for a second, that’s just bad business for them and an easy massive decline
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2022 à 9 h 1
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,485
Mentions "j'aime": 9,116
You know the COL trade is bad for COL really bad, like ridiculous bad. Older, more expensive and worse is never a way to go in a trade.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2022 à 10 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: Xqb15a
You know the COL trade is bad for COL really bad, like ridiculous bad. Older, more expensive and worse is never a way to go in a trade.


Quoting: coga16
Avs don’t consider that even for a second, that’s just bad business for them and an easy massive decline


It's also just absurdly complex. When was the last time there were 9 players involved in a two-team trade? The EK trade to San Jose and Kessel to Pittsburgh trades are the only ones that come even close, and it's still off.

@DenisPotvin The only attractive return for the Avs there is Hertl, and Burns is untradeable, even with retention.
Xqb15a, coga16 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2022 à 13 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 908
Easy declines for Florida and Colorado.
TJTwolf et nyrfan81 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage