SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Top 5 players in each position

Créé par: mauston_atthews
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 1 sept. 2021
Publié: 1 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
25999 999 999 $184 752 774 $0 $850 000 $815 247 225 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 23
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: mauston_atthews
I still don’t know what others see in him. He has so many easy assists to mcdavid and easy goals that mcdavid did most of the work on. Rarely do I see him score a highlight real goal. Doesn’t mean he’s sucks, he had 81 pts this year that’s amazing. I gotta give him credit for it. He finds spaces to score those goals and get those assists. But he just isn’t as dynamic as the others to me.


You didn't seem to knock Marner down for getting "so many easy assists" to Matthews though, so double standard. Just because he makes it look easy, doesn't mean it is. And you ignore that he was 4th in goals last season too.

Using McDavid as a reason to diminish Draisaitl's accomplishments is genuinely funny when you don't apply the same standard to MacKinnon / Rantanen / Landeskog / Makar, Kane / DeBrincat, Matthews / Marner, Panarin / Fox, Barkov / Huberdeau, etc.
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 24
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Lenny7
As a non-Leafs fan who considers himself part of the "Defend Mitch Marner" club, I'd definitely still put Mark Stone ahead of him.


Quoting: mauston_atthews
I can see why you’d think that bc of stone’s great defensive play. Stone’s defence>Marner’s, but marner’s offence>stone’s. Marner is becoming a great defensive player as well. He was like top 10 in takeaways this year as well as selke voting I believe. So if the defence isn’t that far off, and the offence favours marner, I’m taking marner. Offence is more valuable than defence.


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not saying they wont pass them because its inevitable but i disagree that they already have. Josi was injured this year and still on had a great year. Hes also only 1 season removed from being the undisputed #2 in the league. Piet also had an excellent season. Basing the ranks off 1 season, especially a shortened one is silly


Quoting: mokumboi
Yup.


Quoting: matulix
Lol Hedman 4th? Sure


Quoting: Jfstompers
Yeah I have to echo draisaitl but I'm going ovi over landeskog still. I dont love the d order but the players are right except id have josi no hamilton for sure.


Yall, none of this matters, this list is invalid lol
Imagine thinking Pasta isnt a top 5 RW. He is Consensus number 3 according to literally everyone (much less top 5), and most would say he is second to only Kuch...
Like idk why i need to explain that

but yeah this post is a wash, these comments dont even matter because the post is simply wrong
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 26
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Xqb15a
DeBrincat and Landeskog don’t belong on the top 5, top 10 but not top 5, and Demko I definitely wouldn’t have in there, but I can respect the thoughts behind it.


Quoting: Devil1122
Draisaitl>Barkov
Pasta should be top 5
Landeskog shouldn't be top 5


^ ^ ^
This list is just factually bad, its doesnt matter guys,. Its like if someone made a list without Mcdavid in the top 5, it woudlnt be mean to say the list sucks, its just realistic
Devil et Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 27
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,984
Mentions "j'aime": 20,003
Quoting: mauston_atthews
He has stone hands and is slow. Yes he is physical but he has his one timer and his good passing. That’s it. Not saying he sucks but he isn’t as good as the top 5 I have. I think he’s 6 honestly. He still gets points and I gotta give him credit for it.


He has excellent puck control.
Speed also doesn't define a players skill, look at Peter Forsberg
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 32
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,984
Mentions "j'aime": 20,003
Quoting: vr1995
no way on stamkos, stamkos is in the same convo as doughty where their name is what is keeping them talked about as elite players but they havent been for a few years, name and legacy bias


Oh yeah he was only over a point per game 3 of the last 4 seasons and just under this most recent one. Completely washed player and totally not good anymore.

I am not saying he is a top 5 center anymore, he was moved to the wing. He is definitely still better than DeBrincat and Landeskog
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 33
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: mauston_atthews
He has stone hands and is slow.


LOL. This says everything I need to know about your hockey knowledge.
1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 45
#32
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I didn't even notice Pasta not being on this list...Yikes...
LogicOnly a aimé ceci.
1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 10
#33
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Oh yeah he was only over a point per game 3 of the last 4 seasons and just under this most recent one. Completely washed player and totally not good anymore.

I am not saying he is a top 5 center anymore, he was moved to the wing. He is definitely still better than DeBrincat and Landeskog


debrincat and landeskog shouldnt even be there, if you think stamkos is even close to what he was you are delusional, he is not elite anymore therefore shouldnt be on these lists
1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 17
#34
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: Lenny7
I didn't even notice Pasta not being on this list...Yikes...


All these people are arguing above and ignoring my comment lol, hey thats their problem.
The intelligent part of this website knows this ACGM is just a waste and that Pasta is number 2
1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 31
#35
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Quoting: LogicOnly
Yall, none of this matters, this list is invalid lol
Imagine thinking Pasta isnt a top 5 RW. He is Consensus number 3 according to literally everyone (much less top 5), and most would say he is second to only Kuch...
Like idk why i need to explain that

but yeah this post is a wash, these comments dont even matter because the post is simply wrong


Quoting: LogicOnly
Yall, none of this matters, this list is invalid lol
Imagine thinking Pasta isnt a top 5 RW. He is Consensus number 3 according to literally everyone (much less top 5), and most would say he is second to only Kuch...
Like idk why i need to explain that

but yeah this post is a wash, these comments dont even matter because the post is simply wrong


Quoting: LogicOnly
All these people are arguing above and ignoring my comment lol, hey thats their problem.
The intelligent part of this website knows this ACGM is just a waste and that Pasta is number 2


Quoting: LogicOnly
^ ^ ^
This list is just factually bad, its doesnt matter guys,. Its like if someone made a list without Mcdavid in the top 5, it woudlnt be mean to say the list sucks, its just realistic


Arrogance at its finest lol. “I’m right ur wrong! I’m smart you’re dumb!” Dude shut up. You’ve been blabbing on about “this list is bad, everyone knows it sucks just because pastrnak isn’t too 3” that’s you’re reasoning? One player isn’t here so it sucks. Lmao. He doesn’t even deserve to be there anyway. Marner, known setup man, had more goals than him. ALL EVEN STRENGTH. But no he deserves to be there and this whole list is a wash for one reason, and sometimes you didn’t even elaborate. “Logic_Only” LMAO.
1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 52
#36
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
He has excellent puck control.
Speed also doesn't define a players skill, look at Peter Forsberg


Quoting: CD282
You didn't seem to knock Marner down for getting "so many easy assists" to Matthews though, so double standard. Just because he makes it look easy, doesn't mean it is. And you ignore that he was 4th in goals last season too.

Using McDavid as a reason to diminish Draisaitl's accomplishments is genuinely funny when you don't apply the same standard to MacKinnon / Rantanen / Landeskog / Makar, Kane / DeBrincat, Matthews / Marner, Panarin / Fox, Barkov / Huberdeau, etc.


You guys stopped reading when I said he gets a lot of easy assists and goals. These are relatively easy for superstars, like draisaitl and the others on the list, and the ones you mentioned, (Marner, Panarin, huberdeau, barkov, mackinnon). So when I say easy, you should know I mean relatively. Compared to the amount of easy assists and goals I see from the others on this list, he has a lot more of them. Like I said multiple times, it doesn’t mean he sucks. He is a very efficient player who finds spaces to get so many easy assists and goals. I literally said I have him at #6. However, compared to the players on this list, he isn’t as dynamic. He also is much worse defensively than any other centre on this list. That’s why I just cannot put him in there.
1 sept. 2021 à 18 h 39
#37
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not saying they wont pass them because its inevitable but i disagree that they already have. Josi was injured this year and still on had a great year. Hes also only 1 season removed from being the undisputed #2 in the league. Piet also had an excellent season. Basing the ranks off 1 season, especially a shortened one is silly


Are you referring to pietrangelo? I think you’re the only person on the planet to call him Piet. I see Petro a lot, but Piet? Sheesh. I think those three young players have clearly surpassed josi and pietrangelo.
1 sept. 2021 à 18 h 40
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,984
Mentions "j'aime": 20,003
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Are you referring to pietrangelo? I think you’re the only person on the planet to call him Piet. I see Petro a lot, but Piet? Sheesh. I think those three young players have clearly surpassed josi and pietrangelo.


Agree to disagree then, 1 half season doesnt define a player though imo
1 sept. 2021 à 18 h 42
#39
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Agree to disagree then, 1 half season doesnt define a player though imo


The only player you could make that argument about is fox. If you think the other two only had one good half season, you missed some time.
1 sept. 2021 à 18 h 47
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,984
Mentions "j'aime": 20,003
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
The only player you could make that argument about is fox. If you think the other two only had one good half season, you missed some time.


1 better half season. Josi literally won the Norris last year. Piet/Petro hasnt lost a step and still had a very good year
1 sept. 2021 à 21 h 8
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,615
Mentions "j'aime": 9,224
It’s his opinion I can respect that, I disagreed with some of the choices but that’s what makes for good conversation
2 sept. 2021 à 9 h 26
#42
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: mauston_atthews
Arrogance at its finest lol. “I’m right ur wrong! I’m smart you’re dumb!” Dude shut up. You’ve been blabbing on about “this list is bad, everyone knows it sucks just because pastrnak isn’t too 3” that’s you’re reasoning? One player isn’t here so it sucks. Lmao. He doesn’t even deserve to be there anyway. Marner, known setup man, had more goals than him. ALL EVEN STRENGTH. But no he deserves to be there and this whole list is a wash for one reason, and sometimes you didn’t even elaborate. “Logic_Only” LMAO.


Quoting: mauston_atthews
You guys stopped reading when I said he gets a lot of easy assists and goals. These are relatively easy for superstars, like draisaitl and the others on the list, and the ones you mentioned, (Marner, Panarin, huberdeau, barkov, mackinnon). So when I say easy, you should know I mean relatively. Compared to the amount of easy assists and goals I see from the others on this list, he has a lot more of them. Like I said multiple times, it doesn’t mean he sucks. He is a very efficient player who finds spaces to get so many easy assists and goals. I literally said I have him at #6. However, compared to the players on this list, he isn’t as dynamic. He also is much worse defensively than any other centre on this list. That’s why I just cannot put him in there.


Dude. Pasta is a top 5 RW. You are wrong lol
Again, its like saying McDavid isnt top 10.

Dont pull that lmaooo
2 sept. 2021 à 10 h 20
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: mauston_atthews
You guys stopped reading when I said he gets a lot of easy assists and goals. These are relatively easy for superstars, like draisaitl and the others on the list, and the ones you mentioned, (Marner, Panarin, huberdeau, barkov, mackinnon). So when I say easy, you should know I mean relatively. Compared to the amount of easy assists and goals I see from the others on this list, he has a lot more of them. Like I said multiple times, it doesn’t mean he sucks. He is a very efficient player who finds spaces to get so many easy assists and goals. I literally said I have him at #6. However, compared to the players on this list, he isn’t as dynamic. He also is much worse defensively than any other centre on this list. That’s why I just cannot put him in there.


He may be worse defensively, but it's hard to tell from where I'm standing. All defensive metrics are rating 5 players on-ice, there's no way to break each play out individually. So is he worse defensively or is he on a worse team? Let's have a look:

GA/60 (GF%)
Matthews: 2.01 (65.06)
MacKinnon: 2.05 (65.75)
Barkov: 2.11 (59.68)
Crosby: 2.12 (56.34)
Draisaitl: 2.17 (62.50)

The difference here is marginal, from top-to-bottom. Well within the same zip code. And Draisaitl had a better GF% than two of the 4.

GA/60 rel (GF% rel)
Draisaitl: -0.55 (+20.54)
Matthews: -0.21 (+12.03)
Barkov: -0.09 (+5.20)
Crosby: -0.07 (+1.30)
MacKinnon: +0.01 (+10.49)

Now we're getting some meat-and-potatos. We can see here that Draisaitl is FAR better defensively relative to other players on his team, better than all-comers. MacKinnon is almost exactly average defensively on the Avs, his entire value comes from the offensive side of the game.

Now, the next thing out of your mouth is going to be to give all the credit to McDavid, so we'll look at some WOWY's to preempt that fallacy. Since the numbers above are all 5v5, let's look at how often Draisaitl is with McDavid at 5v5 compared to the other players here and their team's next best scorer.

Crosby* with Guentzel: 93.9%
Matthews with Marner*: 87.3%
MacKinnon with Rantanen*: 87.1%
Draisaitl with McDavid*: 37.7%
Barkov with Huberdeau*: 12.7%

Of these guys only Crosby led his team in scoring, and only Barkov had less help than Draisaitl.

Here's a quick look at Draisaitl's defensive rates while playing with McDavid and without:

With McDavid: 17 GA in 343:12 = 2.97 GA/60
W/O McDavid: 16 GA in 567:15 = 1.69 GA/60

I'd say he was ELITE defensively last season when playing center. Here's another proof: when apart, Draisaitl sported a 57.89 GF% while McDavid got just a 50.00 GF%. McDavid had better wingers, too... it's no wonder Holland's biggest offseason acquisition was "a winger for McDavid".
2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 21
#44
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Quoting: LogicOnly
Dude. Pasta is a top 5 RW. You are wrong lol
Again, its like saying McDavid isnt top 10.

Dont pull that lmaooo


So ur saying this whole list is a wash bc pastrnak (who had a worse season last year than anyone in my top 5) should be on this list? That’s a little harsh no? Until he has another Richard winning, 45+ goal season, I just can’t.
2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 23
#45
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Modifié 2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 29
Quoting: CD282
He may be worse defensively, but it's hard to tell from where I'm standing. All defensive metrics are rating 5 players on-ice, there's no way to break each play out individually. So is he worse defensively or is he on a worse team? Let's have a look:

GA/60 (GF%)
Matthews: 2.01 (65.06)
MacKinnon: 2.05 (65.75)
Barkov: 2.11 (59.68)
Crosby: 2.12 (56.34)
Draisaitl: 2.17 (62.50)

The difference here is marginal, from top-to-bottom. Well within the same zip code. And Draisaitl had a better GF% than two of the 4.

GA/60 rel (GF% rel)
Draisaitl: -0.55 (+20.54)
Matthews: -0.21 (+12.03)
Barkov: -0.09 (+5.20)
Crosby: -0.07 (+1.30)
MacKinnon: +0.01 (+10.49)

Now we're getting some meat-and-potatos. We can see here that Draisaitl is FAR better defensively relative to other players on his team, better than all-comers. MacKinnon is almost exactly average defensively on the Avs, his entire value comes from the offensive side of the game.

Now, the next thing out of your mouth is going to be to give all the credit to McDavid, so we'll look at some WOWY's to preempt that fallacy. Since the numbers above are all 5v5, let's look at how often Draisaitl is with McDavid at 5v5 compared to the other players here and their team's next best scorer.

Crosby* with Guentzel: 93.9%
Matthews with Marner*: 87.3%
MacKinnon with Rantanen*: 87.1%
Draisaitl with McDavid*: 37.7%
Barkov with Huberdeau*: 12.7%

Of these guys only Crosby led his team in scoring, and only Barkov had less help than Draisaitl.

Here's a quick look at Draisaitl's defensive rates while playing with McDavid and without:

With McDavid: 17 GA in 343:12 = 2.97 GA/60
W/O McDavid: 16 GA in 567:15 = 1.69 GA/60

I'd say he was ELITE defensively last season when playing center. Here's another proof: when apart, Draisaitl sported a 57.89 GF% while McDavid got just a 50.00 GF%. McDavid had better wingers, too... it's no wonder Holland's biggest offseason acquisition was "a winger for McDavid".


While I respect this, I’d still rather have the ppg+ selke winner, who didn’t even play with huberdeau except for the powerplay, than draisaitl. Like I keep saying, draisaitl isn’t bad, I still think he’s #6. These stats prove it.
2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 29
#46
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: mauston_atthews
So ur saying this whole list is a wash bc pastrnak (who had a worse season last year than anyone in my top 5) should be on this list? That’s a little harsh no? Until he has another Richard winning, 45+ goal season, I just can’t.


Thats simply not true first off
and second off hell yeah, you have Crosby here lol, he was like the 10th best startistical center AT BEST last year.

your logic is deeply flawed, and your list is simply wrong

im not arguing, im telling you
2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 34
#47
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Quoting: LogicOnly
Thats simply not true first off
and second off hell yeah, you have Crosby here lol, he was like the 10th best startistical center AT BEST last year.

your logic is deeply flawed, and your list is simply wrong

im not arguing, im telling you


He had a lower point and goal total than any top 5 RIGHT winger I had except kucherov who didn’t play, but nearly won the conn smythe. If I could put him in the left wing spot I definitely would’ve. He’s probably fourth on that list. Also, Crosby is still a top 5 centre and I shouldn’t need to tell u why. Top 4 in hart voting, 62 pts in 56 games, excellent at both ends of the ice, one of the best play drivers in the league? Come on now.
2 sept. 2021 à 12 h 53
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: mauston_atthews
While I respect this, I’d still rather have the ppg+ selke winner, who didn’t even play with huberdeau except for the powerplay, than draisaitl. Like I keep saying, draisaitl isn’t bad, I still think he’s #6. These stats prove it.


Sure, whatever. I'd rather have the guy who is +20.54 GF% rel while mostly playing with Dominic Kahun and Kailer Yamamoto than any of the non-McDavid players listed, because all of them benefited from better linemates.
2 sept. 2021 à 13 h 16
#49
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 226
Mentions "j'aime": 25
Quoting: mauston_atthews
He had a lower point and goal total than any top 5 RIGHT winger I had except kucherov who didn’t play, but nearly won the conn smythe. If I could put him in the left wing spot I definitely would’ve. He’s probably fourth on that list. Also, Crosby is still a top 5 centre and I shouldn’t need to tell u why. Top 4 in hart voting, 62 pts in 56 games, excellent at both ends of the ice, one of the best play drivers in the league? Come on now.


Pasta isnt a LW at all,
your logic is totally wrong

stop trying, nobody agrees with you at all. Pasta is literally the number 2 RW in the world. Thats a fact.
i dont understand how you are still arguing with me, its childish and strange
2 sept. 2021 à 14 h 39
#50
Démarrer sujet
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,586
Mentions "j'aime": 898
Quoting: LogicOnly
Pasta isnt a LW at all,
your logic is totally wrong

stop trying, nobody agrees with you at all. Pasta is literally the number 2 RW in the world. Thats a fact.
i dont understand how you are still arguing with me, its childish and strange


Ironic since ur literally replying to me. Anyway, I said that if I had to put him in the lw spot, he would be 4th, but I know he is a RW. Anyway, you’ve never quite told me why he should be 2. I’ve told u several times why he isn’t, why is he? Tell me? Logic only…
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage