SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving past this year

Créé par: sammy_daws1997
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 avr. 2021
Publié: 8 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hyman is the focus this offseason. He will get paid and the Leafs need to sign him no matter what. $5.5 seems like fair value but I could see him getting up to about $6.25. I dont see him getting any more than that as then he is getting into Nylander territory which is a bit outside of his comparables.

Second after Hyman depends on the expansion draft. I have decided that the Leafs would make a trade with Seattle to have them take Dermott instead of Kerfoot. In this scenario they protect Matthews/Tavares/Marner/Nylander/Reilly/Holl/Muzzin/Brodie/Campbell. The ask is most likely a 1st to take Dermott based on Vegas's trades, and I would make that trade in a heart beat. Dermott + 1st (likely 28th-32nd overall if Leafs make it out of the North division) for Kerfoot is a trade I make all day. Especially in a year where drafting is more of a crap shoot than ever due to junior leagues not playing all year.

I think the Leafs should then re-sign 3 additional forwards from this year in Spezza, Simmonds, and Galchenyuk. All 3 have looked good this year and all fill different holes in the roster.

The final two forward spoto to Robertson and Engvall. After that, I'm sure that Dubas will also sign 3 or 4 guys to league min. contracts in order to fill the scratches in case of injury. Personally, I would love to see both Boyd and Vesey back in the Leafs uniform...

Moving to the back end, most of the defense is the same as this year. I think the Leafs actually have a great defense this year. They are very defensively sound, and when you have the fire power up front that they do, you dont need guys like Erik Karlson and Cale Makar on the backend. You want defense not offense out of these guys.

For that reason, I would be shocked if they dont try and bring back Bogo.. Assuming Sandin takes the next step, Bogosian is the perfect partner to help him along next year.

After 3 scratches at or below the league min, that leaves us just over $1M to fill the 2nd goalie spot with Campbell. I dont think bringing Freddy back is realistic, and with Campbell looking like the guy who got picked 11OA we don't necessarily need him...

I think signing a guy like Brian Elliott or Jaro Halak would be perfect for Campbell. A guy who can play 30+ games a year giving Campbell some rest ocasionally, and also a bit more experienced to help him grow his game. Both of those guys may want more than $1M per, but that is okay since we can just run with 1 or 2 scratches instead of 3.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
65 500 000 $
1900 000 $
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
TOR
    To Seattle in expansion draft
    VGK
    1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $79 929 783 $0 $400 000 $1 570 217 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 37
    #1
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,739
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,775
    What's the reason giving Seattle a first rounder for a guy they might select anyway?
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 37
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 749
    Mentions "j'aime": 289
    1. Hyman will not get more than 5 million
    2. Seattle will take dermott for free. He is cheaper and younger than kerfoot. If they want kerfoot let them have him he isn’t worth a first so why would they trade a first to keep him
    palhal a aimé ceci.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 38
    #3
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Dermott plus first for Kerfoot is a horrible trade. There's an arguement to be made, because Kerfoot is overpayed, that Dermott>Kerf.
    mitchmarner16 a aimé ceci.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 45
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 6,809
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,289
    That term/dollar combo for Hyman is outrageous. The Dermott to Seattle trade is also absurd; if anything the Leafs would have to pay them to take Kerfoot over Dermott.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 47
    #5
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    Unfortunately if Hyman wants more than 4 you have to let him go. That much for him is just crazy. He's a great complimentary player for Matthews and Marner and can drive the 3rd line, however he's likely at best a 40 point winger away from the top line. You can't overpay depth and he is just that. This much money and term and you could have Andrew Ladd on your hands in the very near future. He's 29 and plays a hard game that can lead to big decline fast. He can be replaced a lot easier than Rielly can and if you give this much money to Hyman, Rielly is gone.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 50
    #6
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    I can't see the Leafs caring who gets taken by Seattle. They want Kerfoot or Dermott have at er.
    8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 55
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,288
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
    Why wouldnt you just buy an upgrade on Kerfoot for that 1st?
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Dermott plus first for Kerfoot is a horrible trade. There's an arguement to be made, because Kerfoot is overpayed, that Dermott>Kerf.


    Kerfoot is not overpaid.

    The leafs are desperately trying to save money as we have expensive top end contracts but 3.5 mil for a 3c/2lw who is decent but not remarkable at either through his prime is totally fair
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Overpay for asking to take Dermott who they may actually take. Maybe a 3rd or 4th
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 13
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Elliot is washed up. Terrible idea
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 15
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    That Hyman contract is insane. Yes Hyman is quite important to the leafs but based on his actual production he has no argument for above 5 MAYBE 5.5 for about 5 years.

    Realistically he should be low to mid 4s.

    I suspect you can meet him in the middle and instead of signing like 4 or 5 years for 5.25 you sign him for 6 or 7 for like 4.25
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 26
    #12
    In Pridham we trust
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 3,589
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
    I like Kerfoot, but it appears you like him wayyyy more than me (or any other Leafs fan apparently).
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 33
    #13
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Kerfoot is not overpaid.

    The leafs are desperately trying to save money as we have expensive top end contracts but 3.5 mil for a 3c/2lw who is decent but not remarkable at either through his prime is totally fair


    Yes, he is overpayed with the flat cap.

    I'm not one of those people who think's he has negative value or anything (in fact, I usually defend the fact he has value), but the reality is he's overpayed.
    8 avr. 2021 à 17 h 57
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 2,795
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,634
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood

    He can be replaced a lot easier than Rielly can and if you give this much money to Hyman, Rielly is gone.


    Just on your Rielly point, he may be gone regardless because I think he'll get around 8-9 million as a UFA.

    I doubt the Leafs can afford that.
    8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 5
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 24,997
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
    Quoting: oneX
    Just on your Rielly point, he may be gone regardless because I think he'll get around 8-9 million as a UFA.

    I doubt the Leafs can afford that.


    I think Rielly will sign for less than that. He really wants to be a Leaf. Pietrangelo has done more in his career and got 8.8. I bet Rielly signs for closer to Krug than Pietrangelo. Under 8, and he'll be worth it as well. Hyman is great but for how long and can he be replicated by a cheaper player? Like Anderson or some other young guy
    8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 33
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Yes, he is overpayed with the flat cap.

    I'm not one of those people who think's he has negative value or anything (in fact, I usually defend the fact he has value), but the reality is he's overpayed.


    He really isn't

    I was in the middle of an analysis the other day but never posted it.

    Over the last 2 years he's about 80th in forwards (min 450 es minutes or so which gave 360 forwards) in first assists/60 abouts 220th in goals/60 and about 160th in points/60

    In other words hes scoring like a low end second liner overall.

    He can play c and w. And he's above average but not special defensively by essentially all metrics.

    He's the epitome of a middle sixer who can play both w and c.

    That is worth about 3.5-4.5.

    He only seems overpaid as the leafs are nickle and diming
    8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 54
    #17
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Quoting: BCAPP
    He really isn't

    I was in the middle of an analysis the other day but never posted it.

    Over the last 2 years he's about 80th in forwards (min 450 es minutes or so which gave 360 forwards) in first assists/60 abouts 220th in goals/60 and about 160th in points/60

    In other words hes scoring like a low end second liner overall.

    He can play c and w. And he's above average but not special defensively by essentially all metrics.

    He's the epitome of a middle sixer who can play both w and c.

    That is worth about 3.5-4.5.

    He only seems overpaid as the leafs are nickle and diming


    https://www.capfriendly.com/comparables/alexander-kerfoot-9447

    Look at this and tell me how many of these guys you'd want over Kerfoot, when these contracts were signed.

    Sunquist, Danault, Jenner, Pageau, Eakin Lowry, etc, all guys that are either on par with Kerfoot (Eakin and Sunquist) or signifigantly better than him (Jenner, Danualt, Pageau Lowry).

    He's not crazy overpayed to the point he has negitive value, but his contract reduces his value. If he was payed half of what he is now, he could probably get at least a second round pick, maybe more. As is, the leafs would likely get a 3rd round pick, maybe not even with this stupid flat cap.
    8 avr. 2021 à 20 h 5
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    https://www.capfriendly.com/comparables/alexander-kerfoot-9447

    Look at this and tell me how many of these guys you'd want over Kerfoot, when these contracts were signed.

    Sunquist, Danault, Jenner, Pageau, Eakin Lowry, etc, all guys that are either on par with Kerfoot (Eakin and Sunquist) or signifigantly better than him (Jenner, Danualt, Pageau Lowry).

    He's not crazy overpayed to the point he has negitive value, but his contract reduces his value. If he was payed half of what he is now, he could probably get at least a second round pick, maybe more. As is, the leafs would likely get a 3rd round pick, maybe not even with this stupid flat cap.


    I'd take kerfoot before Sundqvist, Desharnais, and Cizsikas

    I'd put him roughly equal or a little ahead of Lowry and Eakin

    I'd take Jenner, Danault, Pageau well before him

    Thanks for the list it proves my point. He's essentially totally fairly paid
    8 avr. 2021 à 20 h 13
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    https://www.capfriendly.com/comparables/alexander-kerfoot-9447

    Look at this and tell me how many of these guys you'd want over Kerfoot, when these contracts were signed.

    Sunquist, Danault, Jenner, Pageau, Eakin Lowry, etc, all guys that are either on par with Kerfoot (Eakin and Sunquist) or signifigantly better than him (Jenner, Danualt, Pageau Lowry).

    He's not crazy overpayed to the point he has negitive value, but his contract reduces his value. If he was payed half of what he is now, he could probably get at least a second round pick, maybe more. As is, the leafs would likely get a 3rd round pick, maybe not even with this stupid flat cap.


    Also those comparables are based partially on how much had played and scored when he signed.

    If you change it to just compare his position and money the list changes to an even more favourable one
    8 avr. 2021 à 21 h 6
    #20
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Also those comparables are based partially on how much had played and scored when he signed.

    If you change it to just compare his position and money the list changes to an even more favourable one


    The way you changed it he looks very overpayed. I don't think he's very overpayed, only slightly. But changing it to only cap hits made it very bad for Kerfoot (Backlund, Tierney, Jenner among the names.
    8 avr. 2021 à 21 h 19
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    The way you changed it he looks very overpayed. I don't think he's very overpayed, only slightly. But changing it to only cap hits made it very bad for Kerfoot (Backlund, Tierney, Jenner among the names.


    Jenner, Boone 94.20%
    Eller, Lars 93.20%
    Desharnais, David 90.00%
    Eakin, Cody 87.40%
    Krüger, Marcus 86.00%
    Cizikas, Casey 86.00%
    Wilson, Colin 85.60%
    Sundqvist, Oskar 85.50%
    Faksa, Radek 85.00%
    Pageau, Jean-Gabriel 85.00%
    Coyle, Charlie 84.30%
    Danault, Phillip 82.60%
    Backlund, Mikael 81.50%
    Anisimov, Artem 80.90%
    Tierney, Chris 79.70%
    Lowry, Adam 79.30%
    Berglund, Patrik 78.80%
    Haula, Erik 77.90%
    Athanasiou, Andreas 70.80%

    There's the list for 70% plus

    He's likely about middle of that list

    Jenner, Faksa, Pageau, Danault, Coyle, Tierney, Backlund ahead of him

    Eller, Eakin, Wilson, Haula, Lowry similar

    Better than Berglund, Desharnais, Kruger, Cizsikas, Sundqvist, Athanasiou, Anisimov

    So 19 players

    7 better
    5 similar
    7 worse

    Seems quite fairly paid
    8 avr. 2021 à 23 h 41
    #22
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Jenner, Boone 94.20%
    Eller, Lars 93.20%
    Desharnais, David 90.00%
    Eakin, Cody 87.40%
    Krüger, Marcus 86.00%
    Cizikas, Casey 86.00%
    Wilson, Colin 85.60%
    Sundqvist, Oskar 85.50%
    Faksa, Radek 85.00%
    Pageau, Jean-Gabriel 85.00%
    Coyle, Charlie 84.30%
    Danault, Phillip 82.60%
    Backlund, Mikael 81.50%
    Anisimov, Artem 80.90%
    Tierney, Chris 79.70%
    Lowry, Adam 79.30%
    Berglund, Patrik 78.80%
    Haula, Erik 77.90%
    Athanasiou, Andreas 70.80%

    There's the list for 70% plus

    He's likely about middle of that list

    Jenner, Faksa, Pageau, Danault, Coyle, Tierney, Backlund ahead of him

    Eller, Eakin, Wilson, Haula, Lowry similar

    Better than Berglund, Desharnais, Kruger, Cizsikas, Sundqvist, Athanasiou, Anisimov

    So 19 players

    7 better
    5 similar
    7 worse

    Seems quite fairly paid


    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.
    8 avr. 2021 à 23 h 57
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    Lowry has a career high of 29 points and a career ppg of 0.32. Kerfoots is 0.5 on the dot. The difference in their defensive game does not overcome that to make him a better player.

    Eller similarly. He had one good year of 30 points in 48 gp. Otherwise while on that contract he was about. 27-30 point player or about a 0.35 ppg player.
    8 avr. 2021 à 23 h 59
    #24
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    For the record I'm enjoying this conversation. I appreciate your input
    Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
    9 avr. 2021 à 9 h 44
    #25
    Go leafs go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 13,274
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,211
    Quoting: BCAPP
    For the record I'm enjoying this conversation. I appreciate your input


    I'm enjoying it too. I actually didn't realize Lowry and Ellers

    Quoting: Saskleaf
    Disagree on your assesment.
    In my opinion, Lowry>Kerfoot
    Eller>Kerfoot
    Athanasiou=Kerfoot (when he was with the wings)

    But I do agree he does not have a horrible contract. He's just slightly on the low end, but not by much.


    Quoting: BCAPP
    Lowry has a career high of 29 points and a career ppg of 0.32. Kerfoots is 0.5 on the dot. The difference in their defensive game does not overcome that to make him a better player.

    Eller similarly. He had one good year of 30 points in 48 gp. Otherwise while on that contract he was about. 27-30 point player or about a 0.35 ppg player.


    Had such a low P/PG. I would argue I'd rather have Lowry due to his pyshical game, but none the less I guess I didn't quite realize that he's not too overpaid.
    BCAPP a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage