SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

EICHEL

Créé par: BobbyPSC
Équipe: 2020-21 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 31 mars 2021
Publié: 31 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $75 817 922 $0 $2 550 000 $5 682 078 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 166 $894 166 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
735 000 $735 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
733 333 $733 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 mars 2021 à 9 h 52
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,790
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
No. Eichel deal is not going to happen without a first being included.
Maximporebski et SalamiCheese a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 9 h 53
#2
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Turcotte, Bjornfot, Kaliyev, and a first for Eichel. Eichel and Kaliyev would be a dirty duo though.
BobbyPSC a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 9 h 56
#3
WCSF
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 68
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: Maximporebski
Turcotte, Bjornfot, Kaliyev, and a first for Eichel. Eichel and Kaliyev would be a dirty duo though.



This is closer. The 1st would need to be an unprotected 1st in 2022 as well.
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 0
#4
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: WCSF
This is closer. The 1st would need to be an unprotected 1st in 2022 as well.


Yea I get the feeling that Buffalo would want a 2021 1st rounder because Eichel would significantly improve LAK, and Byfield will be on the team most likely next year. Buffalo could extract more value with an unprotected 2021 1st which will be top 10 almost certainly.
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 3
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 136
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Quoting: Maximporebski
Yea I get the feeling that Buffalo would want a 2021 1st rounder because Eichel would significantly improve LAK, and Byfield will be on the team most likely next year. Buffalo could extract more value with an unprotected 2021 1st which will be top 10 almost certainly.


I hear all of that. But from an outsiders perpective, the Sabres are getting three recent first round picks (1-2 Centers and a potential 2-3 D-man.) The lottery pick would be a no. Turcotte is already a lottery pick.
dtd_tank a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Not enough
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: BobbyPSC
I hear all of that. But from an outsiders perpective, the Sabres are getting three recent first round picks (1-2 Centers and a potential 2-3 D-man.) The lottery pick would be a no. Turcotte is already a lottery pick.

And LA is getting an elite #1 center in his prime that’s still under contract. I don’t think that offer gets it done. It doesn’t make the Sabres better without Jack
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 866
Quoting: MJCrv
And LA is getting an elite #1 center in his prime that’s still under contract. I don’t think that offer gets it done. It doesn’t make the Sabres better without Jack


The only way you're trading Jack and immediately improving BUF is by getting McD, MacK, or arguably one or two other guys in the league. None of which are happening.

So if Jack gets traded, it's going to be quantity over quality, and in this case (coming from a DET fan), you're getting a lot of good pieces. My only argument would be to exchange the 2nd for a 2022 1st (not a top 5 pick because you're getting Turcotte, but still a good pick for BUF).
BobbyPSC a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,740
Mentions "j'aime": 1,662
I’m not trading for Eichel until whatever is going with his neck is fine.
Skeating622 et tryger a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 11 h 12
#10
Skeating_sec224
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 628
Mentions "j'aime": 144
I think LAK got the best assets & CAP situation to land Eichel.

G. Vilardi C
R .Kupari C/RW/LW
K. Clague LD
2021 1st RD Pick

3 players that could realistically players for the Sabres, now (3, 1sts & a 2nd)
BobbyPSC a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 11 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: dtd_tank
The only way you're trading Jack and immediately improving BUF is by getting McD, MacK, or arguably one or two other guys in the league. None of which are happening.

So if Jack gets traded, it's going to be quantity over quality, and in this case (coming from a DET fan), you're getting a lot of good pieces. My only argument would be to exchange the 2nd for a 2022 1st (not a top 5 pick because you're getting Turcotte, but still a good pick for BUF).


I never said they need to get better immediately. I asked how that trade makes them better (at any point). It’s not quantity over quality. It’s quantity AND quality. throwing in #2 centers and 2nd pairing dmen isn’t going to convince anyone to trade an elite center. I’m not insinuating that it has to be 4 premier prospects, but it def needs to be better than what’s listed.
31 mars 2021 à 11 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,684
Mentions "j'aime": 4,652
Kings are fine at center going forward, they need a top line LD and top line LW. Turcotte and BJornfot could be in the running for those two roles and JAD has been a solid bottom-6. I get that the Kings have the space and the assets to get Eichel, but with Eichel's injury, regression this season, lengthy $10M contract with a no-move clause soon to kick in, why take on all that risk when the Kings have three centers at entry level contracts who are projected top-6 centers?

What the Sabres think he is worth will not meet with what teams are willing to pay, especially when so few teams can just take on $10M.
31 mars 2021 à 11 h 23
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 866
Quoting: MJCrv
I never said they need to get better immediately. I asked how that trade makes them better (at any point). It’s not quantity over quality. It’s quantity AND quality. throwing in #2 centers and 2nd pairing dmen isn’t going to convince anyone to trade an elite center. I’m not insinuating that it has to be 4 premier prospects, but it def needs to be better than what’s listed.


Turcotte will be a 1C. Perhaps not with Byfield on the same team, but that doesn't make him a 2C any more than it made Malkin a 2C in PIT 10 yrs ago.

Regardless, what tryger says below is true. LA doesn't need to make this deal. I was just pointing out the valuation isn't too bad.
31 mars 2021 à 11 h 40
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 761
Mentions "j'aime": 303
Quoting: dtd_tank
Turcotte will be a 1C. Perhaps not with Byfield on the same team, but that doesn't make him a 2C any more than it made Malkin a 2C in PIT 10 yrs ago.

Regardless, what tryger says below is true. LA doesn't need to make this deal. I was just pointing out the valuation isn't too bad.

I guess when I say he’s a 2, I’m insinuating that he won’t be a superstar. He’ll be a very good center that definitely capable of playing 1C. My issues so much aren’t with turcotte. I love turcotte. I just don’t think the rest is enough. I think it’ll take two top end prospects in the mix.

Either way, I agree that LA doesn’t need Eichel and shouldn’t trade for him. They’ve done a great job building up the prospect pool and you’d hate to trade 4 key pieces for one player. Even if it is eichel.

In the end, if Eichel is traded, both fan bases will be upset. Sabres fans will have wanted more and the other will believe they gave up too much. When both fan bases are unhappy with the deal, it’s probably a good one. Lol
dtd_tank a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage