kane zub

Forums/Armchair-GM

Page 1 de 1

Créé par: Dekes

Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston

Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2021

Publié: 30 nov. 2021

Mode - plafond salarial: Basique

Description

I think bruins leadership could help out kane massively. when san jose had pavelski, thornton we heard little negative news about kane it wasn't until after they left that he had no one trying to guide him into the right direction. Personally even though bruins haven't been dirty since pre 2015 we still hold that rep so acquiring kane wouldn't change our reputation really i would be willing to take a risk on kane if he goes to counselling for his gambling addiction and with them help of bruins leadership this trade could end up being a huge steal. We all know what kane is capable of and a line combo of hall, coyle and kane surely would have to be up there as one of the most productive 2nd lines in the league. Kane also replaces foligno on that PP1 and now that line has a top PP quarterback in mcavoy aswell as 4 30+ goal scorers surely it would start to translate more success as kane ran the same spot foligno does in san jose and did very good at his PP role aswell. Kane ran some PK in san jose which is nice and cassidys prefers players that play a solid 2 way game and back check hard

Transactions

BOS

Kane, Evander (3 500 000 $ retained)
Leonard, John
Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)

Détails additionnels:

saw on previous ACGM

SJS

DeBrusk, Jake

BOS

Zub, Artem

Détails additionnels:

cost efficient RHD still young and very underrated
did very good with reilly last season and it would be interesting to see if they could do the same thing in boston

OTT

Clifton, Connor
Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)

Détails additionnels:

clifton could be a solid place holder for them until all their d prospects are ready to play

Enfoui

John Moore: 1 625 000 $ (2 750 000 $)
Chris Wagner: 225 000 $ (1 350 000 $)

Repêchage	1e ronde	2e ronde	3e ronde	4e ronde	5e ronde	6e ronde	7e ronde
2022
2023
2024

FORMATION

VUE À LONG TERME

INTÉGRÉ

TEXTE INTÉGRÉ

TAILLE DE LA FORMATION	PLAFOND SALARIAL	CAP HIT	EXCÉDENTS	BONIS	ESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
23	81 500 000 $	75 519 370 $	1 956 507 $	125 000 $	5 980 630 $

Formation

Ailier gauche	Centre	Ailier droit
Marchand, Brad 6 125 000 $6 125 000 $ AG NMC UFA - 4	Bergeron, Patrice 6 875 000 $6 875 000 $ C M-NTC, NMC UFA - 1	Pastrnak, David 6 666 667 $6 666 667 $ AD M-NTC, NMC UFA - 2
Hall, Taylor 6 000 000 $6 000 000 $ AG NMC UFA - 4	Coyle, Charlie 5 250 000 $5 250 000 $ C, AD M-NTC, NMC UFA - 5	Kane, Evander -1 391 304 $-1 391 304 $ AG, AD NMC UFA - 1
Foligno, Nick 3 800 000 $3 800 000 $ AG, C, AD NMC UFA - 2	Nosek, Tomas 1 750 000 $1 750 000 $ AG, C UFA - 2	Smith, Craig 3 100 000 $3 100 000 $ AD UFA - 2
Frederic, Trent 1 050 000 $1 050 000 $ AG, AD UFA - 2	Haula, Erik 2 375 000 $2 375 000 $ C, AG UFA - 2	Lazar, Curtis 800 000 $800 000 $ AD, C UFA - 1
Blidh, Anton 750 000 $750 000 $ AG, AD UFA - 1		Kuhlman, Karson 725 000 $725 000 $ AD UFA - 1

Défenseur gaucher	Défenseur droitier	Gardien de but
Forbort, Derek 3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ DG M-NTC UFA - 3	McAvoy, Charlie 4 900 000 $4 900 000 $ DD UFA - 1	Ullmark, Linus 5 000 000 $5 000 000 $ G NMC UFA - 4
Grzelcyk, Matt 3 687 500 $3 687 500 $ DG UFA - 3	Carlo, Brandon 4 100 000 $4 100 000 $ DD UFA - 6	Swayman, Jeremy 925 000 $925 000 $ (125 000 $$125K) G RFA - 2
Reilly, Mike 3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ DG UFA - 3	Zub, Artem 2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ DD UFA - 2
Zboril, Jakub 725 000 $725 000 $ DG/DD UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Kane, E.		Bergeron, P.		Marchand, B.
	Pastrnak, D.		McAvoy, C.

Avantage numérique 2
Smith, C.		Coyle, C.		Foligno, N.
	Hall, T.		Grzelcyk, M.

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 43

Gofnut999

Rejoint: janv. 2017

Messages: 19,855

Mentions "j'aime": 8,865

You think giving up a 1st for a guy who will play 3rd pair is wise?

hanson493 a aimé ceci.

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 46

Jonathan61

Rejoint: nov. 2021

Messages: 41

Mentions "j'aime": 1

I don't think the Sens want to get rid of Zub

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 49

hanson493

Rejoint: juin 2019

Messages: 5,618

Mentions "j'aime": 2,764

Quoting: Gofnut999

You think giving up a 1st for a guy who will play 3rd pair is wise?

yeah im not seeing zub as a fit for boston at all here.

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 50

gary_bettman

IamAlwaysRight

Rejoint: sept. 2021

Messages: 2,681

Mentions "j'aime": 1,321

SJ quite frankly laughs. Horrible deal. We can buy him out for less than half retention yet we're going to send a strong fwd prospect AND a pick for the lowly DeBrusk. Hilarious.

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 52

NDoody

Rejoint: août 2019

Messages: 1,668

Mentions "j'aime": 772

Horrible deals all around,

Also Besides Chabot, Zub is likely the only D that stays with the Club as the kids all come up, so no way they move on him for a guy that is a place holder.

sensonfire a aimé ceci.

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 53

Gofnut999

Rejoint: janv. 2017

Messages: 19,855

Mentions "j'aime": 8,865

Quoting: gary_bettman

SJ quite frankly laughs. Horrible deal. We can buy him out for less than half retention yet we're going to send a strong fwd prospect AND a pick for the lowly DeBrusk. Hilarious.

So does Boston honestly. Been a lot of traction in here for it but:

Best case scenario - Kane stays out of the headlines. Plays well. They trade at him at the deadline for bigger return than Debrusk would have gotten.

Worst case - he’s the same douchebag, destroys team chemistry, nobody wants him, stuck with him for 3 more years.

What’s more likely?

Should be an easy no for Don, but it’s Don so….🤷🏻‍♂️

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 54

Dekes

Démarrer sujet

Dekesaladekes

Rejoint: mai 2021

Messages: 3,020

Mentions "j'aime": 1,082

Quoting: gary_bettman

SJ quite frankly laughs. Horrible deal. We can buy him out for less than half retention yet we're going to send a strong fwd prospect AND a pick for the lowly DeBrusk. Hilarious.

ive seen like 3-4 acgm's that were that one soo? i'd do it 1v1 but might aswell try to acquire as much as possible. plus if you buyout not only are you paying him to play for a different team but you got no assets in return, realistically you aren't getting value really for kane as teams know san jose will just buy him out if they can't trade him so it is more or less debrusk for leonard and a 3rd and that is a good deal for san jose

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 57

Dekes

Démarrer sujet

Dekesaladekes

Rejoint: mai 2021

Messages: 3,020

Mentions "j'aime": 1,082

Quoting: Gofnut999

i think the worst is behind him personally. the guy hit rock bottom im sure that was a real wake up call for him, he's freshly divorced and i think i saw one of the guys say kane is reportedly going to counselling aswell those are all positives. I think he has had to much issues in san jose therefore he needs to be moved to have a fresh slate

30 nov. 2021 à 12 h 58

gary_bettman

IamAlwaysRight

Rejoint: sept. 2021

Messages: 2,681

Mentions "j'aime": 1,321

Quoting: Dekes

It's not a good deal. It's abysmal at best.

30 nov. 2021 à 13 h 0

#10

Gofnut999

Rejoint: janv. 2017

Messages: 19,855

Mentions "j'aime": 8,865

Quoting: Dekes

He’s been hated in every locker room he’s been in. No thanks, let him be somebody elses problem.

Xspyrit a aimé ceci.

30 nov. 2021 à 13 h 2

#11

Dekes

Démarrer sujet

Dekesaladekes

Rejoint: mai 2021

Messages: 3,020

Mentions "j'aime": 1,082

Quoting: Gofnut999

You think giving up a 1st for a guy who will play 3rd pair is wise?

Quoting: hanson493

yeah im not seeing zub as a fit for boston at all here.

it is no different then our talks of getting manson price would be close to the same. serchagev plays 3rd pair in tampa nothing wrong with having a stacked one side. outside of our first pair there isn't much consistency so yes im fine with picking up a stronger RHD with previous chemistry with reilly if that is what it takes to have another productive dpairing. Personally carlo has been pretty bad a few times this year and if it takes a little more competition for him to get into a groove again then that is what it takes. All im saying is if reilly and zub were to perform really well don't you think that would make grzz and carlo work a little harder as they don't wanna lose ice time

30 nov. 2021 à 13 h 6

#12

Dekes

Démarrer sujet

Dekesaladekes

Rejoint: mai 2021

Messages: 3,020

Mentions "j'aime": 1,082

Quoting: Gofnut999

He’s been hated in every locker room he’s been in. No thanks, let him be somebody elses problem.

i mean what do the bruins got to lose. if there is a locker room that could settle his ego it would most likely be the bruins. outside of a few years in san jose with pavelski, thornton he hasn't been on teams with the strongest leadership at the time of him being there atleast in boston theres guys like marchy, bergy, chucky who could set him straight. If this was the 80s/90/s even early 2000's bruins would be all over him. personally id rather him talking a little smack to his teammates then sleeping with their wives. in terms of true talent we won't get a player even close to kane if we move debrusk 1v1

30 nov. 2021 à 13 h 46

#13

TheBoyDuddus

Rejoint: avr. 2018

Messages: 2,490

Mentions "j'aime": 1,104

Sens probably pass on that one. Clifton isn’t the answer and a late 1st and 4th doesn’t make up the difference for Ottawa to push Zubs value 2-4 years down the road.

sensonfire a aimé ceci.

30 nov. 2021 à 13 h 57

#14

FunMustBeAlways

Rejoint: janv. 2020

Messages: 5,236

Mentions "j'aime": 2,875

Quoting: gary_bettman

SJ quite frankly laughs. Horrible deal. We can buy him out for less than half retention yet we're going to send a strong fwd prospect AND a pick for the lowly DeBrusk. Hilarious.

Not totally disagreeing, but Leonard isn't that good of a prospect. The 3rd is more insulting than losing him.

30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 16

#15

gary_bettman

IamAlwaysRight

Rejoint: sept. 2021

Messages: 2,681

Mentions "j'aime": 1,321

Quoting: FunMustBeAlways

Not totally disagreeing, but Leonard isn't that good of a prospect. The 3rd is more insulting than losing him.

Leonard still has promise. I wouldn't sleep on him just yet.

30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 27

#16

sensonfire

Rejoint: févr. 2021

Messages: 11,895

Mentions "j'aime": 4,466

This might get you 1 year of Artem Zub, not 2.

Ottawa declines.

30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 33

#17

Gofnut999

Rejoint: janv. 2017

Messages: 19,855

Mentions "j'aime": 8,865

Quoting: Dekes

What have they got to lose? How about Bergy saying F this I’m out of here at years end. Hertl has all but said if Kane is still there he won’t be. Sharks players don’t want him back. Take their cue. He’s not worth it. I’d rather place Debrusk on waivers than trade for Kane.

Répondre

Page 1 de 1

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

COTES DES PARIS

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

Forums/Armchair-GM

kane zub

Description

Transactions

BOS

SJS

BOS

OTT

Enfoui

Formation

Unités spéciales

Code d'intégration

Texte intégré

Question:

Options: