Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

RaZZe

Membre depuis
4 juill. 2020
Équipe favorite
Panthers de la Floride
Messages dans les forums
610
Messages par jour
1.17
Sujets de discussion
8
Forum: Armchair-GM29 nov. à 8 h 34
Forum: Armchair-GM29 nov. à 8 h 32
Sujet: 2022 Trade Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Timtim</b></div><div>Thanks for your feedback.

FLA couldn’t afford Miller for Lundell one for one. They have less than 60k in cap space. If they would like to add going into the playoffs, they would need to find a team to take on 5+ M in cap space. Maybe someone would take a 4th line winger making 5.3 with term. Historically teams have to give up a first to make that happen. = Lundell(-)

Also, consider FLA’s window. In 2 years, when Miller’s deal expires, so will Huberdeau, Weeger and Knight, who will all be due some raises. These next two years are massive for FLA to compete with TB.</div></div>

Dumping Hornqvist won't cost anything as he is still good for 20 goals and 50 points. Heck, he had only a goal less than Miller last year even though he played 9 fewer games. He is only a 4th liner thanks to Florida's depth.
This season, Hornqvist has as many or more points as Pearson and Hoglander, and they play in the Nucks' top6. Let's not kid ourselves and say he is an asset of negative value

Also, the Panthers are in a good position in terms of keeping Huby, Weegar, and Knight as all of their buyout penalties basically get wiped out that summer, and the cap is set to go up a few million by then. They can also reasonably buyout Bob to make more room. Trying to force contending for 2 years when you could do it for, like, 10 with the help of Lundell, seems foolish to me.

They are also very strong at forward, acquiring Miller wouldn't really do anything for them
Forum: Armchair-GM29 nov. à 5 h 12
Sujet: Two birds with one stone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>papishark</b></div><div>No thanks. Murray makes 5.2 for three years and is a guy you never want playing, retaining on Kane would only cost us 3.5 x 3. Unless you pay a first theres no way we take an extra 2 mil a year</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RaZZe</b></div><div>3,5M plus the amount Kane's replacement will make. Also, 3x1,6M after the 3x3,6M.

Murray has a cheaper deal with shorter term. A one for one trade would make sense for the Sharks cap-wise.</div></div>

My bad, I thought you were talking about a buyout. I don't think anyone would take Kane with a 50% retention, however. I think teams will wait for a buyout to make him a DeAngelo type deal or ask for a sweetener for taking him, which the Sharks won't give.