SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Coming to terms with Erik Brannstroms trade value over the course of the season

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 20 oct. 2021
Publié: 20 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/32-thoughts-nhl-create-salary-cap-exceptions/


Thought #10


"The next item of business for Ottawa is Erik Brannstrom. You can read the tea leaves, it will be tough for him to find a consistent spot. But the Senators do recognize his talent, and they will ask real value from teams calling about him."
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Brännström, Erik
Détails additionnels:
This is what I think real value for Erik Brannstrom is right now:

A Low 1st round Pick



Vegas drafted Brannstrom 15th overall in 2017 and he still has the potential and offensive upside of a generic 1st round pick.

Vegas' 1st round pick since 2017 has been 30th overall, 17th overall, 29th overall and 30th overall respectively.


So, trading Brannstrom for Vegas' 1st would suit me just fine.
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
However, I also understand that not every team would want to pay a low 1st for Brannstrom.
CBJ
    Why?

    Because if he is not able to secure a roster spot on a team like the Ottawa Senators after yet another season with his ELC due to expire next year, his trade value depreciates.



    Every week and every month that goes by without Brannstrom in the lineup, he depreciates in value.

    Other teams would know that.



    So, if we're in the 2022 offseason and Brannstrom still has not secured a contributing role in the Ottawa Senators, then that means only one thing:


    He would be worth a 2nd round pick instead.
    3.
    OTT
      Case in point:
      CAR
        Jake Bean


        Left Handed Defenceman


        13th overall pick in 2016


        Traded to Columbus for the 44th overall pick on draft day and then signed an extension with the Blue Jackets afterwards.



        Is that what Brannstrom will be worth next year if the status quo remains?

        A mid 2nd round pick on draft day?
        4.
        OTT
        1. Kravtsov, Vitali
        Détails additionnels:
        And then there's trading Brannstrom for another former 1st round pick that is struggling to secure a spot on an NHL team.
        NYR
          To me, this is the least ideal situation for Ottawa.


          What's to say that he has a better chance to succeed in the NHL than Brannstrom does?
          5.
          BUF
            This would be something like swapping Henri Jokiharju for Alex Nylander.


            Which happened not that long ago between the Hawks and the Sabres.


            https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/250338
            6.
            CHI
            1. Jokiharju, Henri
            Détails additionnels:
            One of the many sins of the Stan Bowman regime in Chicago.


            Something that may never be forgiven :(
            7.
            OTT
              If you read this post from start to finish, you're the greatest!
              BUF
              1. Nylander, Alexander
              Détails additionnels:
              :D
              Rachats de contrats
              Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
              2022
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de VGK
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de TBL
              Logo de CBJ
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de BOS
              Logo de VAN
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de NYI
              Logo de SJS
              2023
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de NSH
              2024
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              Logo de OTT
              TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
              2381 500 000 $60 404 091 $0 $4 057 500 $21 095 909 $
              Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              8 330 674 $8 330 674 $
              AG
              UFA - 7
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 6
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              749 250 $749 250 $
              C, AG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
              C
              RFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
              C
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
              C
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
              AG
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              725 000 $725 000 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              900 000 $900 000 $
              AG, AD
              UFA - 1
              Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 7
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
              G
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
              DD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              900 000 $900 000 $
              G
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
              DG
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
              DD
              UFA - 1
              Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
              DG/DD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
              C, AD
              UFA - 4
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              750 000 $750 000 $
              AD
              UFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
              AD, AG
              UFA - 2
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              726 667 $726 667 $
              AG
              RFA - 1
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              838 333 $838 333 $
              AG
              RFA - 3
              Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
              800 000 $800 000 $
              C, AG
              UFA - 1

              Code d'intégration

              • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
              • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

              Texte intégré

              Cliquer pour surligner
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 18
              #1
              GO FLAMES GO
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: sept. 2020
              Messages: 18,458
              Mentions "j'aime": 10,759
              Good post as usual.
              sensonfire, Radu47, Saskleaf and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 22
              #2
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: mai 2019
              Messages: 2,272
              Mentions "j'aime": 992
              Brannstrom is lower than Bean was at the time he was traded in terms of overall value IMO. I'd say he's probably close to a low 2nd, maybe even a high 3rd. Draft pedigree doesn't matter as much that long after the actual draft
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 24
              #3
              Vegan Commie Hipster
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: oct. 2020
              Messages: 7,888
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
              Quoting: DH28Hockey
              Brannstrom is lower than Bean was at the time he was traded in terms of overall value IMO. I'd say he's probably close to a low 2nd, maybe even a high 3rd. Draft pedigree doesn't matter as much that long after the actual draft


              Yes but results do tho

              He was the 24th highest scoring D last season

              Just because the league mostly ignores pts/60 doesn't we should fall into that too, it's just a way to factor in TOI to scoring, easy to look up these stats now
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 24
              #4
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,985
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,504
              Quoting: DH28Hockey
              Brannstrom is lower than Bean was at the time he was traded in terms of overall value IMO. I'd say he's probably close to a low 2nd, maybe even a high 3rd. Draft pedigree doesn't matter as much that long after the actual draft


              flushed cheeks
              LGuy54 a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 30
              #5
              Vegan Commie Hipster
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: oct. 2020
              Messages: 7,888
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
              High quality post

              👍

              The perceived depreciation factor is big but I think you can trust that waiting another year will fix the situation I mean he really is so so good

              Selling low could be absolutely devastating 😵

              Once he matures physically a bit as he moves further into his prime he'll be too good to keep out of the lineup and already put up nice numbers last year

              If people can't understand that 13 points in 30 games* is a actually quite good then they have no business evaluating hockey much less being in charge

              *0.43 pts/g which was better than EK65, Dumba, etc.

              Anyhow this sucks so much

              Brann deserves so much better than this scenario

              He's earned it
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 44
              #6
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: oct. 2019
              Messages: 4,986
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
              Yes the Nylander Jokiharju move won't be forgotten any time soon.

              Where would Strome fit into your value perception?
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 19 h 55
              #7
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 44,035
              Mentions "j'aime": 24,709
              Quoting: DH28Hockey
              Brannstrom is lower than Bean was at the time he was traded in terms of overall value IMO. I'd say he's probably close to a low 2nd, maybe even a high 3rd. Draft pedigree doesn't matter as much that long after the actual draft


              Lmao cap. He was on pace for 35pts last year playing low minutes. He’s already a 2nd pairing Dman
              sensonfire et DogDayCaps2 a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 7
              #8
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,985
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,504
              Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
              Yes the Nylander Jokiharju move won't be forgotten any time soon.

              Where would Strome fit into your value perception?


              The absolute maximum that I think Chicago could get for Dylan Strome is something like what Calgary got for Sam Bennett.

              https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/440077



              However, I think that a 2nd + a prospect/pick that has less value than Heineman is more likely.

              Chicago might have to retain some salary as well.
              Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 10
              #9
              Jah1722
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 5,424
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
              The difference in a Kravtsov for Brannstrom trade to the Jokiharju and Nylander trade is that neither of the latter has done anything in the NHL where Joki had showed some promise vs Nylander not.

              Kravtsov for Brannstrom makes sense as a player for player trade but idk about it making sense for the teams.
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 15
              #10
              Your favorite Ranger
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 2,286
              Mentions "j'aime": 304
              "AFox23 is the greatest"

              -- sensonfire, 20 October 2021
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 20
              #11
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 44,035
              Mentions "j'aime": 24,709
              Quoting: Jah1722
              The difference in a Kravtsov for Brannstrom trade to the Jokiharju and Nylander trade is that neither of the latter has done anything in the NHL where Joki had showed some promise vs Nylander not.

              Kravtsov for Brannstrom makes sense as a player for player trade but idk about it making sense for the teams.


              Doesn’t make sense for the Rangers but I think it’s fair. It’s more risky for Ottawa because Brannstrom has looked good, was on pace for 35pts last year playing low minutes. Had some pts in preseason too.
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 32
              #12
              Jah1722
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 5,424
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
              Quoting: csick
              Doesn’t make sense for the Rangers but I think it’s fair. It’s more risky for Ottawa because Brannstrom has looked good, was on pace for 35pts last year playing low minutes. Had some pts in preseason too.


              I didn’t realize Brannstrom has 60 games in the NHL. I would expect him to get a decent run this season again based on that.

              Were waivers a part of why he didn’t make the team? Looks like OTT forced the LHD-RHD pairs based on the depth charts on here.
              csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 39
              #13
              KFTW
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2018
              Messages: 44,035
              Mentions "j'aime": 24,709
              Quoting: Jah1722
              I didn’t realize Brannstrom has 60 games in the NHL. I would expect him to get a decent run this season again based on that.

              Were waivers a part of why he didn’t make the team? Looks like OTT forced the LHD-RHD pairs based on the depth charts on here.


              We went and signed MDZ and Brannstrom was the only guy we could send down. We should’ve waived one of the other Ds but didn’t for some reason.
              Jah1722 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 45
              #14
              Jah1722
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 5,424
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
              Quoting: csick
              We went and signed MDZ and Brannstrom was the only guy we could send down. We should’ve waived one of the other Ds but didn’t for some reason.


              I doubt they give up on him since he was a major piece in the Stone trade. Not EK trade
              csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 46
              #15
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,985
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,504
              Quoting: Jah1722
              I doubt they give up on him since he was a major piece in the EK trade.


              You mean Mark Stone?

              o_O
              Jah1722 et csick a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 20 h 46
              #16
              Jah1722
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: janv. 2018
              Messages: 5,424
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
              Quoting: sensonfire
              You mean Mark Stone?

              o_O


              Yes. My bad lol
              sensonfire, csick et BsInOttawa a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 21 h 3
              #17
              Speak of the Devil
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: nov. 2017
              Messages: 23,943
              Mentions "j'aime": 26,438
              Any interest in Jesper Boqvist?
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 21 h 25
              #18
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: oct. 2019
              Messages: 4,986
              Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
              Quoting: sensonfire
              The absolute maximum that I think Chicago could get for Dylan Strome is something like what Calgary got for Sam Bennett.

              https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/440077



              However, I think that a 2nd + a prospect/pick that has less value than Heineman is more likely.

              Chicago might have to retain some salary as well.


              I agree that it would be a 2nd + 3rd/prospect valuation but more than anything I would like to see Strome given more of an opportunity. I am one of the few Hawks fans who still believe he has good upside. Maybe a coaching change would be beneficial, time will tell.
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
              20 oct. 2021 à 22 h 11
              #19
              Démarrer sujet
              sensonfire
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: févr. 2021
              Messages: 11,985
              Mentions "j'aime": 4,504
              Quoting: Devil1122
              Any interest in Jesper Boqvist?


              I'm sure there will be from some team out there.

              But it might not be from Ottawa.

              If there's one team that might want him, it's Columbus

              Because his bro Adam is there and they could help each other reach that next level of performance.



              His value is a bit hard to pin down.

              I couldn't find a good comparable in which a player in a situation like Boqvist's was traded.



              Taking a shot in the dark, he might be worth a 3rd that has a performance based condition attached to it.

              If the condition is met, the 3rd would turn into a 2nd.
              21 oct. 2021 à 10 h 6
              #20
              Avatar de l'utilisateur
              Rejoint: juill. 2016
              Messages: 10,514
              Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
              I'll never understand why Dorion hangs onto assets for dear life until they depreciate. I think he just has no idea what asset management is, I mean a lot of people don't. Maybe he thinks he's only managing people.

              Yes Brannstrom is another depreciating asset but for now he still has good value, but the clock is ticking. Look what happened with RFAs Rudolfs Balcers, Logan Brown, Anthony Duclair... They didn't seem to be in long term plans, we hung on to them for some reason and finally didn't get any value for them. lol I hope they won't do the same for Brannstrom

              Just trade him for Kravtsov and try to salvage the disastrous Stone trade a bit (although that 2nd rounder turned into Egor Sokolov)
              sensonfire a aimé ceci.
               
              Répondre
              To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
              Question:
              Options:
              Ajouter une option
              Soumettre le sondage